Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Innovación, supervivencia y generación de empleo: evidencia para Colombia

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorMuñoz Martínez, Francisco Manuel
dc.contributor.advisorPrem, Mounu
dc.creatorOrtiz Medina, Mónica Lorena
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en economía de las políticas públicasspa
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-05T13:49:55Z
dc.date.available2020-06-05T13:49:55Z
dc.date.created2020-06-02
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este documento es evaluar el impacto del programa Alianzas para la Innovación en sus fases 2 y 3 que fueron llevadas a cabo entre los años 2015-2017. Este programa de promoción de la innovación forma a los empresarios para desarrollar prototipos de innovación, es ejecutado por las Cámaras de Comercio de Colombia bajo la coordinación y soporte financiero de Confecámaras y Colciencias. A partir de los registros administrativos RUES y PILA se captura la información longitudinal para las empresas para el periodo 2013-2018 y se evalúa el impacto del programa sobre la supervivencia empresarial a cinco años y la generación de empleo formal para aquellas empresas que implementaron su prototipo de innovación. Para llevar a cabo la evaluación se utilizan modelos de duración para el caso de las estimaciones de supervivencia y se realiza una combinación de propensity score matching y diferencias en diferencias para el caso del empleo. Los resultados muestran que después de emparejar las empresas y controlar por características que no varían en el tiempo, el programa tiene un efecto positivo y significativo sobre la tasa de supervivencia de las empresas tratadas en el marco de la formalidad de 5 pp y el efecto sobre la creación de empleo es nulo. Adicionalmente se encuentra un efecto diferencial en la tasa de supervivencia. Es más alto para las empresas que innovan en producto sobre las que lo hacen en proceso, así mismo se encuentra un efecto para las empresas que capacitan sus empleados tipo blue collar mostrando la importancia de la orientación al aprendizaje y el desempeño de la empresa.spa
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of “Alianzas para la Innovación” program in its phases 2 and 3 that were implemented between 2015-2017. This innovation promotion program trains firms to develop innovation prototypes, it is executed by the Colombian Chambers of Commerce under the coordination and financial support of Confecámaras and Colciencias. The results show that after matching the firms and controlling for characteristics that do not vary over time, the program has a positive and significant effect of the 5 pp in the survival rate of firms treated and there is not effect on employment. Additionally, there is a differential effect in the survival rate. It is higher for firms that innovate in products compared to those that innovate in process, and there is an effect for firms whose blue-collar employees are trained, showing that learning-oriented firms support firm performance.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_24495
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24495
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en economía de las políticas públicasspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAerts, K., & Czarnitzki, D. Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate RD Policy: The Case of Belgium. Discussion Paper 05-55, ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research, 2004.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAboal D., Rojas G., Serv n B., & Queralt o P. How E ective are Innovation Support Programs to Stimulate Innovation? Evidence from Paraguay. Discussion Paper 05-55, ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research, 2004.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlvarez, R.,& Crespi, G. Exporter Performance and Promotion Instruments: Chilean Empirical Evidence. Estudios de Economia, 27(2), 225-24, 2000.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngrist, J.D.,& Pishke, J.S. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAtkinson, R. & Ezell, S. Innovation economics. New Haven: Yale University Press., 2012.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAshcroft B., Love J.H., & Malloy E. New rm formation in the British counties with special reference to Scotland. Regional Studies, Vol 25, pp 395-409, 1991.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAudretsch, D. Innovation, growth and survival. International journal of Industrial Organization, 13:441-457, 1995.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAudretsch, D., & Mahmood, T. New rm survival: New results using a hazard function. The review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 77, 1:97-103, 1995.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAudretsch, D., & Fritsch, M. Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, Vol 36.2, pp 113-124, 2002.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAudretsch, D., Falck, O., Heblich, S.,& Laderer, A. Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (USA): Edwrd Elgar, 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBarrios F., Forero C., & Perry, G., Public nancial support and innovation in Colombian manu- facturing rms. Working paper;N 2018/07, Caracas: CAF, 2017.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaptista, R., Esc aria, V., &Madruga, P. Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: The case of Portugal. Small Business Economics, 30, 49-58, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBenavente, J. M., & Crespi, G. The Impact of an Associative Strategy (the PROFO Program) on Small and Medium Enterprises in Chile. SEWPS Paper 88, 2003.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBenavente, J. M., Crespi, G., & Ma oli, A. Public support to rm-level innovation: An evalua- tion of FONTEC Program. Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE). Washington D.C.: Inter- American Development Bank, 2007.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBenavente, J. M., Suazo, J., & Castillo, E. Evaluaci on de los resultados econ omicos de los proyectos de innovación y tecnología financiados por FONTEC. Universidad de Chile, 2004.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBenavente, J.M., & R. Lauterbach Technological innovation and employment: Complements or substitutes. European Journal of Development Research 20: 318{29, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBinelli C., & Ma oli, A. A Micro-econometric Analysis of Public Support to Private RD in Argentina. International Review of Applied Economics 21(3):339-359, 2007.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBorrego, C., & Collado D. INNOVATION AND JOB CREATION AND DESTRUCTION De Boeck Superieur, Recherches economiques de Louvain 2002/1 Vol. 68, pages 148 a 168, 2002.