Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Viabilidad miocárdica en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica a través de resonancia magnética cardiaca

dc.contributor.advisorLugo Peña, Julián Rodrigo
dc.contributor.advisorCampo Bautista, Esther María
dc.creatorZuluaga Monroy, Juan David
dc.creatorBarragán Amado, Andrés Felipe
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Cardiología
dc.creator.degreeLevelMaestría
dc.creator.degreetypeFull time
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T16:18:55Z
dc.date.available2024-03-01T16:18:55Z
dc.date.created2023-05-25
dc.descriptionLa cardiopatía isquémica es una condición patológica caracterizada por la reducción del flujo sanguíneo que causa un desequilibrio entre la suplencia y la demanda de oxígeno. El concepto de “viabilidad miocárdica” surge de la observación de desdiferenciación celular con pérdida de las proteínas contráctiles pero sin muerte celular (sin necrosis), el cual es un estado protector con una baja tasa metabólica como respuesta a la poca oferta de oxígeno y nutrientes. Se ha observado que al restablecer el flujo a estos territorios coronarios, hay recuperación de la función contráctil, parcial o completamente. Esta recuperación del miocardio viable ha despertado el interés ya que podría llevar a una mejoría en la función cardiaca y así, a una mejoría en sobrevida. Las imágenes de viabilidad tienen una significancia clínica importante para la identificación de este miocardio que tiene un potencial para la restauración de la función. Publicaciones recientes han demostrado la precisión de la resonancia magnética cardíaca con realce con Gadolinium en la evaluación de la viabilidad miocárdica; sin embargo, no se ha demostrado el beneficio en supervivencia de la revascularización guiada por la viabilidad miocárdica, por lo que se llevó a cabo este estudio. Encontramos que la incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares mayores fue menor en el grupo de intervención, sin mejoría significativa en la angina, clase funcional ni en la FEVI. Sin embargo, la presencia o no de viabilidad miocárdica no modificó la incidencia de desenlaces cardiovasculares ni el comportamiento de la función sistólica.
dc.description.abstractIschemic heart disease is a pathological condition characterized by reduced blood flow that causes an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand. The concept of "myocardial viability" arises from the observation of cell dedifferentiation with loss of contractile proteins but without cell death (without necrosis), which is a protective state with a low metabolic rate in response to the low supply of oxygen and nutrients. It has been observed that by restoring the flow to these coronary territories, there is recovery of the contractile function, partially or completely. This recovery of viable myocardium has aroused interest as it could lead to improved cardiac function and thus improved survival. Viability imaging has important clinical significance for the identification of this myocardium that has potential for restoration of function. Recent publications have demonstrated the accuracy of Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MRI in assessing myocardial viability; however, the survival benefit of myocardial viability-guided revascularization has not been demonstrated, which is why we carried out this study. We found that the incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower in the intervention group, with no significant improvement in angina, functional class, or LVEF. However, the presence or absence of myocardial viability did not modify the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes or the behavior of systolic function.
