Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Caracterización clínica y endoscópica de los pacientes llevados a Colonoscopia en el Hospital Universitario Samaritana 2017-2018

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorRey, Mario Humberto
dc.contributor.advisorPedraza Flechas, Ana María
dc.creatorGomez Rodríguez, Andrea
dc.creatorMarrugo Padilla, Katherine Tatiana
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Gastroenterologíaspa
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-02T22:48:20Z
dc.date.available2020-03-02T22:48:20Z
dc.date.created2020-01-07
dc.descriptionIntroducción : En Colombia el cancer colorectal es la cuarta causa de muerte por cancer. La colonoscopia es una estrategia de tamizaje que puede prevenir el desarrollo de lesiones precancerosas. Es importante caracterizar clínica y endoscópicamente la población que es llevada a colonoscopia en nuestro medio, así como el rendimiento y el cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad de este procedimiento. Objetivo: Caracterizar clínica y endoscópicamente la población de pacientes a quienes se les practicó colonoscopia en el HUS de junio 2017 hasta junio 2018. Materiales y metodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo de pacientes llevados a colonoscopia en el HUS entre Junio 2017 hasta Junio 2018. Resultados : Se incluyeron 554 colonoscopias. La distribución entre hombres y mujeres fue similar y su media de edad fue de 57 años. El 81% de las colonoscopias tenían adecuada preparación. En el 90% de las colonoscopias se logró visualizar el ciego. La tasa de detección de adenomas fue del 8,7%. El tiempo de retirada fue igual o mayor a 6 minutos en el 90% de los casos. La prevalencia de tumores colorrectales en la muestra fue del 6,3%. Conclusiones : La proporción de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad de acuerdo con los estándares nacionales fue buena para firma de consentimiento informado y porcentaje de las colonoscopias en las que se visualizó el ciego. La tasa de detección de adenomas fue baja y la prevalencia de tumores colorectales es más baja que la reportada en Colombia.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In Colombia the colorectal cancer is the fourth cause of death from cancer. The colonoscopy is a strategy for screening that helps to prevent pre-cancerous lesions. It is important to characterize clinically and endoscopically in our environment the success of this procedure. Objective: Characterize clinically and endoscopically all HUS patients who have received a colonoscopy from June 2017 to June 2018. Materials and Methods: Observational descriptive study of HUS patients which got a colonoscopy procedure at HUS from June 2017 to June 2018. Results: The results include a total of 554 colonoscopies. The gender distribution was similar between men and women and the age average was 57 years. In the 90% of the colonoscopies the Boston scale was reported to be achieved. In the 90% of the colonoscopies the cecum was visualized. The adenomas detection rate was 8,7%. The time needed to remove them was equal or greater 6 minutes in the 90% of the cases. The colorectal tumor rate was 6,3%. Conclusions: The proportion of success of the quality indicators with respect to the national standard was good on the order of frequency with which informed consent was obtained and fully documented and the percentage of the colonoscopies that the cecum was visualized. The adenomas and colorectal tumors rate detection rate was lower compare to Colombia national rate.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_20967
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20967
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Gastroenterologíaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation1. Allen J, Sc B, Palomino JC, D P, Marez T De, Heeswijk RPG Van, et al. New England Journal. Tuberculosis. 2009;2397–405.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2. Gil Parada FL, Torres Amaya M, Riveros Santoya SV, Castaño Llano R, Ibáñez H, Huertas Quintero MM, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the screening of colorectal cancer-2015. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2015; 30:67–74.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation3. Cecal intubation . Available from: http://www.hus.org.co/index.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation4. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2006;63(4, Supplement):S16–28. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510706002847spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation5. Prevención D, De La T. Guía De Práctica Clínica Gpc. 2017;(20):1–36. Available from: http://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/234GER.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation6. Hilsden RJ, Dube C, Heitman SJ, Bridges R, McGregor SE, Rostom A. The association of colonoscopy quality indicators with the detection of screen-relevant lesions, adverse events, and postcolonoscopy cancers in an asymptomatic Canadian colorectal cancer screening population. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. Elsevier, Inc.; 2015;82(5):887–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1914spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation7. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, et al. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2014;370(14):1298–306. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1309086spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation8. Lee JK, Corley DA. What makes a “good” colonoscopy quality indicator? Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(1):179–81.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation9. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, et al. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2010;362(19):1795–803. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa0907667spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation10. Lim D, Muthineni S, Vennalaganti P, Gupta N, Parasa S, Titi MA, et al. Mo1092 Reporting Quality Indicators During Colonoscopy: How Do U.S. Gastroenterologists Fare? - Results From a National Survey. Gastroenterology [Internet]. AGA Institute; 2015;148(4):S-603. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016508515320370spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation11. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, et al. A Predictive Model Identifies Patients Most Likely to Have Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2012;10(5):501–6. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154235651200016Xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation12. Bersani G, Rossi A, Ricci G, Pollino V, DeFabritiis G, Suzzi A, et al. Do ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy enhance the probability of finding relevant pathologies in an open access service? Dig Liver Dis [Internet]. 2005;37(8):609–14. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1590865805001453spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation13. Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2012;75(6):1127–31. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510712000338spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation14. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):72–90.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation15. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2012;143(3):844–57. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016508512008128spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation16. Friedman S, Rubin PH, Bodian C, Goldstein E, Harpaz N, Present DH. Screening and surveillance colonoscopy in chronic Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2001;120(4):820–6. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001650850104241Xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation17. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2010;72(4):686–92. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510710018638spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation18. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J-J, Burnand B, Vader J-P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2005;61(3):378–84. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510704027762spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation19. Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Rabeneck L. Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2011;140(1):65–72. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016508510013223spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation20. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a Time-Dependent Colonoscopic Withdrawal Protocol on Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2008;6(10):1091–8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356508003510spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation21. Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2004;60(3):414–8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510704018085spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation22. American Institute for Cancer Research.https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/comparing-more-and-less-developed-countriesspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation23. Globocan 2018. https://gco.iarc.fr/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation24- Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):72–90spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation25. Fabio Leonel Gil FL, Torres M, Riveros S, Castaño R, Ibáñez H, Huertas MM, Carmona R, Pardo R, Otero W, Sabbagh L, Guía de práctica clínica para la tamización del cáncer colorrectal – 2015. Guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia. Rev Col Gastroenterol / 30 Supl 1 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation26. Biecker E, Floer M,Heinecke A, Stro¨bel P, Bo¨hme R, Schepke M, Meister T. Novel Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Increases the Polyp Detection Rate. A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Gastroenterol Volume 49, Number 5, May/June 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation27. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, Boer Jd, Bruce H. Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298-306. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1309086spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation28 Shaukat A, Rector T, Church T, et al. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2015;149:952–957spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation29 Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CM, Dekker E, et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut 2015;64:1257–1267.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation30. Ai X, Qiao W, Han Z, Tan W, Bai Y, Liu S, Zhi F. Results of a second examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;30(2):181-186. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation31 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation32 Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino V, Della Valle N, Cosimo M, Muscatiello N. Full-spectrum versus standard colonoscopy for improving polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. 2017spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation33. Ness R.M et al., Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The american journal of gastroenterology Vol. 96, No. 6, 2001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation34. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:1296–1308.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation35. Mahmood S., Farooqui SM., Madhoun M F. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2018, 00:000–000. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001175spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation36. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Vol 61, No. 3: 2005spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation37 Bakera FA, Marib A, Nafrina S, Sukia M, Ovadiaa B, Gala O, Kopelamna Y. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Annals of Gastroenterology (2019) 32, 457-462spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation38. Bick, B. L., Vemulapalli, K. C., & Rex, D. K. (2016). Regional center for complex colonoscopy: yield of neoplasia in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 83(6), 1239–1244. Consultar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.053spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation39. Rabeneck L, Souchek J, El-Serag HB. Survival of colorectal cancer patients hospitalized in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Am J. Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1186–1192spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation40. Hoff Geir et al. Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy. Endoscopy International Open 2017; 05: E489–E495spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation41. 39. Martin Lund, Rune Erichsen, Sisse Helle Njor, Søren Laurberg, Roland Valori & Berit Andersenand on behalf of the Central Denmark Region's ‘Quality of Colonoscopies’ group (2019): The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FITbased colorectal cancer screening program, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, DOI:10.1080/00365521.2019.1648548spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation42 Belderbos Tim DG et al. Comparison between hospitals provides incentives for quality improvement in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 703–709spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation43. Vavricka Stephan R et al. Colonoscopy withdrawal time monitoring… Endoscopy 2016; 48: 256–262spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation44. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. NEJM 2006; 355: 2533–2541spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation45. Overholt BF, Brooks-Belli L, Grace M et al. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: e80–e86spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation46. Lee TJW, Blanks RG, Rees CJ et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012; 61: 1050–1057spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation47 Vavricka Stephan R et al. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists Endoscopy 2016; 48: 256–262spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation48 S.M. Campo-Sáncheza, J. Camargo-Trillosa, J.A. Calle-Ramíreza. Supervivencia de cáncer colorrectal en un centrooncológico de Colombia. Estudio de cohorte histórica. Revista de Gastroenterologia de Mexico. 2018spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation49 Mabel Bohorquez, MDa,b, Ruta Sahasrabudhe, PhDa, Angel Criollo, MSca.Clinical manifestations of colorectal cancer patients from a large multicenter study in Colombia. Article in Medicina. October 2016spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectColonoscopíaspa
dc.subjectPóliposspa
dc.subjectEscalas de Preparaciónspa
dc.subjectDetección de Adenomasspa
dc.subject.ddcIncidencia & prevención de la enfermedadspa
dc.subject.lembGastroenterología - investigacionesspa
dc.subject.lembEndoscopia gastrointestinal – Análisis de resultadosspa
dc.subject.lembCondiciones precancerosas – Prevenciónspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades funcionales del colon – Diagnóstico por imágenesspa
dc.titleCaracterización clínica y endoscópica de los pacientes llevados a Colonoscopia en el Hospital Universitario Samaritana 2017-2018spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleClinical and endoscopic characterization of patients taken to Colonoscopy at the Samaritana University Hospital 2017-2018eng
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.documentTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
tesis de grado PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
380.29 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.44 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Especialización en Gastroenterología