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoyer, T., & Blazy, R. Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Bus Econ 42:669-683, 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBuddelmeyer, H., Jensen, P., & Webster, E. Innovation and the determinants of company survi- val. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(2), 261-285, 2010.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDel Canto J., Gonzalez I. A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a fi rm's RD activities. Research Policy, Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 891-905, 1999.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCader, H. & Leatherman, J. Small business survival and sample selection bias. Small Business Economics, 37,155-165, 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCe fis, E. & Marsili, O. A Matter of Life and Death:Innovation and Firm Survival. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2004-109-ORG, 2004.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChristensen, M. C. The Innovator's Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChudnovsky, D., Lopez, A., Rossi, M., & Ubfal, D. Evaluating a program of public funding of private innovation activities. An econometric study of FONTAR in Argentina. Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE). Washington D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank., 2006.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCOLCIENCIAS & Confederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Programa Alianzas por la Innovacion: Manual Operativo, Modelo Estructural y Operacional., 2016.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCox, D.R. Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), Vol 34, 2: 187-220, 1972.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCrespi, G., Mafioli, A. & Melendez, M. Public support to innovation: the colombian COLCIENCIAS' experience. Social Sector Science and Technology Division. Inter-American Devolpment Bank., 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCrespi, G., & Zuniga P. Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. World Development 40(2), 2012.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCriscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H., & Van Reenen, J. The Effects of Industrial Policy on Corporate Performance: Evidence from Panel Data. Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 2007.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Guia Ruta de la Innovacion. 2016.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Nacimiento y supervivencia de las empresas en Colombia. 2016.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Determinantes de la super- vivencia empresarial en Colombia. 2017.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Manual de Demografia Empresarial adaptado para Colombia. 2019.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfederacion Colombiana de Camaras de Comercio, Confecamaras. Apuestas dinamizadoras del Desarrollo productivo Colombia. 2017.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Negri, J. A., Borges Lemos, M., & De Negri, F. Impact of RD Incentive Program on the Performance and Technological Efforts of Brazilian Industrial Firms. Washington D.C.: Inter- American Development Bank, 2006.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDisney R., Haskel J. & Heden Y.. Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing., Journal of Industrial Economics, 51: 91-112, 2003.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDepartamento Nacional de Planeacion. CONPES 3834: Incentivos tributarios para la CTI. , 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDepartamento Nacional de Planeacion. CONPES 3835: Formacion del capital humano en el exterior, 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDepartamento Nacional de Planeacion. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2014-2018: Todos por un nuevo pags, 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDepartamento Nacional de Planeacion. POLITICA NACIONAL DE CIENCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INNOVACION 2015-2025 (Borrador), 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEurostat/OECD. EUROSTAT - OECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics. European Commission, 2007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFernandez Informalidad empresarial en Colombia. Working paper No. 76, Fedesarrollo, 2018.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFlynn, B., Wu S., & Melnyk S. Operational capabilities: hidden in plain view. Harvard Business Reviewspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGiuliodori, D. & Stucchi, R. Innovation and job creation in a dual labor market: evidence from Spain. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21:8, 801-813, 2012.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHall, B., F. Lotti, & J. Mairesse. Employment, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from Italian microdata.. Working Paper Series 2006-43, United Nations University, Maastricht, The Netherlands., 2006.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. Does innovation stimulate employment? A fi rm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 35, 29-43, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHolmes P., Hunt, A. & Stone, I. An analysis of new fi rm survival using a hazard function. Applied Economics 42: 185-195, 2010.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHussinger K. RD and subsidies at the fi rm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 03-63, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJarmin, R. Manufacturing Extension and Productivity Dynamics. Working Papers 98-8, US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, 1998.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJarmin, R. Evaluating the Impact of Manufacturing Extension on Productivity Growth. Journal of Policy Analysis, 18(1), 99-119, 1999.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKoufteros, X., Verghese, A., & Lucianetti, L. The effect of performance measurement systems on fi rm performance: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. Journal of Operations Management, Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 313-336, 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKhandker, S., Koolwal, G., & Samad, H. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington D.C.: International Bank for Reconstriction and Development / The World Bank, 2010.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKlette, T.J., & Forre, S.E. Innovation and job creation in a small open economy: Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing plants 1982{92s.Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5: 247-72., 1998.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLin, J.Y.., & Monga, C. Growth Identi cation and Facilitation. The role of the state in the dynamic of structural change.Policy Research Working Paper 5313. World Bank, Development Economics. Office of the Vice President, 2010.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMata, J., & Portugal, P. The survival of new plants: start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Volume 13, Issue 4, 459-481 , 1995.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMajon-Antolin, M. Arauzo-Carod, J. Firm survival: methods and evidence. Empirica 35: 1-24, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMole, K., Hart, M., Roper, S., & Saal, D. Di erential Gains from Business Link Support and Advise: A Treatment E ects Approach. EPC: Government and Policy, 26, 315-334, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMorris, M., & Stevens, P. Evaluation of the Growth Services Range: Statistical analysis using firm-based performance data. Research and Evaluation, Ministry of Economic Development, Government of New Zealand, 2009.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMorris, D. Innovation and productivity among heterogeneous fi rms. Research Policy Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 1918-1932, 2018.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMotohashi, K. Use of Plant-Level Micro-Data for the Evaluation of SME Innovation Policy in Japan. Paris: OECD, 2002.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOECD Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Ex- perimental Development, The Measurement of Scienti c, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOECD/Eurostat Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4 ed.). Luxemburgo: OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, 2018.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOzcelik, E., & Taymaz, E. Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (USA): Edwrd Elgar, 2008.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPessoa, A. Innovation and Knowledge Economics. Charleston: CreateSpace, 2012.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPiva, M. & Vivarelli, M. Innovation and employment, evidence from Italian microdata. Journal of Economics, 86, 65-83, 2005.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReid, G. & Smith, J. What makes a new business startup successful?.Small Business Economics, 14, 165{182, 2000.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRevesz, J. & Lattimore, R. Statistical Analysis of the Use and Impact of Government Business Programs. Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper, Canberra, 2001.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationResende, M., Cardoso, V. & Facanha, L. Determinants of survival of newly created SMEs in the Brazilian manufacturing industry: an econometric study. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3735, 2016.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoper, S. & Dundas, N. Grant Assistance and Small Firm Development in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(1), 99-117, 2001.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaemundsson, R.& Dahlstrand, A How business opportunities constrain young technology-based rms from growing into medium-sized rms. Small Business Economics, 24, 113{129, 2005.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSantarelli, E. The duration of new rms in banking: an application of Cox regression analysis. Empirical Economics 25:315-325, 2000.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSarder, J., Ghosh, D., & Rosa, P. The Importance of Support Services to Small Enterprises in Bangladesh. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(2), 26-36, 1997.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaunila, M., Ukko, J., Rantala, T., Nasiri, M. & Hannu R. Preceding operational capabilities as antecedents for productivity and innovation performance. Journal of Business Economics (2020) 90:537-561, 2019.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaunila, M. Innovation capability in achieving higher performance: perspectives of management and employees. Journal Technology Analysis Strategic Management, Volume 29, pages 903-916, 2017.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSwann, G. The Economics of Innovation: An Introduction. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar, 2009.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTan, H. & Lopez-Acevedo, G. Evaluating Training Programs for Small and Medium Enterprises: Lessons from Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3760, Washington D.C., 2005.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTan, H. & Lopez-Acevedo, G. How Well Do Small and Medium Enterprise Programs Work? Evaluating Mexico's SME Programs Using Panel Firm Data. World Bank Institute and Latin America and Caribbean Region, 2006.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTan, H. & Lopez-Acevedo, G. Impact Evaluation of SME Programs in LAC. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank., 2010.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUnger, J., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta - analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341{358, 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWalters, S. What is a Cox model?. University of Sheffield, 2009.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWren, C. & Storey, D. Evaluating the E ects of Soft Business Support Upon Small Firm Per- formance. Oxford Economic Papers, 54(2), 334-365, 2002.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectAlianzas para la Innovaciónspa
dc.subjectProgramas de Innovaciónspa
dc.subjectInnovaciónspa
dc.subjectSupervivencia empresarialspa
dc.subjectGeneración de empleospa
dc.subjectCapacidades humanasspa
dc.subjectEvaluación de Impactospa
dc.subject.ddcAdministración públicaspa
dc.subject.ddcProblemas & servicios de bienestar socialspa
dc.subject.keywordInnovationspa
dc.subject.keywordAlianzas para la Innovaciónspa
dc.subject.keywordHuman capabilitiesspa
dc.subject.keywordImapct Evaluationspa
dc.subject.keywordInnovation programspa
dc.subject.keywordFirm survivalspa
dc.titleInnovación, supervivencia y generación de empleo: evidencia para Colombiaspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleInnovation, firm survival and employment: Evidence for Colombiaeng
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.documentArtículospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTesis de maestríaspa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
OrtizMedina-MonicaLorena-2020.pdf
Tamaño:
1.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento principal
Descargar
Colecciones
Maestría en Economía de las Políticas Públicas