Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Las interacciones organizacionales desde la visión ecológica: la competencia

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorNoguera Hidalgo, Ángela Lucía
dc.creatorRiveros Ardila, Astrid Carolina
dc.creator.degreeAdministrador de Negocios Internacionales
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T16:09:38Z
dc.date.available2013-12-04T16:09:38Z
dc.date.created2013-08-28
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionComo parte del trabajo de doctorado de la Señora Ángela Lucia Noguera Hidalgo, el presente documento reúne un compilado de las diversas fuentes relacionadas con el concepto biológico de la “competencia” y su relación con las organizaciones. Es un trabajo en donde a partir de las investigaciones ya existentes se realiza un resumen concienzudo sobre el tema, logrando de este modo un estado del arte.spa
dc.description.abstractAs part of the PhD degree work of Ángela Lucia Noguera Hidalgo, this paper collects a compilation of several sources related to the biological concept of “competition” and its relation to the enterprises. It is a work where 24 articles realated to this approach are summarized.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_4809
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/4809
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de administraciónspa
dc.publisher.programAdministrador de negocios internacionalesspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto completo)spa
dc.rights.ccAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARÁGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAndrevski, G., & Ferrier, W. (2008). Toward an “Austrian” theory of sustainable competitive advantage: The role of value-enhancing actions. Presented at the Competitive Dynamics Research Workshop 2008 (Helsinki, Finland).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBarnett, W. P. (1997). The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 128-160.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBarnett, W. P. & McKendrick, D. G. (2004) Why are some organizations more competitive than others? evidence from a changing global market. Administrative science quarterly., 49 (4). 535-571
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeck, N. (2008). Organizational ecology as a theory of competition. The institutions of the market: organizations, social systems, and governance, 202.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBergen, M.E. & Peteraf, M.A.(2002). Competitor identification and competitor analysis: a broad-based managerial approach. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 157–169.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBettis, R.A. & Hitt, M.A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 16, 7–20.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBogner, W.C. & Barr, P.S. (2000). Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science, 11, 212–226.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChen, M.-J. & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive Dynamics: Themes, Trends, and a Prospective Research Platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Aveni R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Aveni, R, Battista, G. & Smith, K.G. (2010).The Age of Temporary Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (13), 1371-1385.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDerfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 61– 80.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFerrier, W.J., MacFhionnlaoich, C., Smith, K.G. & Grimm, C.M. (2002). The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of competing views. Managerial & Decision Economics 23,301–316.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGrant, R. M. The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review 33(3), 114-135.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGrimm, C.M., Lee, H. & Smith, K.G. (2005). Strategy as Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage. Oxford U.K.: Oxford University Press.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHan, Y. (2007). Population ecology, strategic choice and competition. International Journal of Business Research, VII(4), 124-128.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNúñez-Nickel, M., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2006). New size measurements in population ecology. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 61-81.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPorter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPorter, M.E. (1987) From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy, Harvard Business Review, May/June 1987, 43–59.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPorter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 61–78.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReydon, T. A., & Scholz, M. (2009). Why organizational ecology is not a darwinian research program. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(3), 408-439.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRindova, V., Ferrier, W. & Wiltbank, R. (2010). Value from gestalt: how sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets. Strategic Management Journal 31(13), 1474–1497.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSalimath, M. S., & Jones III, R. (2011). Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability. Management Decision, 49(6), 874-910.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSengupta, J.K. (2002). Model of Hypercompetition. International Journal of Systems Science, 33 (8), 669-675.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Arregle, J.L. & Campbell, J.T. (2010). The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1386–1409.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTisdell, C. A. (2001). Competition, Evolution and Optimisation: Comparisons of Models in Economics and Ecology (No. 48384). University of Queensland, School of Economics.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThomas, L.G, III. (1996). The Two Faces of Competition: Dynamic Resourcefulness and the Hypercompetitive Shift. Organization Science, 7(3), 221-242.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThompson, J.D. (1957). Organization in Action. New York: McGraw-hill
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWiggins R y Ruefli TW.(2005). Schumpeter’s Ghost: Is Hypercompetition Making The Best of Times Shorter?. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887-911.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWu, M. (2012). Managing Stakeholders: An Integrative Perspective on the Source of Competitive Advantage. Asian Social Science, 8 (10), 160-172.
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectCompetenciaspa
dc.subjectVentaja competitivaspa
dc.subjectIncertidumbrespa
dc.subjectEcologíaspa
dc.subject.keywordCompetitioneng
dc.subject.keywordCompetitive advantageeng
dc.subject.keywordUncertaintyeng
dc.subject.keywordEcologyeng
dc.subject.lembAdministración de empresasspa
dc.subject.lembAdministración industrialspa
dc.subject.lembCambio organizacionalspa
dc.subject.lembCompetencia industrialspa
dc.subject.lembCompetitividadspa
dc.subject.lembGestion industrialspa
dc.subject.lembLiderazgospa
dc.subject.lembPlanificación empresarialspa
dc.subject.lembPlanificación estratégicaspa
dc.titleLas interacciones organizacionales desde la visión ecológica: la competenciaspa
dc.typebachelorThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RiverosArdila-AstridCarolina-2013.pdf
Tamaño:
905.01 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Pregrado en Administración de Negocios Internacionales