Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas de la colporrafia anterior por técnica tradicional versus técnica de sitio específico

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorGarzón Pulido, Lina Soledad
dc.creatorGarcía Riaño, Diego Armando
dc.creatorAragón Mendoza, Rafael
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Ginecología y Obstericia
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-23T15:53:46Z
dc.date.available2012-11-23T15:53:46Z
dc.date.created2012-11-21
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionEl prolapso del piso pélvico es una entidad frecuente, especialmente en pacientes postmenopáusicas y en su gran mayoría requiere tratamiento quirúrgico. En este estudio comparamos la aparición de complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas entre la colporrafia anterior con técnica clásica (TC) versus la colporrafia anterior con técnica de sitio especifico (CSE). Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, de dos cohortes de pacientes que requirieron colporrafia anterior entre agosto de 2009 hasta junio de 2012. Las características de cada grupo fueron homogéneas y comparables. El desenlace de mayor frecuencia fue dehiscencia de la línea de sutura, sin embargo, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las dos técnicas. La aparición de reprolapso temprano y el diagnóstico de abscesos o hematomas presentaron frecuencias que carecen de diferencia significativa. No hubo complicaciones tempranas graves tales como sangrado intraoperatoria mayor o lesiones vesicouretrales. Los resultados sugieren que las dos técnicas tienen una incidencia baja de complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas y por lo tanto parecen ser seguros dentro del manejo quirúrgico del prolapso del componente anterior del piso pélvico.spa
dc.description.abstractOrgan pelvic prolapse is a frequent pathology, especially in menopausic patients and most cases require surgical treatment. In this study we compared the incidence of early postoperative complications between anterior colporrhaphy by classical technique (TC) versus anterior colporrhaphy by site specific technique (CSE). We made a analytical, retrospective study of two cohorts of patients that required anterior colporrhaphy between august 2009 and june 2012. The first cohort was TC group and the second was CSE group. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar and comparable. The most frequent outcome was dehiscence; however, there was a difference without statistical significance between both techniques. The incidence of early new prolapse and the diagnosis of abscess or hematomes showed no statistical difference as well. There were not serious complications such as mayor intraoperative bleeding or bladder-urethral lesions. The results suggest that both techniques haw low incidence of early postoperative complications and therefore seem to be safe in management of anterior compartment pelvic prolapse.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4006
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4006
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstericiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto completo)spa
dc.rights.ccAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWalker JA, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol 2011; 22:127–135.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSlieker-ten Hove MCPh, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:184.e1-184.e7.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSeo JT, Kim JM. Pelvic organ support and prevalence by pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1769–177.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHerschorn S., et al. Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery for Sphincter Incontinence and Prolapse. Wein: Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th ed. Ch.66. 2007.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurology and Urodynamics 2002; 21:167–78.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89:501–6.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKelly HA. Incontinence of urine in women. Urol Cutan Rev 1913; 17: 291–3.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCracken GR, Lefebvre G. Mesh-free anterior vaginal wall repair: history or best practice? The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2007; 9:233–242. RCOG.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGraves EJ, Gillum BS. National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual summary, 1994. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 13(128). 1997.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, van der Vaart C. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 2011; 118:1518–1527.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEl-Nazer M, Gomma I, Ismail Madkour W. Anterior colporrhaphy versus repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a comparative clinical study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May 31. Artículo en proceso de publicación
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAltman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C; Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group. Anterior Colporrhaphy versus Transvagina Mesh for Pelvic-Organ Prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12; 364(19):1826-36.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNatale F, Marziali S, Cervigni M. Tension-free cystocele repair (TCR): longterm follow-up. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, 22–25 October 2000, Rome, Italy.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBadlani G, Davila GW, Michael MC, Rosette JJM. Continency Current Concepts. 2009; 24: 329-341.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPetros PE. The Female Pelvic Floor. Function, dysfunction and management according with integral theory. 2nd ed. 2007; 2-4: (14-120).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMaher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Nov; 22(11): 1445-57.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNguyen JAN, Burchett Jr. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:891–898.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWorld Health Statistics report 2011. World Health Organization.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNygaard I, Barber M. Prevalence of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in US Women. JAMA. 2008 September 17; 300(11): 1311–1316.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVimplis S, Hooper P. Assessment and management of pelvic organ prolapse. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2005; 15: 387–393.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbed H, Rogers G. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Diagnosis and Treatment. Med Clin N Am. 2008; 92: 1273–1293.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 489–97.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWeber Am, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski R, Fischer J, Hull T, Nygaard I, Weidner AC. The Standardization of Terminology for Researchers in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders. Int Urogynecol J 2001; 12: 178–186.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYoung S.Vaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2009; 36: 565–584.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDeLancey JO. Anatomical aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1717–28.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShull BL, Benn SJ, Kuehl TJ. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: An analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171 (6): 1429 – 1439.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationElkins TE, Chesson RR, Videla F. Transvaginal paravaginal repair: A useful adjunctive procedure in pelvic relaxation surgery. J Pelvic Surg 2000; 6:11 – 15.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMallipeddi P, Kohli N, Steele AC, Owens RG, Karram MM. Vaginal paravaginal repair in the surgical treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Prim Care Update Ob Gyn. 1998 Jul 1; 5(4): 199-200.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCorriere J, Sandler C. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las lesiones vesicales. Urol Clin N Am. 2006; 33: 67-71.
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectProlapso de piso pélvicospa
dc.subjectComponente anteriorspa
dc.subjectColporrafia anterior sitio específicospa
dc.subjectComplicacionesspa
dc.subject.keywordPelvic organ prolapseeng
dc.subject.keywordAnterior compartmenteng
dc.subject.keywordAnterior colporrhaphy site specificeng
dc.subject.keywordPostoperative complicationseng
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades del aparato urinariospa
dc.subject.lembCirugía uro ginecológicaspa
dc.subject.lembCirugía obstétricaspa
dc.subject.lembGinecologíaspa
dc.titleComplicaciones postoperatorias tempranas de la colporrafia anterior por técnica tradicional versus técnica de sitio específicospa
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
GarciaRiano-DiegoArmando-2012.pdf
Tamaño:
966.7 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Especialización en Ginecología y Obstetricia