Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment

Ugarriza Uribe, Juan Esteban; Caluwaerts, Didier

Ítem

Acceso Abierto

Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.gruplac	Grupo de Investigación en Derechos Humanos	spa
dc.creator	Ugarriza Uribe, Juan Esteban
dc.creator	Caluwaerts, Didier
dc.creator.google	Ugarriza, Juan E.
dc.creator.google	Caluwaerts, Didier
dc.date.accessioned	2018-10-05T16:58:07Z
dc.date.available	2018-10-05T16:58:07Z
dc.date.created	2012
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.description.abstract	Methodological evaluations of deliberative mini-publics usually focus on the internal and external validity of experimental designs. Even though such a focus on causal inference and generalization is important, it is incomplete. We argue that the epistemic validity of experimental designs should also be taken into account in order to ensure measuring truly a deliberative exercise rather than just a regular discussion. By ensuring the inclusion and publicity of all arguments, the process of arguing back-and-forth between multiple positions is theoretically claimed to generate better outcomes and should therefore be validated along epistemic lines. Here, we suggest some methodological techniques for enabling the epistemic validity assumption of deliberative experimental designs. These techniques relate to the sampling of the groups and the treatments they receive.	eng
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.identifier.issn	ISSN 1937-2841
dc.identifier.uri	http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18618
dc.language.iso	spa	spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage	20
dc.relation.citationIssue	No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage	1
dc.relation.citationTitle	Journal of Public Deliberation
dc.relation.citationVolume	Vol. 8
dc.relation.ispartof	Journal of Public Deliberation, ISSN 1937-2841, Vol. 8 No.1, Art.6, (2012); pp. 1-20	spa
dc.relation.uri	https://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=jpd	spa
dc.rights.accesRights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.acceso	Abierto (Texto Completo)	spa
dc.rights.uri	http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1937-2841/es/
dc.source.instname	instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame	reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keyword	deliberative democracy	spa
dc.subject.keyword	epistemic proceduralism	spa
dc.subject.keyword	experimental methodology	spa
dc.subject.keyword	cognitive diversity.	spa
dc.title	Favorable conditions for epistemic validity in deliberative experiments : A methodological assesment	spa
dc.type	article	eng
dc.type.hasVersion	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spa	Artículo	spa