Ítem
Solo Metadatos

The application of the principle of complementarity to the decision of where to open an investigation: the admissibility of ‘situations’

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorOlasolo Alonso, Hector
dc.creatorCarnero-Rojo, Enriquespa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T15:49:13Z
dc.date.available2020-08-28T15:49:13Z
dc.date.created2011spa
dc.description.abstractSome authors have expressed the view that ‘the complementarity test under Article 17 of the ICC Statute applies where the investigation into a given country or conflict situation has yielded a case’. Nevertheless, Article 53(1)(b) of the ICC Statute and Rule 48 of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence appear to request the application of the complementarity test at a much earlier stage of the proceedings. As a result, the question arises as to what is the object of such an admissibility assessment, considering the early stage of the proceedings at which it must be carried out, as well as the fact that a case only arises at a significantly subsequent stage of the proceedings. This chapter intends to shed some light on this issue. It first analyses how the ICC Pre-trial, Trial and Appeals Chambers have interpreted so far the distinction between the notions of ‘situation’ and ‘case’ provided for in the ICC Statute. It then turns its attention to the notion of ‘admissibility of situations’ (as opposed to ‘admissibility of cases’). It analyses its content, relevance and, most importantly, whether there is any room for such a notion under the current statutory scheme, as interpreted in the ICC case law so far. Finally, the last section of the chapter advances some guiding criteria for the performance of admissibility assessments of situations.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316134115.022
dc.identifier.issnEISBN: 9781316134115
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28487
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage420
dc.relation.citationStartPage393
dc.relation.citationTitleThe International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice
dc.relation.ispartofThe International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, EISBN: 9781316134115 (2011); pp. 393-420spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-criminal-court-and-complementarity/application-of-the-principle-of-complementarity-to-the-decision-of-where-to-open-an-investigation/9D346EFCFA1426BFE8C89251A6A12214spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.accesoRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)spa
dc.sourceThe International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practicespa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keywordPublic international lawspa
dc.subject.keywordLawspa
dc.subject.keywordCriminal lawspa
dc.titleThe application of the principle of complementarity to the decision of where to open an investigation: the admissibility of ‘situations’spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleLa aplicación del principio de complementariedad a la decisión de dónde abrir una investigación: la admisibilidad de "situaciones"spa
dc.typebookParteng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaParte de librospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Libros