XVII FNE. Foro Nacional Estudiantil de Economía y Finanzas - Propuestas por Colombia: La voz de los jóveneshttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/324512024-03-28T17:38:26Z2024-03-28T17:38:26Z51FNE XVII 2020. Panel 1: Nuevos retos y oportunidades de la educación en ColombiaCheyne García, José AlejandroAristizabal, Juan DavidDíaz, Bibiam AleydaCastillo Varela, Mauriciohttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/325672021-09-28T08:01:21Zdc.title: FNE XVII 2020. Panel 1: Nuevos retos y oportunidades de la educación en Colombia
dc.description.abstract: On June 3, within the framework of the 2020 National Student Forum, Proposals for Colombia: the voice of young people, from the Faculty of Economics, the first panel of discussion was held, called "New Challenges and Opportunities for Education in Colombia". The event had the opinion of experts in academic and educational subjects, who responded to different conjunctural questions. Among them were Alejandro Cheyne, rector of the Universidad del Rosario, Juan David Aristizábal, educator, Mauricio Castillo, undersecretary of quality and relevance of the Bogotá Secretariat, Darwin Cortés, research professor and Marcela Bautista, sociologist of the National University. For our experts, among the main challenges that education currently faces is to ensure that it is of high quality for all, to reevaluate the business model to reduce entry barriers, integrate hard and soft skills, and achieve interaction spaces for develop socio-emotional skills. On the other hand, among the opportunities generated within the crisis, are innovation in meeting spaces, pedagogical transformation of roles, rethinking the duration and improving access to the world of work. The panel ended with a round of personalized questions for each panelist, focused on each one's specialty. The first question, about the gap between city and rurality in terms of remote education, was for Marcela, who answered that despite the complex conditions that rural areas face in terms of poverty, violence and accessibility to remote education, " As an educational system, we do not have a mechanism or a communication strategy with that rurality, but above all with dispersed rurality ”, due to the administrative configuration of the education secretariats. The second question, about student dropout, was for Professor Darwin, who answered that effectively dropout will increase due to the changes generated by the crisis, but that this factor will repress economic development, since the more time students spend at home, the less time parents have to go out and look for work. Therefore, "much of the solution depends on the children being in school, which means that there must be a significant commitment from the government to alleviate the problems of credit financing that families have." The third question was, how can entrepreneurship respond to what is happening today? Juan David results in three main ideas: first, “think about how we educate ourselves in better pedagogies to teach in higher education”, in addition, think about Rethinking the methodology for paying teachers considering the new environmental conditions, with the increase in demand for recorded classes that connect emotionally, teachers could earn money by monetizing their videos. And finally, "the strengthening of the talent of our teachers in higher education, knowing that today we have many more teachers abroad, since we do not need to incur the cost of bringing them physically." The fourth question was about the progress that the Mayor's Office has had in terms of infrastructure to implement the single day in the institutions and what could happen to these given the growing need for virtual spaces, to which Mauricio emphasized that today implement the single day is a challenge with or without a pandemic, but that “through the use of remote education, we could begin to gain experiences of how, in an eventual post-pandemic return, we will be able and make much more efficient” the combination of use of these spaces. Thinking of taking advantage of the opportunity that this situation represents to develop the necessary infrastructure in a full-time situation. The last question was, how are universities going to be after the pandemic ?, which our rector answered, highlighting the importance of “entrepreneurship”, which is defined as learning to undertake, “some of us firmly believe that entrepreneurship is for all, that a socioeconomic condition is not required, that it does not depend on any gene, that it does not depend on family or business background, and we firmly believe that entrepreneurship is a competence that can be developed, and that, therefore, like all competence can be evaluated ", said Cheyne," what universities have to do is really realize their mission ... one, form life projects, and two, serve the country, because for a university like ours the service to The country is not an alternative, it is the solution ”, he concluded.
dc.description: El pasado 3 de junio, en el marco del Foro Nacional Estudiantil del 2020, Propuestas por Colombia: la voz de los jóvenes, de la facultad de Economía, se realizó el primer panel de discusión, llamado “Nuevos Retos y Oportunidades de la Educación en Colombia”. El evento contó con la opinión de expertos en temas académicos y educativos, que respondieron a diferentes cuestiones coyunturales. Entre ellos estuvieron Alejandro Cheyne, rector de la Universidad del Rosario, Juan David Aristizábal, educador, Mauricio Castillo, subsecretario de calidad y pertinencia de la Secretaría de Bogotá, Darwin Cortés, profesor investigador y Marcela Bautista, socióloga de la Universidad Nacional. Para nuestros expertos, entre los principales retos al que se enfrenta la educación actualmente es lograr que sea de alta calidad para todos, reevaluar el modelo de negocio para reducir las barreras de entrada, integrar las competencias duras y blandas, y lograr espacios de interacción para desarrollar habilidades socioemocionales. Por otro lado, dentro de las oportunidades generadas dentro de la crisis, están la innovación en espacios de encuentro, transformación pedagógica de roles, repensar la duración y mejorar el acceso al mundo laboral. El panel finalizó con una ronda de preguntas personalizadas para cada panelista, enfocadas según la especialidad de cada uno. La primera pregunta, acerca de la brecha entre ciudad y ruralidad en términos de educación remota, fue para Marcela, quien respondió que pese a las condiciones tan complejas que enfrentan las zonas rurales en términos de pobreza, violencia y accesibilidad a la educación remota, “como sistema educativo, nosotros no tenemos un mecanismo o una estrategia de comunicación con esa ruralidad, pero sobre todo con la ruralidad dispersa”, debido a la configuración administrativa de las secretarías de educación. La segunda pregunta, acerca de la deserción estudiantil fue para el profesor Darwin, quien respondió que efectivamente la deserción va a aumentar debido a los cambios generados por la crisis, pero que esté factor reprimirá el desarrollo económico, ya que entre más tiempo pasan los estudiantes en casa, menos tiempo tienen los padres para salir y buscar empleo. Por lo tanto, “gran parte de la solución depende de que los niños estén escolarizados, lo cual significa que, debe haber un compromiso importante por parte del gobierno para alivianar los problemas de financiación crediticia que tienen las familias”. La tercera pregunta fue, ¿cómo el emprendimiento puede responder a lo que sucede hoy?, resulta por Juan David en tres ideas principales: primero, “pensar en cómo nos educamos en mejores pedagogías para enseñar en la educación superior”, además, pensar en replantear la metodología de pago a los profesores considerando las nuevas condiciones del entorno, con el incremento en la demanda de clases grabadas que conecten emocionalmente, los profesores podrían ganar dinero monetizando sus videos. Y finalmente, “el fortalecimiento del talento de nuestros profesores en educción superior, sabiendo que tenemos hoy en día muchos más profesores en el exterior, ya que no necesitamos incurrir en el costo de traerlos físicamente”. La cuarta pregunta, fue sobre los avances que ha tenido la Alcaldía en términos infraestructura para implementar la jornada única en las instituciones y qué podría pasar con estos dada la creciente necesidad de espacios virtuales, a lo que Mauricio hizo énfasis en que hoy en día implementar la jornada única es un reto con o sin pandemia, pero que “a través de utilizar la educación remota, podríamos comenzar a ganar experiencias de cómo, en un eventual regreso post- pandemia, vamos a poder y hacer mucho más eficiente” la combinación del uso de estos espacios. Pensando en aprovechar la oportunidad que representa esta coyuntura para desarrollar la infraestructura necesaria en una situación de jornada completa. La última pregunta fue, ¿cómo van a ser las universidades después de la pandemia?, que nuestro rector respondió, resaltando la importancia del “emprendizaje”, que se define como aprender a emprender, “algunos de nosotros creemos firmemente que el emprendimiento es para todos, que no se requiere una condición socioeconómica, que no depende de ningún gen, que no depende de antecedentes familiares ni empresariales, y creemos firmemente que, el emprendimiento es una competencia que se puede desarrollar, y que, por lo tanto, como toda competencia se puede evaluar”, afirmó Cheyne, “las universidades lo que tienen que hacer es darse cuenta, realmente de su misión… uno, formar proyectos de vida, y dos, servir al país, porque para una universidad como la nuestra el servicio al país no es una alternativa, es la solución”, finalizó.
Cheyne García, José AlejandroAristizabal, Juan DavidDíaz, Bibiam AleydaCastillo Varela, MauricioOn June 3, within the framework of the 2020 National Student Forum, Proposals for Colombia: the voice of young people, from the Faculty of Economics, the first panel of discussion was held, called "New Challenges and Opportunities for Education in Colombia". The event had the opinion of experts in academic and educational subjects, who responded to different conjunctural questions. Among them were Alejandro Cheyne, rector of the Universidad del Rosario, Juan David Aristizábal, educator, Mauricio Castillo, undersecretary of quality and relevance of the Bogotá Secretariat, Darwin Cortés, research professor and Marcela Bautista, sociologist of the National University. For our experts, among the main challenges that education currently faces is to ensure that it is of high quality for all, to reevaluate the business model to reduce entry barriers, integrate hard and soft skills, and achieve interaction spaces for develop socio-emotional skills. On the other hand, among the opportunities generated within the crisis, are innovation in meeting spaces, pedagogical transformation of roles, rethinking the duration and improving access to the world of work. The panel ended with a round of personalized questions for each panelist, focused on each one's specialty. The first question, about the gap between city and rurality in terms of remote education, was for Marcela, who answered that despite the complex conditions that rural areas face in terms of poverty, violence and accessibility to remote education, " As an educational system, we do not have a mechanism or a communication strategy with that rurality, but above all with dispersed rurality ”, due to the administrative configuration of the education secretariats. The second question, about student dropout, was for Professor Darwin, who answered that effectively dropout will increase due to the changes generated by the crisis, but that this factor will repress economic development, since the more time students spend at home, the less time parents have to go out and look for work. Therefore, "much of the solution depends on the children being in school, which means that there must be a significant commitment from the government to alleviate the problems of credit financing that families have." The third question was, how can entrepreneurship respond to what is happening today? Juan David results in three main ideas: first, “think about how we educate ourselves in better pedagogies to teach in higher education”, in addition, think about Rethinking the methodology for paying teachers considering the new environmental conditions, with the increase in demand for recorded classes that connect emotionally, teachers could earn money by monetizing their videos. And finally, "the strengthening of the talent of our teachers in higher education, knowing that today we have many more teachers abroad, since we do not need to incur the cost of bringing them physically." The fourth question was about the progress that the Mayor's Office has had in terms of infrastructure to implement the single day in the institutions and what could happen to these given the growing need for virtual spaces, to which Mauricio emphasized that today implement the single day is a challenge with or without a pandemic, but that “through the use of remote education, we could begin to gain experiences of how, in an eventual post-pandemic return, we will be able and make much more efficient” the combination of use of these spaces. Thinking of taking advantage of the opportunity that this situation represents to develop the necessary infrastructure in a full-time situation. The last question was, how are universities going to be after the pandemic ?, which our rector answered, highlighting the importance of “entrepreneurship”, which is defined as learning to undertake, “some of us firmly believe that entrepreneurship is for all, that a socioeconomic condition is not required, that it does not depend on any gene, that it does not depend on family or business background, and we firmly believe that entrepreneurship is a competence that can be developed, and that, therefore, like all competence can be evaluated ", said Cheyne," what universities have to do is really realize their mission ... one, form life projects, and two, serve the country, because for a university like ours the service to The country is not an alternative, it is the solution ”, he concluded.FNE XVII 2020. Panel 2: Perspectivas financieras y bancarias en tiempos de pandemiaAlbán, AndrésLora, Carlos ErnestoPérez, CamiloCastro, Carloshttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/325642021-09-28T08:01:32Zdc.title: FNE XVII 2020. Panel 2: Perspectivas financieras y bancarias en tiempos de pandemia
dc.description.abstract: With excellent speakers and dynamic participation, the second panel of the National Student Forum of Economics and Finance was held, in which banking issues were discussed given the situation of Covid-19. Currently, the Colombian government has focused on flattening the contagion curve of Covid-19, however, this has caused a drop in productivity, income and liquidity within companies. From this, the FNE invited Andrés Albán, president of Colombia Fintech and CEO of Punto Red, Carlos Ernesto Lora, economist and partner of Giros y Finanzas, Camilo Pérez, Manager of Economic Research at Banco de Bogotá, and Carlos Castro , research professor, to deal with the subject in depth. In the first place, the responsibility of the banking sector in the recovery of the economy in the face of the reopening of trade and consumption was discussed. All the speakers agreed that, although the situation took us all by surprise, the bank has worked in an adequate, efficient and prudent manner, since it has put different mechanisms at the hands of companies and clients to be able to continue operating. In addition, they affirmed that the shock has been so fast that those who have not received support, it is not because there are no resources, but because the time has been very short for the number of requests. In summary, according to the panelists, the banking system is solid, with technical and operational problems, but with the capacity to support the country's productivity through improvement and joint work between technology companies and banks. During the panel, the speakers were also asked if it was possible for a financial crisis to come along that would join the health crisis of the pandemic. Regarding this, the speakers also concluded that given that the offices and establishments we do not close due to economic issues, but due to strict contagion prevention measures such as quarantine, it is not possible to speak of a financial crisis, since this was not its origin. They also added that special care should be taken in the "culture of non-payment" that we are having, since many people and entities, taking advantage of the pandemic and still having the resources, refuse to pay. This becomes a chain, and of course it affects the economy. They were also asked about the main challenges that banks must face to improve financial inclusion during and after the pandemic. To this, they all agreed that there is a lot of ignorance about banking, such as the use of web pages and their different methodologies and services, and it is precisely the use of digital channels that will help to overcome the crisis, in addition to guaranteeing building customer relationships. However, for our experts, to lose fear and achieve bank digitization, government support is required for awareness campaigns, and infrastructure improvement that facilitate internet access throughout the country, so that, little by little, I managed to change the mentality and fear of the financial system. Finally, the conference ended with a special question for each of the panelists who answered according to their experience and area of knowledge. Carlos Ernesto Lora, spoke about the remittances that Colombians receive from abroad, and how they would be affected by the global recession. “Recollections in Colombia and in underdeveloped countries are extremely important, for 2019 we received 6,773 million, equivalent to 2.2% of our GDP. For the first quarter of 2020, they had already decreased by 15%, however, the Banco de la República had diagnosed a drop of 40%, which shows that they have not been greatly affected, "said Lora. Camilo Pérez, referred to the sectors most affected by the situation and the financing schemes for them. “Services that are not essential, such as recreation, tourism and entertainment. Vehicle trade, for example, fell by almost 100%. Restaurants are also hit hard, mainly by quarantine. However, the question is whether the crisis in these sectors will continue, surely not, there will be a recovery, since the banks have large support projects, which will also depend on how the government allows these resources to arrive to guarantee sustainability ”, concluded Pérez. Carlos Castro, touched on the issue of the new smear law and the impact that this can have on the financial sector, especially on those who benefit from credits in Colombia. “The motivation of the law is that, ultimately, the failure of business initiatives is not so punished, and that people can, in some way, reinvent themselves financially and generate another project. Many companies fail or go bankrupt, and it is hoped that this was not an impediment to continue trying. Here the issue is to find alternative information with which to have credit information and thus not affect the bank, it is to reinvent the score that we currently know, "said Castro. Andrés Albán spoke about the role of Fintech companies, which, despite the crisis, could be less affected. "Those sectors that focus on technology or offer greater digitization, will benefit as companies begin to implement their services such as payments and digital methodologies," concluded Albán. For the Faculty of Economics and the FNE committee, it was an honor to have these excellent panelists and to be able to put such relevant issues on the table today, in addition to proposing possible solutions.
dc.description: Con excelentes conferencistas y una participación dinámica, se llevó a cabo el segundo panel del Foro Nacional Estudiantil de Economía y Finanzas, en el que se trataron temas bancarios dados la coyuntura de Covid-19. En la actualidad, el gobierno colombiano se ha centrado en aplanar la curva de contagios del Covid-19, sin embargo, esto ha ocasionado una baja de productividad, ingresos y liquidez dentro de las empresas. A partir de esto, el FNE, invitó a Andrés Albán, presiente de Colombia Fintech y CEO de Punto Red, Carlos Ernesto Lora, economista y socio de Giros y Finanzas, Camilo Pérez, Gerente de Investigaciones Económicas del Banco de Bogotá, y a Carlos Castro, profesor investigador, para tratar el tema a profundidad. En primer lugar, se habló de la responsabilidad del sector bancario en la recuperación de la economía frente a la reapertura del comercio y el consumo. Todos los conferencistas estuvieron de acuerdo en que, aunque la situación nos tomó a todos por sorpresa, la banca ha trabajado de manera adecuada, eficaz y prudente, ya que ha puesto diferentes mecanismos a la mano de empresas y clientes para poder seguir en funcionamiento. Además, afirmaron que el choque ha sido tan veloz que quienes no han recibido apoyo, no es porque no haya recursos, sino porque el tiempo ha sido muy corto para la cantidad de solicitudes. En resumen, según los panelistas, la banca se encuentra sólida, con problemas técnicos y operativos, pero con la capacidad de apoyo para la productividad del país a través del mejoramiento y el trabajo mancomunado entre las empresas de tecnología y la banca. Durante el panel, a los conferencistas también se les preguntó si era posible que llegara una crisis financiera que se uniera a la crisis sanitaria de la pandemia. En cuanto a esto, los conferencistas también concluyeron que dado a que las oficinas y establecimientos no cerramos por temas económicos, sino por las estrictas medidas de prevención del contagio como la cuarentena, no se puede hablar de una crisis financiera, ya que este no fue su origen. Agregaron, además, que se debe poner especial cuidado en la “cultura del no pago” que estamos teniendo, ya que muchas personas y entidades, aprovechando la pandemia y aún teniendo los recursos, se niegan a pagar. Esto se convierte en una cadena, y, por supuesto, afecta la economía. También se les preguntó sobre los principales retos que debe enfrentar la banca para mejorar la inclusión financiera durante y después de la pandemia. A esto, todos coincidieron en que existe mucho desconocimiento sobre la banca, como el uso de las páginas web y sus diferentes metodologías y servicios, y es justamente, el aprovechamiento de los canales digitales, lo que ayudará a superar la crisis, además de garantizar la construcción de relaciones con los clientes. Sin embargo, para nuestros expertos, para perder el miedo y lograr la digitalización bancaria, se requiere de apoyo gubernamental para campañas de conocimiento, y mejoramiento de infraestructura que faciliten el acceso a internet en todo el país, para que así, poco a poco se logre cambiar la mentalidad y el temor al sistema financiero. Finalmente, la conferencia terminó con una pregunta especial para cada uno de los panelistas que respondieron según su experiencia y área de conocimiento. Carlos Ernesto Lora, habló sobre las remesas que reciben los colombianos del exterior, y de cómo se verían afectadas por la recesión global. “Las remezas en Colombia y en países subdesarrollados son sumamente importantes, para el 2019 recibimos de 6.773 millones, un equivalente al 2.2% de nuestro PIB. Para el primer trimestre del 2020, ya habían decrecido un 15%, sin embargo, el Banco de la República había diagnosticado una baja del 40%, lo que evidencia que no se han visto muy afectadas”, afirmó Lora. Camilo Pérez, se refirió a los sectores más afectados por la coyuntura y a los esquemas de financiación para los mismos. “Los servicios que no son de primera necesidad, como la recreación, el turismo y diversión. El comercio de vehículos, por ejempló, cayó en casi un 100%. Los restaurantes también se ven muy golpeados, principalmente por la cuarentena. Sin embargo, la pregunta es si la crisis de esos sectores se va a mantener, seguramente no, va a haber una recuperación, ya que la banca tiene grandes proyectos de apoyo, que dependerán también de cómo el gobierno permita que lleguen estos recursos para garantizar la sostenibilidad”, concluyó Pérez. Carlos Castro, tocó el tema de la ley de borrón y cuanta nueva, y del impacto que esto puede tener en el sector financiero, sobre todo en aquellos que se benefician de los créditos en Colombia. “La motivación de la ley es trata de que, en últimas, no se castigue tanto el fracaso de las iniciativas empresariales, y de que la gente pueda, de alguna manera, reinventarse financieramente y generar otro proyecto. Muchas empresas fracasan o quiebran, y se quisiera que eso no fuera impedimento para seguir intentando. Aquí el tema, es encontrar información alternativa con la que se pueda tener información crediticia y así no afectar a la banca, es reinventar el score que conocemos actualmente”, dijo Castro. Andrés Albán, habló sobre el papel de las Fintech, que a pesar de la crisis podrían verse menos afectadas. “Aquellos sectores que se centran en la tecnología u ofrecen una mayor digitalización, se verán beneficiadas en la medida de que las empresas empiecen a implementar sus servicios como pagos y metodologías digitales”, finalizó Albán. Para la Facultad de Economía y el comité del FNE, fue un honor contar con estos excelentes panelistas y poder poner sobre la mesa temas tan relevantes en la actualidad, además de plantear posibles soluciones.
Albán, AndrésLora, Carlos ErnestoPérez, CamiloCastro, CarlosWith excellent speakers and dynamic participation, the second panel of the National Student Forum of Economics and Finance was held, in which banking issues were discussed given the situation of Covid-19. Currently, the Colombian government has focused on flattening the contagion curve of Covid-19, however, this has caused a drop in productivity, income and liquidity within companies. From this, the FNE invited Andrés Albán, president of Colombia Fintech and CEO of Punto Red, Carlos Ernesto Lora, economist and partner of Giros y Finanzas, Camilo Pérez, Manager of Economic Research at Banco de Bogotá, and Carlos Castro , research professor, to deal with the subject in depth. In the first place, the responsibility of the banking sector in the recovery of the economy in the face of the reopening of trade and consumption was discussed. All the speakers agreed that, although the situation took us all by surprise, the bank has worked in an adequate, efficient and prudent manner, since it has put different mechanisms at the hands of companies and clients to be able to continue operating. In addition, they affirmed that the shock has been so fast that those who have not received support, it is not because there are no resources, but because the time has been very short for the number of requests. In summary, according to the panelists, the banking system is solid, with technical and operational problems, but with the capacity to support the country's productivity through improvement and joint work between technology companies and banks. During the panel, the speakers were also asked if it was possible for a financial crisis to come along that would join the health crisis of the pandemic. Regarding this, the speakers also concluded that given that the offices and establishments we do not close due to economic issues, but due to strict contagion prevention measures such as quarantine, it is not possible to speak of a financial crisis, since this was not its origin. They also added that special care should be taken in the "culture of non-payment" that we are having, since many people and entities, taking advantage of the pandemic and still having the resources, refuse to pay. This becomes a chain, and of course it affects the economy. They were also asked about the main challenges that banks must face to improve financial inclusion during and after the pandemic. To this, they all agreed that there is a lot of ignorance about banking, such as the use of web pages and their different methodologies and services, and it is precisely the use of digital channels that will help to overcome the crisis, in addition to guaranteeing building customer relationships. However, for our experts, to lose fear and achieve bank digitization, government support is required for awareness campaigns, and infrastructure improvement that facilitate internet access throughout the country, so that, little by little, I managed to change the mentality and fear of the financial system. Finally, the conference ended with a special question for each of the panelists who answered according to their experience and area of knowledge. Carlos Ernesto Lora, spoke about the remittances that Colombians receive from abroad, and how they would be affected by the global recession. “Recollections in Colombia and in underdeveloped countries are extremely important, for 2019 we received 6,773 million, equivalent to 2.2% of our GDP. For the first quarter of 2020, they had already decreased by 15%, however, the Banco de la República had diagnosed a drop of 40%, which shows that they have not been greatly affected, "said Lora. Camilo Pérez, referred to the sectors most affected by the situation and the financing schemes for them. “Services that are not essential, such as recreation, tourism and entertainment. Vehicle trade, for example, fell by almost 100%. Restaurants are also hit hard, mainly by quarantine. However, the question is whether the crisis in these sectors will continue, surely not, there will be a recovery, since the banks have large support projects, which will also depend on how the government allows these resources to arrive to guarantee sustainability ”, concluded Pérez. Carlos Castro, touched on the issue of the new smear law and the impact that this can have on the financial sector, especially on those who benefit from credits in Colombia. “The motivation of the law is that, ultimately, the failure of business initiatives is not so punished, and that people can, in some way, reinvent themselves financially and generate another project. Many companies fail or go bankrupt, and it is hoped that this was not an impediment to continue trying. Here the issue is to find alternative information with which to have credit information and thus not affect the bank, it is to reinvent the score that we currently know, "said Castro. Andrés Albán spoke about the role of Fintech companies, which, despite the crisis, could be less affected. "Those sectors that focus on technology or offer greater digitization, will benefit as companies begin to implement their services such as payments and digital methodologies," concluded Albán. For the Faculty of Economics and the FNE committee, it was an honor to have these excellent panelists and to be able to put such relevant issues on the table today, in addition to proposing possible solutions.FNE XVII 2020. Panel 3: La industria cultural y creativa: oportunidades de innovación ante los desafíos globalesMestres, ÁngelRamirez, DiegoJiménez, MarcelaBuitrago, Felipehttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/325612021-09-28T08:03:13Zdc.title: FNE XVII 2020. Panel 3: La industria cultural y creativa: oportunidades de innovación ante los desafíos globales
dc.description.abstract: Within the framework of the XVII National Student Forum on Economics and Finance "Proposals by Colombia, The voice of the Youth", the third panel of the event was held, in which topics related to the orange economy were discussed. The panel had the participation of four representatives of the creative and cultural sector at the national and international level, who shared their points of view regarding the management and challenges faced by all the actors involved in the processes of cultural and creative production in the present, especially due to the global pandemic crisis. The Vice Minister of the Orange Economy of Colombia, Felipe Buitrago, pointed out that "the situation of the Orange Economy sector is dramatic", since the pandemic mainly affected three factors, the most evident is the economic one, where initially the over 5,600 cultural infrastructures throughout the country, secondly, the emotional one by eliminating the face-to-face spaces that linked the artists with their audience, and the third, the emotional contraction of the population, due to the changes involved in making culture more dynamic from the beginning. social distancing. For his part, Ángel Mestres, director of Transit Projectes in Barcelona, agreed that it is necessary to take urgent measures by governments to reduce the impact of the crisis, but establishing relationships of trust based on spaces for dialogue between the government and both public and private cultural sector, which take into account the development prior to the crisis, the current capacities and the future outlook that can be achieved by working in a safe and controlled manner with the cultural industries. In this sense, Marcela Jiménez, director of the Imagination in Movement, Business and Cultural Entrepreneurship program at the Ministry of Culture of Mexico, comments that, “you have to look at culture from another perspective, emphasizing four important aspects: first, you must transition from grant to investment and sponsorship. Second, the participation of social agents in cultural creation, distribution, diffusion and consumption must be encouraged. Third, an attractive offer must be generated for a more demanding social demand. And fourth, develop literacy plans in digital tools among artists on how to sell their projects in the local, national and international market ”, because, according to her, what is not seen does not exist. Finally, Diego Ramírez, founder and general producer of 64-A FILMS, focuses his analysis on the impact of cultural industries focused on audiovisual production. He highlighted that the large number of new streaming platforms have allowed exponential growth in the worldwide diffusion of productions for niche, in turn, the closure has increased the consumption of these by increasingly sophisticated and demanding consumers. "Of so many platforms that exist, they will end up with only two remaining, because the consumer will not have the ability to pay for all the platforms that exist at the moment", and this will cause some to start looking for income with the transmission of commercials such as on broadcast television. "This is the opportunity to work in what Colombia is as a content producer, as a creator of intellectual property," said Ramírez, taking advantage of existing government tools such as Law 814 that allows investment in cinema or Law 1556 that brings international projects, moving towards the production of intellectual property.
dc.description: En el marco del XVII Foro Nacional Estudiantil de Economía y Finanzas “Propuestas por Colombia, La voz de los Jóvenes”, se desarrolló el tercer panel del evento, en el que se tocaron temas relacionados con economía naranja. El panel contó con la participación de cuatro representantes del sector creativo y cultural a nivel nacional e internacional, quienes compartieron sus puntos de vista en torno a la gestión y los retos que enfrentan todos los actores involucrados en los procesos de producción cultural y creativa en la actualidad, especialmente, por la crisis de pandemia mundial. El viceministro de Economía Naranja de Colombia, Felipe Buitrago, señaló que “la situación del sector de la Economía Naranja es dramática”, ya que la pandemia afectó principalmente tres factores, el más evidente es el económico, donde de manera inicial se dio cierre a más 5.600 infraestructuras culturales en todo el país , en segundo lugar, el emocional al eliminar los espacios presenciales que unían los artistas con su audiencia, y el tercero, la contracción emocional de la población, debido a los cambios que implica dinamizar la cultura desde el distanciamiento social. Por su parte, Ángel Mestres, director de Transit Projectes en Barcelona, coincidió en que es necesario tomar medidas urgentes por parte de los gobiernos para disminuir el impacto de la crisis, pero estableciendo relaciones de confianza a partir de espacios de diálogo entre el gobierno y sector cultural tanto público como privado, que contemplen el desarrollo previo a la crisis, las capacidades actuales y el panorama futuro que se puede lograr trabajando de manera segura y controlada con las industrias culturales. En este sentido, Marcela Jiménez, directora del programa Imaginación en Movimiento, Empresas y Emprendimientos Culturales en la Secretaría de Cultura de México, comenta que, “hay que mirar la cultura desde otra perspectiva, haciendo énfasis en cuatro aspectos importantes: primero, se debe transitar de la subvención a la inversión y al patrocinio. Segundo, se debe incentivar la participación de agentes sociales en la creación, distribución, difusión y consumo cultural. Tercero, se debe generar una oferta atractiva para una demanda social más exigente. Y cuarto, desarrollar planes de alfabetización en herramientas digitales entre los artistas sobre cómo vender sus proyectos en el mercado local, nacional e internacional”, porque, según ella, lo que no se ve, no existe. Finalmente, Diego Ramírez, fundador y productor general de 64-A FILMS, centra su análisis en el impacto de las industrias culturales centradas en la producción audiovisual. Resaltó que, la gran cantidad de nuevas plataformas de streaming han permitido crecimientos exponenciales en la difusión mundial de producciones para nicho, a su vez, el encerramiento ha incrementado el consumo de estas por consumidores cada vez más sofisticados y exigentes. “De tantas plataformas que existen, van a terminar quedando solo dos, porque el consumidor no va a tener la capacidad de pagar todas las plataformas que hay en este momento”, y esto generará que algunas empiecen a buscar ingresos con la transmisión de comerciales como en la televisión abierta. “Esta es la oportunidad de trabajar en lo que es Colombia como productor de contenidos, como creador de propiedad intelectual”, afirmó Ramírez, aprovechando herramientas gubernamentales existentes como la Ley 814 que permite inversión en el cine o la Ley 1556 que trae proyectos internacionales, moviéndose hacia la producción de propiedad intelectual.
Mestres, ÁngelRamirez, DiegoJiménez, MarcelaBuitrago, FelipeWithin the framework of the XVII National Student Forum on Economics and Finance "Proposals by Colombia, The voice of the Youth", the third panel of the event was held, in which topics related to the orange economy were discussed. The panel had the participation of four representatives of the creative and cultural sector at the national and international level, who shared their points of view regarding the management and challenges faced by all the actors involved in the processes of cultural and creative production in the present, especially due to the global pandemic crisis. The Vice Minister of the Orange Economy of Colombia, Felipe Buitrago, pointed out that "the situation of the Orange Economy sector is dramatic", since the pandemic mainly affected three factors, the most evident is the economic one, where initially the over 5,600 cultural infrastructures throughout the country, secondly, the emotional one by eliminating the face-to-face spaces that linked the artists with their audience, and the third, the emotional contraction of the population, due to the changes involved in making culture more dynamic from the beginning. social distancing. For his part, Ángel Mestres, director of Transit Projectes in Barcelona, agreed that it is necessary to take urgent measures by governments to reduce the impact of the crisis, but establishing relationships of trust based on spaces for dialogue between the government and both public and private cultural sector, which take into account the development prior to the crisis, the current capacities and the future outlook that can be achieved by working in a safe and controlled manner with the cultural industries. In this sense, Marcela Jiménez, director of the Imagination in Movement, Business and Cultural Entrepreneurship program at the Ministry of Culture of Mexico, comments that, “you have to look at culture from another perspective, emphasizing four important aspects: first, you must transition from grant to investment and sponsorship. Second, the participation of social agents in cultural creation, distribution, diffusion and consumption must be encouraged. Third, an attractive offer must be generated for a more demanding social demand. And fourth, develop literacy plans in digital tools among artists on how to sell their projects in the local, national and international market ”, because, according to her, what is not seen does not exist. Finally, Diego Ramírez, founder and general producer of 64-A FILMS, focuses his analysis on the impact of cultural industries focused on audiovisual production. He highlighted that the large number of new streaming platforms have allowed exponential growth in the worldwide diffusion of productions for niche, in turn, the closure has increased the consumption of these by increasingly sophisticated and demanding consumers. "Of so many platforms that exist, they will end up with only two remaining, because the consumer will not have the ability to pay for all the platforms that exist at the moment", and this will cause some to start looking for income with the transmission of commercials such as on broadcast television. "This is the opportunity to work in what Colombia is as a content producer, as a creator of intellectual property," said Ramírez, taking advantage of existing government tools such as Law 814 that allows investment in cinema or Law 1556 that brings international projects, moving towards the production of intellectual property.FNE XVII 2020. Panel Jóvenes: Retos de la educación en ColombiaSanchez, AlejandraOspina, HugoErazo, Andréshttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/325602021-09-28T08:01:27Zdc.title: FNE XVII 2020. Panel Jóvenes: Retos de la educación en Colombia
dc.description.abstract: This panel was held on June 12, 2020, participated: Hugo Ospina; Alejandra Sanchez; Andrés Erazo and Moderó: Juan David Mateus. In this conversational space, the young people addressed elements related to education as a right and the state financing process. Posing positions around the program to be pilo paga, the need for protective environments that guarantee the educational permanence of children and young people. In the same way, they presented their points of view in relation to the educational gaps in Colombia.
dc.description: Este panel fue llevado a cabo el 12 de Junio de 2020, participaron: Hugo Ospina; Alejandra Sanchez; Andrés Erazo y Moderó: Juan David Mateus. En este espacio conversacional los jóvenes abordaron elementos referentes a la educación como un derecho y los proceso de financiación estatal. Planteando posturas en torno al programa ser pilo paga, la necesidad de entonos protectores que garanticen la permanencia educativa de los niños y jóvenes. De igual forma expusieron sus puntos de vista en relación a las brechas educativas en Colombia.
Sanchez, AlejandraOspina, HugoErazo, AndrésThis panel was held on June 12, 2020, participated: Hugo Ospina; Alejandra Sanchez; Andrés Erazo and Moderó: Juan David Mateus. In this conversational space, the young people addressed elements related to education as a right and the state financing process. Posing positions around the program to be pilo paga, the need for protective environments that guarantee the educational permanence of children and young people. In the same way, they presented their points of view in relation to the educational gaps in Colombia.FNE XVII 2020. Reto grupal: Propuesta de política pública para los municipiosGarcía, Oscar GuillermoLima, Juan SebastiánJiménez, María CamilaGarcés, SaraRincón Briceño, Juan JoséEcheverri Marcus, GabrielMolina Abad, Juan EstebanOtoya, José MaríaSalcedo, María PaulaCastro Blanco, MarianaCastillo, María FernandaCarabello, María CamilaCuesta, LisbethRentería, YaletzaIsaza Restrepo, AndrésPalacio, María PaulaGoebertus, JuanitaOtero Bahamon, Silvia AlejandraSaavedra Pineda, Santiagohttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/325592021-09-28T08:01:32Zdc.title: FNE XVII 2020. Reto grupal: Propuesta de política pública para los municipios
dc.description.abstract: The National Student Forum of Economics and Finance (FNE), counted in its group challenge with more than 200 students nationwide, distributed in 62 teams, belonging to 22 universities. Last Friday, September 4, we met the winners of this challenge, which consisted of creating public policy proposals for the reactivation of Colombian municipalities after Covid-19. This new version of the FNE has been full of challenges and new experiences, since, thanks to virtuality, we were able to meet more students concerned about the participation and reactivation of vulnerable municipalities in the territory. "We created this challenge to give a voice to young people from different areas and knowledge, highlighting that when it comes to the development of sustainable economic development, interdisciplinarity is essential," said Carlos Holguin, one of the directors of this Forum. Carlos Sepúlveda, dean of the UR Faculty of Economics, congratulated all the participants and highlighted the leadership and capacity for adaptation and innovation on the part of the students given the complex situation, ensuring the importance of “the voice of young economists and financiers in finding solutions to very difficult realities ”. Among the jurors of this challenge, were Juanita Goebertus, representative to the Chamber for Bogotá, magister in Law from Harvard University and expert in peace, transitional justice and post-conflict. Silvia Otero-Bahamon, Senior Lecturer in the School of Political Science, Government and International Relations at Universidad del Rosario, with a PhD in Political Science from Northwestern University. And, Santiago Saavedra, Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics at Universidad del Rosario, with a PhD in Economics from Stanford University. We invite you to meet the five finalist teams in this challenge, along with their proposals and initiatives: - Group 1- Municipality of Corinto: Made up of four students from the Universidad del Rosario, who were also the winners of this challenge for their innovation and taking advantage of the current situation for the economic reactivation of the municipality. His proposal was based on the investment in roads through the Rural Colombia Plan, construction of temporary rural aqueducts in the short term and permanent in the long term, local production of antibacterial gel from local inputs and traditional techniques of the Nasa community and implementation of the viva fridge plan for food security and sovereignty with a differentiated approach. - Group 2 - Municipality of Puerto Caicedo: Made up of students from Universidad del Rosario, Universidad de los Andes and Universidad ICESI. They based their proposal on coca crops for medicinal use, sustainable use of the environment, and promotion of productive activities adaptable to their regional conditions, we seek to improve the productivity of Puerto Caicedo. Group 3 - Municipality of Valle del Guamez: Made up of students from the Universidad de los Andes. They presented a short-term proposal for a return to agriculture focused on the region's own crops with alliances with Corpocampo, Coprocaguamez and Asapiv. For the medium term, a digitization of the value proposition through the Frubana virtual store. And, in the long term, the adaptation and improvement of the ways to achieve the export and transport of products. - Group 4- Municipality of Bojayá: Made up of students from the Universidad del Rosario and the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, who ranked second in this challenge, due to its social sense. They based their proposal on the solidarity economy as an option worth exploring for social development in post-conflict territories. Thus, by massifying the delivery of biosafety elements, associating and training the river transporters of Bojayá and investing in better port infrastructure, we will impact this municipality in the short, medium and long term. - Group 5 - Municipality of El Tambo: Made up of students from the National University of Colombia. They presented a proposal for reactivation committed to the agricultural producer of El Tambo and its traditional products. An alternative to illicit crops, in search of peace, prosperity and economic stability in the region. On behalf of the Faculty of Economics and the organization of the FNE, we thank all the participating students for their enthusiasm to create and build a country based on sustainable and beneficial solutions for our communities. Also, we congratulate the finalist and winning teams, since they all made a valuable part that will allow us to show solidarity with these territories and to think creatively about the post-Covid-19 reactivation.
dc.description: El Foro Nacional Estudiantil de Economía y Finanzas (FNE), contó en su reto grupal con más de 200 estudiantes a nivel nacional, distribuidos en 62 equipos, pertenecientes a 22 universidades. El pasado viernes 4 de septiembre, conocimos a los ganadores de este reto, que consistía en crear propuestas de política pública para la reactivación de municipios colombianos tras el Covid-19. Esta nueva versión del FNE, ha estado llena de retos y nuevas experiencias, ya que, gracias a la virtualidad, logramos conocer más estudiantes preocupados por la participación y reactivación de los municipios vulnerables del territorio. “Creamos este reto para darles voz a los jóvenes de diferentes áreas y conocimientos, resaltando que cuando se trata del desarrollo del desarrollo económico sostenible, la interdisciplinariedad es fundamental”, afirmó Carlos Holguin, uno de los directores de este Foro. Carlos Sepúlveda, decano de la Facultad de Economía UR, felicitó a todos los participantes y destacó el liderazgo y la capacidad de adaptación e innovación por parte de los estudiantes dada la compleja coyuntura, asegurando la importancia de “la voz de los jóvenes economistas y financieros en encontrar soluciones a realidades muy difíciles”. Dentro de los jurados de este reto, se encontraban Juanita Goebertus, representante a la Cámara por Bogotá, magister en Derecho de la Universidad de Harvard y experta en paz, justicia transicional y postconflicto. Silvia Otero-Bahamon, profesora principal de la Escuela de Ciencia Política, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad del Rosario, con un PhD en Ciencia Política de la Universidad de Northwestern. Y, Santiago Saavedra, profesor principal de la Facultad de Economía de la Universidad del Rosario, con PhD en Economía de la Universidad de Stanford. Los invitamos a conocer los cinco equipos finalistas de este reto, junto con sus propuestas e iniciativas: - Grupo 1- Municipio de Corinto: "Propuesta de política pública para la reactivación de Corinto, Cauca" Conformado por cuatro estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario, quienes además fueron los ganadores de este reto por su innovación y aprovechamiento de la situación actual para la reactivación económica del municipio. Su propuesta se basó en la inversión en vías a través del Plan Colombia Rural, construcción de acueductos rurales temporales en el corto plazo y permanentes en el largo, producción local de gel antibacterial a partir de insumos locales y técnicas tradicionales de la comunidad Nasa e implementación del plan nevera viva para la seguridad y la soberanía alimentaria con enfoque diferenciado. - Grupo 2 – Municipio de Puerto Caicedo: "Recomendaciones de Política Pública en Puerto Caicedo, Putumayo" Conformado por estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario, Universidad de los Andes y la Universidad ICESI. Basaron su propuesta a través de cultivos de coca para uso medicinal, aprovechamiento sostenible del medio ambiente, y promoción de actividades productivas adaptables a sus condiciones regionales, buscamos mejorar la productividad de Puerto Caicedo. Grupo 3 – Municipio de Valle del Guamez: "Reapertura económica en Valle del Guamuez bajo la coyuntura del COVID-19" Conformado por estudiantes de la Universidad de los Andes. Presentaron una propuesta a corto plazo de retorno a la agricultura enfocada en los cultivos propios de la región con alianzas con Corpocampo, Coprocaguamez y Asapiv. Para mediano plazo, una digitalización de la propuesta de valor a través de la tienda virtual Frubana. Y, a largo plazo, la adecuación y el mejoramiento de las vías para lograr la exportación y transporte de productos. - Grupo 4- Municipio de Bojayá: "Bojayá conectado, Bojayá seguro" Conformado por estudiantes de la Universidad del Rosario y la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, quienes ocuparon el segundo lugar de este reto, por su sentido social. Basaron su propuesta a partir de la economía solidaria como una opción que vale la pena explorar para el desarrollo social en territorios de postconflicto. Así pues, masificando la entrega de elementos de bioseguridad, asociando y capacitando a los transportadores fluviales de Bojayá e invirtiendo en mejor infraestructura portuaria, impactaremos en este municipio en el corto, mediano y largo plazo. - Grupo 5 – Municipio de El Tambo: "Propuesta de reactivación económica para El Tambo: El futuro es campesino" Conformado por estudiantes de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Presentaron una propuesta de reactivación comprometida con el productor agrícola de El Tambo y sus productos tradicionales. Una alternativa a los cultivos ilícitos, en busca de la paz, la prosperidad y la estabilidad económica de la región. En nombre de la Facultad de Economía y la organización del FNE, agradecemos a todos los estudiantes participantes por su entusiasmo de crear y construir país a partir de soluciones sostenibles y beneficiosas para nuestras comunidades. También, felicitamos a los equipos finalistas y ganadores, ya que todos, realizaron un aparte valioso que nos permitirá solidarizarnos con estos territorios y a pensar creativamente en la reactivación pos Covid-19.
García, Oscar GuillermoLima, Juan SebastiánJiménez, María CamilaGarcés, SaraRincón Briceño, Juan JoséEcheverri Marcus, GabrielMolina Abad, Juan EstebanOtoya, José MaríaSalcedo, María PaulaCastro Blanco, MarianaCastillo, María FernandaCarabello, María CamilaCuesta, LisbethRentería, YaletzaIsaza Restrepo, AndrésPalacio, María PaulaGoebertus, JuanitaOtero Bahamon, Silvia AlejandraSaavedra Pineda, SantiagoThe National Student Forum of Economics and Finance (FNE), counted in its group challenge with more than 200 students nationwide, distributed in 62 teams, belonging to 22 universities. Last Friday, September 4, we met the winners of this challenge, which consisted of creating public policy proposals for the reactivation of Colombian municipalities after Covid-19. This new version of the FNE has been full of challenges and new experiences, since, thanks to virtuality, we were able to meet more students concerned about the participation and reactivation of vulnerable municipalities in the territory. "We created this challenge to give a voice to young people from different areas and knowledge, highlighting that when it comes to the development of sustainable economic development, interdisciplinarity is essential," said Carlos Holguin, one of the directors of this Forum. Carlos Sepúlveda, dean of the UR Faculty of Economics, congratulated all the participants and highlighted the leadership and capacity for adaptation and innovation on the part of the students given the complex situation, ensuring the importance of “the voice of young economists and financiers in finding solutions to very difficult realities ”. Among the jurors of this challenge, were Juanita Goebertus, representative to the Chamber for Bogotá, magister in Law from Harvard University and expert in peace, transitional justice and post-conflict. Silvia Otero-Bahamon, Senior Lecturer in the School of Political Science, Government and International Relations at Universidad del Rosario, with a PhD in Political Science from Northwestern University. And, Santiago Saavedra, Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics at Universidad del Rosario, with a PhD in Economics from Stanford University. We invite you to meet the five finalist teams in this challenge, along with their proposals and initiatives: - Group 1- Municipality of Corinto: Made up of four students from the Universidad del Rosario, who were also the winners of this challenge for their innovation and taking advantage of the current situation for the economic reactivation of the municipality. His proposal was based on the investment in roads through the Rural Colombia Plan, construction of temporary rural aqueducts in the short term and permanent in the long term, local production of antibacterial gel from local inputs and traditional techniques of the Nasa community and implementation of the viva fridge plan for food security and sovereignty with a differentiated approach. - Group 2 - Municipality of Puerto Caicedo: Made up of students from Universidad del Rosario, Universidad de los Andes and Universidad ICESI. They based their proposal on coca crops for medicinal use, sustainable use of the environment, and promotion of productive activities adaptable to their regional conditions, we seek to improve the productivity of Puerto Caicedo. Group 3 - Municipality of Valle del Guamez: Made up of students from the Universidad de los Andes. They presented a short-term proposal for a return to agriculture focused on the region's own crops with alliances with Corpocampo, Coprocaguamez and Asapiv. For the medium term, a digitization of the value proposition through the Frubana virtual store. And, in the long term, the adaptation and improvement of the ways to achieve the export and transport of products. - Group 4- Municipality of Bojayá: Made up of students from the Universidad del Rosario and the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, who ranked second in this challenge, due to its social sense. They based their proposal on the solidarity economy as an option worth exploring for social development in post-conflict territories. Thus, by massifying the delivery of biosafety elements, associating and training the river transporters of Bojayá and investing in better port infrastructure, we will impact this municipality in the short, medium and long term. - Group 5 - Municipality of El Tambo: Made up of students from the National University of Colombia. They presented a proposal for reactivation committed to the agricultural producer of El Tambo and its traditional products. An alternative to illicit crops, in search of peace, prosperity and economic stability in the region. On behalf of the Faculty of Economics and the organization of the FNE, we thank all the participating students for their enthusiasm to create and build a country based on sustainable and beneficial solutions for our communities. Also, we congratulate the finalist and winning teams, since they all made a valuable part that will allow us to show solidarity with these territories and to think creatively about the post-Covid-19 reactivation.