dc.format.extent87 pp
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_42309
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42309
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Cardiología
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFelker GM, Shaw LK, O’Connor CM. A standardized definition of ischemic cardiomyopathy for use in clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jan;39(2):210–8.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFord TJ, Corcoran D, Berry C. Stable coronary syndromes: Pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need. Vol. 104, Heart. BMJ Publishing Group; 2018. p. 284–92.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKhan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa H, Baniyas MY, al Suwaidi SKBM, AlKatheeri R, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020 Jul 23;
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmeida AG, Carpenter JP, Cameli M, Donal E, Dweck MR, Flachskampf FA, et al. Multimodality imaging of myocardial viability: An expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug 1;22(8):E97–125.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGabaldon-Perez A, Marcos-Garces V, Gavara J, Rios-Navarro C, Miñana G, Bayes-Genis A, et al. Coronary revascularization and long-term survivorship in chronic coronary syndrome. Vol. 10, Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI; 2021. p. 1–19.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShah BN, Khattar RS, Senior R. The hibernating myocardium: Current concepts, diagnostic dilemmas, and clinical challenges in the post-STICH era. Vol. 34, European Heart Journal. 2013. p. 1323–36.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCurtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Ko DT, Jadbabaie F, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):736–42.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Vol. 42, European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 3599–726.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMaron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O’Brien SM, Boden WE, et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395–407.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, Holly TA, Binkley PF, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1617–25.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, et al. The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Reversible Myocardial Dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2000 Nov 16;343(20):1445–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200011163432003
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRomero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W, Garcia MJ. CMR Imaging Assessing Viability in Patients With Chronic Ventricular Dysfunction Due to Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2012;5(5):494–508. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X12002756
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMc Ardle B, Shukla T, Nichol G, Dekemp RA, Bernick J, Guo A, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Outcomes with F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Coronary Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep 1;9(9).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationde Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991–1001.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSelvanayagam JB, Kardos A, Francis JM, Wiesmann F, Petersen SE, Taggart DP, et al. Value of Delayed-Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Myocardial Viability After Surgical Revascularization. Circulation. 2004 Sep 21;110(12):1535–41.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPegg TJ, Selvanayagam JB, Jennifer J, Francis JM, Karamitsos TD, Dall’Armellina E, et al. Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2010 Dec 7;12(1):56.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGerber BL, Darchis J, le Polain de Waroux JB, Legros G, Pouleur AC, Vancraeynest D, et al. Relationship Between Transmural Extent of Necrosis and Quantitative Recovery of Regional Strains After Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jul;3(7):720–30.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChoi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Improvement in Contractile Function. Circulation. 2001 Sep 4;104(10):1101–7.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChen Z, Sohal M, Sammut E, Child N, Jackson T, Claridge S, et al. Focal But Not Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Burden Quantification Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Left Ventricular Reverse Modeling Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):203–9.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLöffler AI, Kramer CM. Myocardial Viability Testing to Guide Coronary Revascularization. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2018 Jul;7(3):355–65.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNeumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Vol. 40, European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 87–165.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG. Hibernating Myocardium. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998 Jul 16;339(3):173–81.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJensen RV, Hjortbak MV, Bøtker HE. Ischemic Heart Disease: An Update. Semin Nucl Med. 2020 May;50(3):195–207.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012 Dec;380(9859):2095–128.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVirani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2021 Update. Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKolwicz SC, Purohit S, Tian R. Cardiac Metabolism and its Interactions With Contraction, Growth, and Survival of Cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2013 Aug 16;113(5):603–16.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSlart RHJA, Bax JJ, van der Wall EE, van Veldhuisen DJ, Jager PL, Dierckx RA. Nuclear cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability. Neth Heart J. 2005 Nov;13(11):408–15.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDilsizian V, Rocco TP, Freedman NMT, Leon MB, Bonow RO. Enhanced Detection of Ischemic but Viable Myocardium by the Reinjection of Thallium after Stress-Redistribution Imaging. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990 Jul 19;323(3):141–6.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2020 Dec 12;22(1):19.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeanlands RSB, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, et al. F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Suspected Coronary Disease. A Randomized, Controlled Trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 13;50(20):2002–12.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, et al. Relationship of MRI Delayed Contrast Enhancement to Irreversible Injury, Infarct Age, and Contractile Function. Circulation. 1999 Nov 9;100(19):1992–2002.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Boersma E, Rahimtoola SH. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of various noninvasive techniques for detecting hibernating myocardium. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2001 Feb;26(2):147–81.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcDiarmid AK, Pellicori P, Cleland JG, Plein S. Taxonomy of segmental myocardial systolic dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 2016 May 4;ehw140.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGunning MG, Kaprielian RR, Pepper J, Pennell DJ, Sheppard MN, Severs NJ, et al. The histology of viable and hibernating myocardium in relation to imaging characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb;39(3):428–35.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLarose E, Rodés-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Rinfret S, Proulx G, Nguyen CM, et al. Predicting Late Myocardial Recovery and Outcomes in the Early Hours of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun;55(22):2459–69.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGerber BL, Rousseau MF, Ahn SA, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Phlips T, et al. Prognostic Value of Myocardial Viability by Delayed-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Low Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb;59(9):825–35.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarcia MJ, Kwong RY, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Taub CC, Blankstein R, Lima J, et al. State of the Art: Imaging for Myocardial Viability: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul 1;13(7).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPanza JA, Chrzanowski L, Bonow RO. Myocardial Viability Assessment Before Surgical Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(10):1068–77.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBozkurt B, Coats AJ, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid M, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, et al. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2021 Apr;27(4):387–413.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289–367.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIbanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119–77.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAd N, Holmes SD, Patel J, Pritchard G, Shuman DJ, Halpin L. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, Original EuroSCORE, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score in Cardiac Surgery Patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):573–9.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKwon DH, Obuchowski NA, Marwick TH, Menon V, Griffin B, Flamm SD, et al. Jeopardized Myocardium Defined by Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Survival in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Impact of Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(22).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKwon DH, Hachamovitch R, Popovic ZB, Starling RC, Desai MY, Flamm SD, et al. Survival in Patients With Severe Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Revascularization Versus Medical Therapy. Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11_suppl_1).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOrlandini A, Castellana N, Pascual A, Botto F, Cecilia Bahit M, Chacon C, et al. Myocardial viability for decision-making concerning revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of non-randomized and randomized studies. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar;182:494–9.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBeanlands RSB, Ruddy TD, deKemp RA, Iwanochko RM, Coates G, Freeman M, et al. Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov;40(10):1735–43.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVelazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, Jain A, Sopko G, Marchenko A, et al. Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1607–16.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVelazquez EJ, Lee KL, Jones RH, Al-Khalidi HR, Hill JA, Panza JA, et al. Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1511–20.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbraham A, Nichol G, Williams KA, Guo A, deKemp RA, Garrard L, et al. 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Myocardial Viability in an Experienced Center with Access to 18F-FDG and Integration with Clinical Management Teams: The Ottawa-FIVE Substudy of the PARR 2 Trial. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2010 Apr;51(4):567–74.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShah DJ, Kim HW, James O, Parker M, Wu E, Bonow RO, et al. Prevalence of Regional Myocardial Thinning and Relationship With Myocardial Scarring in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA. 2013 Mar 6;309(9):909.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539–42.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchoenfeld DA. Sample-Size Formula for the Proportional-Hazards Regression Model. Biometrics. 1983 Jun;39(2):499.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHernández CE, Carpio N. Introducción a los tipos de muestreo. ALERTA Revista Científica del Instituto Nacional de Salud. 2019 Mar 13;2(1):75–9.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarsaglia G, Tsang WW, Wang J. Evaluating Kolmogorov’s Distribution. J Stat Softw. 2003;8(18).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcHugh ML. The Chi-square test of independence. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;143–9.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPaul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):67–80.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWilliams JR. Revising the declaration of Helsinki. World Med J. 2008;54(4):120–2.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMinisterio de Salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993 [Internet]. Colombia; 1993 [cited 2022 Apr 15]. p. 1–19. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKwon DH, Halley CM, Carrigan TP, Zysek V, Popovic ZB, Setser R, et al. Extent of Left Ventricular Scar Predicts Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients With Significantly Reduced Systolic Function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan;2(1):34–44.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPerera D, Clayton T, O’Kane PD, Greenwood JP, Weerackody R, Ryan M, et al. Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1351–60.
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectViabilidad miocárdica
dc.subjectResonancia cardiaca
dc.subjectDisfunción ventricular
dc.subjectArteriografía coronaria
dc.subjectRevascularización miocárdica
dc.subjectCardiomiopatía isquémica
dc.subject.keywordMyocardial viability
dc.subject.keywordCardiac resonance
dc.subject.keywordLeft ventricular dysfunction
dc.subject.keywordMyocardial Revascularization
dc.subject.keywordCoronary Artery Arteriography
dc.subject.keywordIschemic Cardiomyopathy
dc.titleViabilidad miocárdica en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica a través de resonancia magnética cardiaca
dc.title.TranslatedTitleMyocardial viability in patients with ischemic heart disease by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
dc.typearticle
dc.type.documentTrabajo de grado
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículo
local.department.reportEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Viabilidad_miocardica_en_pacientes_con_cardiopatía_isquemica.pdf
Tamaño:
1.7 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: