Ítem
Solo Metadatos

There is No Pill for Deliberation: Explaining Discourse Quality in Post?conflict Communities

dc.creatorUgarriza Uribe, Juan Estebanspa
dc.creatorNussio, Enzospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T16:20:24Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T16:20:24Z
dc.date.created2016-03spa
dc.description.abstractRecent experimental research suggests that ordinary citizens are capable of behaving in a democratic and deliberative way in controversial political debates, when given the right instructions. In this study, we test the potential of such instructions in contexts where levels of polarization, conflict and social marginalization are high. Using a randomized controlled experimental design, we test the effect of encouraging members of marginalized and conflictaffected communities in Colombia to live up to the deliberative ideal, including free participation, mutual respect, justification of arguments, and contributing to the common good. Results indicate that deliberative instructions have a positive effect on intervention levels, but fail to increase discourse quality. We also find that socio-economic differences (especially education and gender), as well as inter-group trust dynamics, explain much of the variation in discourse quality. Promoting deliberative democracy under unfavorable conditions might therefore require a combination of short-term policy measures aimed at increasing communal trust, long-term efforts to improve schooling levels, and ensuring constraint-free participation. There is, however, no treatment yet that can ensure deliberation successeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12195
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 1424-7755
dc.identifier.issnEISSN: 1662-6370
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/25990
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage166
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage145
dc.relation.citationTitleSwiss Political Science Review
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 22
dc.relation.ispartofSwiss Political Science Review, ISSN: 1424-7755 ; EISSN: 1662-6370, Vol.22, No.1 (2016-03); pp.145-166spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/spsr.12195spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.sourceSwiss Political Science Reviewspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keywordPolitical Sciencespa
dc.subject.keywordStudies in Human Societyspa
dc.titleThere is No Pill for Deliberation: Explaining Discourse Quality in Post?conflict Communitiesspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleNo hay píldora para la deliberación: explicando la calidad del discurso en las comunidades que salen de un conflictospa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones