Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorTrownsell, Tamara
dc.creatorTickner, Arlene Beth
dc.creatorQuerejazu, Amaya
dc.creatorReddekop, Jarrad
dc.creatorShani, Giorgio
dc.creatorShimizu, Kosuke
dc.creatorChadha Behera, Navnita
dc.creatorArian, Anahita
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T14:08:57Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T14:08:57Z
dc.date.created2020-08-25
dc.date.issued2020-08-25
dc.descriptionLa diferencia, una preocupación central para el estudio de las relaciones internacionales (RI), no ha visto trastocados adecuadamente sus fundamentos ontológicos. Este foro explora cómo los supuestos existenciales arraigados en la lógica relacional proporcionan un conjunto de herramientas significativamente distinto que nos impulsa a reorientar la forma en que percibimos, interpretamos y abordamos tanto la similitud como la diferencia Partiendo de compromisos cosmológicos originados en los Andes, Asia Meridional, Asia Oriental y Oriente Medio, las seis contribuciones de los Andes, Asia Meridional, Asia Oriental y Oriente Medio, las seis contribuciones exploran cómo nuestros teóricos, investigadores y docentes. Esta conversación inicial señala el contenido clave y los focos del futuro trabajo relacional en las RRII.es
dc.description.abstractDifference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East Asia, and the Middle East, the six contributions explore how our existential assumptions affect the ways in which we deal with difference as theorists, researchers, and teachers. This initial conversation pinpoints key content and foci of future relational work in IR.es
dc.format.extent40 ppes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa008es
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/37670
dc.language.isospaes
dc.relation.citationEndPage64 ppes
dc.relation.citationIssue1es
dc.relation.citationStartPage25 ppes
dc.relation.citationTitleInternational Studies Perspectiveses
dc.relation.citationVolume22es
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)es
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationACHARYA,AMITAV. 2011. “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West.” Millennium 39: 619–37.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2014.“GlobalInternationalRelations(IR)andRegionalWorlds:ANewAgendaforInternational Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58: 647–59.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationACHARYA,AMITAV, AND BARRY BUZAN, eds. 2007. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Reflections on and from Asia.” International Relations of Asia-Pacific 7: 287–312.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationeds. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia.NewYork: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAGATHANGELOU,ANNA M., AND L.H.M. LING. 2004. “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism.” International Studies Review 6: 21–49.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAHMED,SARAH. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationANIDJAR,GIL. 2014. Blood: A Critique of Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationARNOLD,DENISE Y. 2018. Los eventos del crepúsculo. Relatos históricos y hagopgráficos de un ayllu andino en el tiempo de los españoles.LaPaz:PluralEditores.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationASAD,TALAL. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBARAD,KAREN. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax 28: 168–87.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBEHERA,NAVNITA C. 2007. “Re-Imagining IR in India.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7: 341–68.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBEHR,HARTMUT. 2014. Politics of Difference: Epistemologies of Peace. New York: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBELAUNDE,LUISA ELIVRA. 2000. “The Convivial Self and the Fear of Anger Amongst the Airo-Pai of Amazonian Peru.” In The Anthropology of Love and Anger: The Aesthetics of Conviviality in Native Amazonia,edited by Joanne Overing and Alan Passes, 209–20. New York: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBENNETT,JANE. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBERLANT,LAUREN, ed. 2004. Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion. London: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBILGIN,PINAR. 2008. “Thinking Past “Western” IR?” Third World Quarterly 29: 5–23.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2012. “Security in the Arab World and Turkey: Differently Different.’” In Thinking International Relations Differently, edited by Arlene B. Tickner and David L. Blaney, 27–47. London: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBLASER,MARIO. 2010. Storytelling Globalization from the Chaco and Beyond. Durham: Duke University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2013. “Notes towards a Political Ontology of ‘Environmental’ Conflicts.” In Contested Ecologies: Dialogues in the South on Nature and Knowledge, edited by Lesley Green, 13–27. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2018. “Doing and Undoing Caribou/Atiku: Diffractive and Divergent Multiplicities and Their Cosmopolitical Orientations.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1: 47–64.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBOUYSSE-CASSAGNE, THÉRÈSE. 2004. “El Sol De Adentro: Wakas y Santos En Las Minas De Charcas y En El Lago Titicaca (Siglos XV a XVII).” Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 8: 59–97.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBROOM, BENJAMIN J. 2009. “Building Relational Empathy through an Interactive Design Process.” In Communication and Conflict Transformation through Local, Regional and Global Engagement, edited by Peter M.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKellet and Thomas G. Matyok, 184–200. New York: Lexington Books.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBUTLER, JUDITH. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCHAKRABARTY, DIPESH. 2007. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCHAN, STEPHEN. 1994. “Beyond the North-West: Africa and the East.” In Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, edited by A.J.R. Groom and Margot Light, 257–4. New York: Pinter Publisherses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCHANDLER, DAVID. 2018. Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene. London: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCHATTERJEE, PARTHA. 1994. The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. New Delhi: Oxford University Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCHITTICK, WILLIAM C. 2017. “Rumi, Jalal al-D ¯ ¯ın Vii. Philosophy.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica (online edition). Accessed January 9, 2019. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/rumi-philosophy.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCOHEN, JEFFREY. 2015. Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCOOLE, DIANA, AND SAMANTHA FROST, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCOPLAN, AMY, AND PETER GOLDIE, eds. 2011. Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCORNTASSEL, JEFF, AND MARC WOONS. 2017. “Indigenous Perspectives.” In International Relations Theory, edited by Stephen McGlinchey, Rosie Walters and Christian Scheinpflug, 131–7. Bristol: E-International Relationses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCOULTHARD, GLEN. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCRAWFORD, NETA C. 2000. “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotions and Emotional Relationships.” International Security 24: 116–56es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDE LA CADENA, MARISOL. 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDECETY, JEAN, AND WILLIAM ICKES, eds. 2009. Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Cambridge: MIT Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDECETY, JEAN, AND PHILIP A. JACKSON. 2004. “The Functional Architecture of Human Empathy.” Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 3: 71–100.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDESCOLA, PHILIPPE. 1996. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation. 2011. “Más Allá De La Naturaleza y Cultura.” In Cultura y naturaleza. Aproximaciones a propósito del bicentenario de la Independencia de Colombia, edited by Leonardo Montenegro, 75–98. Bogotá: Jardín Botánico de Bogotá José Celestino Mutis.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDOUZINAS, COSTAS. 2000. The End of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEILEEN, JOHN. 2017. “Empathy in Literature.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Empathy, edited by Heidi L. Maibom, 306–16. New York: Routledge. EISENBERG, NANCY, AND RICHARD A. FABES. 1998. “Prosociales
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEISENBERG, NANCY, AND RICHARD A. FABES. 1998. “Prosocial Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, (Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development), edited by William Damon and Nancy Eisenberg, 701–78. New York: Wiley.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEISENBERG, NANCY, AND JANET STRAYER, eds. 1987. Empathy and its Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEMBREE, AINSLIE, AND STEPHEN HAY, eds. 1988. Sources of Indian Tradition, Vol.1 (From the Beginning to 1800). New York: Columbia University Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGEERTZ, CLIFFORD. 1983. ““From the Native’s Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 56–57. New York: Basic Bookses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGILSON, ETIENNE. 1991 [1936]. The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy. Translated by A.H.C. Downes. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGREY, SAM, AND RAUNA KUOKKANEN. 2019. “Indigenous Governance of Cultural Heritage: Searching for Alternatives to Co-management.” International Journal of Heritage Studies. DOI: 10.1080/ 13527258.2019.1703202.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHARAWAY, DONNA. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHARRISON, MARY-CATHERINE. 2008. “The Paradox of Fiction and the Ethics of Empathy: Reconceiving Dicken’s Realism.” Narrative 16: 256–78.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHEAD, NAOMI. 2012. “Transforming Conflict: Trust, Empathy and Dialogue.” International Journal of Peace Studies 17: 33–55.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2016. “A Politics of Empathy: Encounters with Empathy in Israel and Palestine.” Review of International Studies 42: 95–113es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHEWITT, VERNON. 1995. Reclaiming the Past? London: Portland Books.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHOBBES, THOMAS. 1985 [1651]. Leviathan. Edited with an introduction by C.B. Macpherson. London: Penguines
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHODDER, IAN. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Malden: WileyBlackwelles
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHOLLAN, DOUGLAS W. 2012. “Emerging Issues in the Cross-Cultural Study of Empathy.” Emotion Review 4: 70–78.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHOLLAN, DOUGLAS W., AND JASON C. THROOP. 2008. “Whatever Happened to Empathy? Introduction.” Ethos 36: 385–401.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation. 2011. The Anthropology of Empathy: Experiencing the Lives of Others in Pacific Societies. New York: Berghahn Books.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHOLLIS, MARTIN, AND STEVE SMITH. 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHUTCHINGS, KIMBERLY. 2011. “Dialogue between Whom? The Role of the West/Non-West Distinction in Promoting Global Dialogue in IR.” Millennium 39: 639–47.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHUTCHINSON, EMMA, AND ROLAND BLEIKER. 2014. “Theorizing Emotions in World Politics.” International Theory 6: 491–514.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationINAYATULLAH, NAEEM, AND DAVID L. BLANEY. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledgees
dc.source.bibliographicCitationINGOLD, TIM. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling, and Skill. New York: Routledgees
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJACKSON, PATRICK T. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledgees
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKAKAR, SUDHIR. 1995. The Colours of Violence. New Delhi: Vikinges
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKALTOFEN, CAROLIN. 2018. “With a Posthuman Touch: International Relations in Dialogue with the Posthuman—A Human Account.” In Posthuman Dialogues in International Relations, edited by Erika Cudworth, Stephen Hobden and Emilian Kavalski, 32–51. New York: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKANJI, AZEEZAH. 2017. “Colonial Animality: Constituting Canadian Settler Colonialism through the Human–Animal Relationship.” In Critical Epistemologies of Global Politics, edited by Marc Woons and Sebastian Weier, 63–78. Bristol: E-International Relationses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKATOUZIAN, HOMA. 2006. The Poet of Love, Life and Compassion. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKAVIRAJ, SUDIPTA. 1995. Crisis of the Nation-State in India. Oxford: Blackwell.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKAVIRAJ, SUDIPTA. 1995. Crisis of the Nation-State in India. Oxford: Blackwell.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKEEN, SUZANNE. 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKING, HAYDEN. 2017. “The Erasure of Indigenous Thought in Foreign Policy.” Opencanada.org, July 31. https://www.opencanada.org/features/erasure-indigenous-thought-foreign-policy/.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKOSAKA, MASAAKI, KEIJI NISHITANI, IWAO KOYAMA, AND SHIGENTAKA SUZUKI. 1943. Sekaishiteki Tachiba to Nihon [Japan and the World Historical Standpoint]. Tokyo: Chuo Koron.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKRISHNA, DAYA. 2012. Civilizations: Nostalgia and Utopia. New Delhi: Sage.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKUOKKANEN, RAUNA. 2019. “At the Intersection of Arctic Indigenous Governance and Extractive Industries: Survey of Three Case Studies.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6: 15–21.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKURKI, MILJA. 2019. “Relating to Relational Worlds: Critical Theory, Relational Thought and Relational Cosmology.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical International Relations, edited by Jenny Edkins, 65–76. London: Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLADUKE, WINONA. 1999. All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life. Cambridge: South End Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLAJO, JAVIER. 2003. Qhapaq Ñan: La ruta Inca de la sabiduría. Quito: Abya-Yalaes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLAL, VINAY. 2000. Dissenting Knowledges, Open Futures: The Multiple Selves and Strange Destinations of Ashis Nandy. New Delhi: Oxford University Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLATOUR, BRUNO. 2002. War of the Worlds: What about Peace? Translated by Charlotte Bigg. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2007. Nunca fuimos modernos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editoreses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLEWIS, FRANKLIN. 2012. “Golestan-e Sa‘di.” In ¯ Encyclopaedia Iranica (online edition). Accessed December 3, 2018. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/golestan–sadi.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLING, L. H. M. 2014. The Dao of World Politics. New York: Routledgees
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLOSENSKY, PAUL. 2012. “Sa‘di.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica (online edition). Accessed December 3, 2018. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/sadi-sirazi.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMAIBOM, HEIDI L., ed. 2014. Morality and Empathy. Oxford: Oxford University Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2017. The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Empathy. New York: Routledgees
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectRR. II. posoccidentaleses
dc.subjectPoscolonialismoes
dc.subjectDecolonialismoes
dc.subjectRelacionalidades
dc.subjectDiferenciaes
dc.subject.ddcMigración y colonización internacionaleses
dc.subject.keywordPost-colonialismes
dc.subject.keywordPost-Western IRes
dc.subject.keywordDe-colonialismes
dc.subject.keywordRelationalityes
dc.subject.keywordDifferencees
dc.titleDiffering about Difference: Relational IR from around the Worldes
dc.typearticlees
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.type.spaArtículoes
local.department.reportFacultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanoses
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
ekaa008.pdf
Tamaño:
415.34 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos