Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Lineamientos académicos para la apreciación de la docencia por parte de los estudiantes en la Universidad del Rosario

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.gruplacGrupo de Investigación en Educación y Desarrollospa
dc.creatorNavarro-Botero, María del Rosario
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-04T17:54:54Z
dc.date.available2020-05-04T17:54:54Z
dc.date.created2020-05-06
dc.descriptionEl presente documento sintetiza el trabajo relacionado con la actualización conceptual y metodológica de la evaluación integral de profesores. Esta se define como un proceso formativo, continuo, sistemático e integral, que contribuye a la excelencia y al mejoramiento permanente del cuerpo profesoral, promueve la participación de la comunidad académica, involucra las diferentes actividades que realizan los profesores y reconoce su compromiso institucional; elementos todos fundamentales que hacen posible la aspiración de ser una universidad centrada en el aprender a aprender.spa
dc.description.abstractThis document summarizes the work related to the conceptual and methodological updating of the comprehensive evaluation of teachers. This is defined as a continuous, systematic and comprehensive training process, which contributes to excellence and permanent improvement of the teaching staff, promotes the participation of the academic community, involves the different activities carried out by teachers and recognizes their institutional commitment; all fundamental elements that make possible the aspiration of being a university focused on learning to learn.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_21851
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 2500-5979
dc.identifier.issnISSNE: 2500-6150
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/21851
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentCentro de Enseñanza, Aprendizaje y Trayectoria Profesoral - CEAPspa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 21
dc.relation.citationTitleReflexiones Pedagógicas Urosario
dc.relation.ispartofReflexiones Pedagógicas URosario, ISSN 2500-5979 ; ISSNE 2500-6150 Numero 21, (Mayo de 2020) pp. 12spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAllen, M. (2004). Assessing academic programs in higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbrami Philip, C. (2002). Improving Judgments About Teaching Effectiveness Using Teacher Rating Forms. Recuperado de https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.4spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAprendizaje basado en Retos. Edutrends. Observatorio de innovación educativa del Tecnológico de Monterrey. 2016. Recuperado de https://observatorio.tec.mx/edutrendsabrspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBain, K. (2007). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores universitarios. Barcelona: Universitat de Valènciaspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaker, E. (2014). Learning and assessment: TwentyFirst Century skills and cognitive readiness. In O’Neil, H., R. Perez, & E. Baker (Eds.) Teaching and Measuring Cognitive Readiness (pp. 53-70). New York: Springer.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeran, T., Violato, C., & Kline D. (2007). What’s the “Use” of Student Ratings of Instruction for Administrators? One University’s Experience. Canadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur, 37(1), 27-43. Recuperado de www.ingentaconnect. com/content/csshe/cjhespa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrockx, B., Van Roy, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2012). The student as a commentator: students’ comments in student evaluations of teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (69), 1122-1133. Recuperado de https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1877042812055024spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarr, D. (2011). Values, virtues and professional development in education and teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 171-176. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijer.2011.07.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCasero, A. (2010). Factores moduladores de la percepción de la calidad docente. Relieve, 16(2), 1-17. Recuperado de ttp://www.uv.es/ RELIEVE/v16n2/RELIEVEv16n2_3.htmspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDarling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Recuperado de https://edpolicy. stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/ creating-comprehensive-system-evaluating-andsupporting-effective-teaching.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGoldman, Z. W., Cranmerb, G. A. Sollittoc, M., & Labelled, S. (2016). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Communication Education, 1479-5795. Recuperado de https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/311732322_ What_do_college_students_want_A_ prioritization_of_instructional_behaviors_and_ characteristicsspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGoldman, Z., Cranmerb, G., Sollittoc, M., Labelled, S., & Lancastere, A. (2017). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Journal Communication Education, 66(3), 280-298.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Toronto: Universidad de Toronto.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends. Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Recuperado de http:// www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/ Student%20Course%20Evaluations.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHodges, L., & Stanton, K. (2006). Translating Comments on Student Evaluations into the Language of Learning. Berlín: Springer ScienceBusiness Media.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKrešimir, P., Banek Zorica, M., & Pongrac, A. (2011). Student perception of teaching quality in higher education. 2011. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2288-2292.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKulik, J. A. (2002). Studente Ratings: Validity, Utility, and Controversy. New Directions For Institutional Research, (109), 9-25. https://doi. org/10.1002/ir.1spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarsh, H. W. (1984). Students evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Pontial Biases, and Utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, (76), 707-54.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcMillan, J. H. (2007). Formative Classroom Assessment: The key to improving student achievement. Formative Classroom Assessment: Theory into practice. New York: Teacher College Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMiller, K. (2002). Empathy in Higher Education Not Just for Counselors Anymore Recuperado de https://aahea.org/articles/2002-10-feature01_1. htmspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMontoya Vargas, J., & Ramírez M. I. (2013). Modelos de evaluación docente en la Universidad: pasado, presente y futuro. Revista Historia de la Educación Colombiana. 16(16), 273-300.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127-135.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchemelkin, L. P., Spencer, K. J., & Gellman, E. S. (1987). Faculty Perspectives on Course and Teacher Evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 38(5), 575-592.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSpooren, P., & Van Loona, F. (2012). Who participates (not)? A non-response analysis on students’ evaluations of teaching. Presentado en International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (iceepsy). University of Antwerp, Belgium.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSvinicki, M. D. (2002). Encouraging Your Students to Give Feedback. Recuperado de https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tl.24spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectEvaluación integralspa
dc.subjectProfesoresspa
dc.subjectExcelencia docentespa
dc.subjectCuerpo profesoralspa
dc.subjectApreciación de la docenciaspa
dc.subject.ddcEducación superiorspa
dc.subject.keywordComprehensive evaluationspa
dc.subject.keywordTeachersspa
dc.subject.keywordTeaching excellencespa
dc.subject.keywordFacultyspa
dc.subject.keywordTeaching appreciationspa
dc.titleLineamientos académicos para la apreciación de la docencia por parte de los estudiantes en la Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.title.alternativeAcademic guidelines for the appreciation of teaching by students at the Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Reflexiones 21_Web.pdf
Tamaño:
807.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Centro de Enseñanza, Aprendizaje y Trayectoria Profesoral - CEAP