Identidad Institucional CRAI
Logo EdocUR
    • English
    • español
    • português
  •  Work Submission
  •  FAQs
  • English 
    • English
    • español
    • português
  • Login

Contacto

Twitter

Facebook

Youtube

View Item 
  •   Repositorio Institucional EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario
  • Investigación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Repositorio Institucional EdocUR - Universidad del Rosario
  • Investigación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources : the case of urban and peri-urban forests

  • Exportar citas ▼
    • Exportar a Mendeley
    • Exportar a BibTex
Thumbnail
Date
2018
Author
Staudhammer, Christina L.
Escobedo, Francisco JAutoridad Universidad de Rosario
Blood, Amy
Métricas

Share
Citation
URI
10.1002/ecs2.2450
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19154

Abstract
Multi-scale forest inventory and monitoring data are increasingly being used in studies assessing forest diversity, structure, disturbance, and carbon dynamics. Also, local-level urban forest inventories are providing plot data and protocols to study tree diversity and ecosystem services in urban forests worldwide. But, differences in the sampling methods underlying these disparate protocols and data sources is a non-trivial concern in formulating comparative analyses. We assess commonly used methods for comparing tree diversity in peri-urban and urban forests when available data have different sample sizes, plot sizes, and sampling intensities. We present methods for appropriately evaluating species richness, as well as methods for comparing species distributions via community data matrices. Using permanent plot data from the southeastern United States, we present a case study comparing urban and peri-urban forests along a north–south gradient, and assessing species richness and the ecological homogenization hypothesis. Our findings indicate that comparisons of tree species richness among communities, or forest types, are often inconclusive since commonly used sample sizes do not provide precise estimates of the number of species present. While the ecological homogenization hypotheses can be tested under conditions of unequal sampling effort, we suggest robust methods such as PERMANOVA and the Raup-Crick dissimilarity index. A framework for selecting appropriate methods is also discussed. As forests are increasingly being altered by anthropogenic drivers, future studies using disparate data sources must account for differences in measurements and sampling protocols in order to produce results that are both statistically defensible and useful for science-based management. © 2018 The Authors.
Subject
Specie Richness ; Plot Datar ; Datar Sources ;

Source link

https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.2450...

Show full item record

Collections
  • Artículos [6080]
Política de Acceso Abierto URPortal de Revistas URRepositorio de Datos de Investigación URCiencia Abierta UR
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsTypeSubjectsAdvisorBy Issue DateThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsTypeSubjectsAdvisorBy Issue Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Política de Acceso Abierto URPortal de Revistas URRepositorio de Datos de Investigación URCiencia Abierta UR