Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection

Título de la revista
Autores
Olsson S.-E.
Kjaer S.K.
Sigurdsson K.
Iversen O.-E.
Hernandez-Avila M.
Wheeler C.M.
Perez, Gonzalo
Brown D.R.
Koutsky L.A.
Tay E.H.

Fecha
2009

Directores

ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor

Buscar en:

Métricas alternativas

Resumen
Abstract
Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed. Results: Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment. Methods: 18,174 women were enrolled into three clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for ?1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment. Conclusions: These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences. © 2009 Landes Bioscience.
Palabras clave
Keywords
Placebo , viral , Silgard , Unclassified drug , Virus dna , Wart virus vaccine , Adolescent , Adult , Article , Bronchospasm , Controlled study , Drug efficacy , Drug fatality , Drug tolerability , Drug withdrawal , Female , Gastroenteritis , Genital system examination , Gynecologic disease , Headache , Human , Human papillomavirus type 11 , Human papillomavirus type 16 , Human papillomavirus type 18 , Human papillomavirus type 6 , Human tissue , Hypertension , Injection site reaction , Major clinical study , Papanicolaou test , Prophylaxis , Serology , Unspecified side effect , Uterine cervix disease , Verruca vulgaris , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies , Cervix uteri , Female , Follow-up studies , Humans , Papillomavirus infections , Papillomavirus vaccines , Placebos , Vulva , Young adult , Cervical cancer , Hpv , Vaccine
Buscar en:
Colecciones