Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Calidad de vida, resultados y complicaciones en pacientes intervenidas de colpopexia con malla. Hospital Universitario Mayor 2015– 2018

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorGómez Polanía, Omar Leonardo
dc.contributor.advisorBuitrago Medina, Daniel Alejandro
dc.creatorMoncada Garzón, Jullieth Stephanny
dc.creatorMuñoz Escandón, Juan Camilo
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Ginecología y Obstericiaspa
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T16:02:36Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29T16:02:36Z
dc.date.created2018-12-05
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionEl prolapso del piso pélvico es una entidad que se presenta en por lo menos el 40% al 60% de las mujeres durante toda su vida. Su manejo actualmente ha venido evolucionando, desde el uso de tejido autólogo para la reparación del prolapso hasta la aplicación de materiales protésicos entre los que se destacan las mallas de polipropileno, cuyo uso está avalado por la Food and Drug Administration - FDA. A nivel mundial, se han realizado diferentes estudios en pacientes con prolapso del piso pélvico y en las que se han utilizado las mallas para la corrección y los resultados obtenidos de las evaluaciones señalan la ocurrencia de desenlaces, entre los que se destacan la recurrencia de la enfermedad, la exposición de la malla y, las infecciones vaginales, entre otros. En la literatura actual no se dispone de datos en Colombia sobre este asunto y han sido muy pocos los estudios que se han realizado en Latinoamérica. Con el presente proyecto de investigación se proponen evaluar los resultados del seguimiento, en el transcurso del tiempo hasta un año de postoperatorio, de las pacientes que han sido intervenidas quirúrgicamente en el Hospital Universitario Mayor, objeto del manejo con mallas. De igual manera, se pretenden evaluar los impactos en diferentes aspectos relacionados con la calidad de vida de cada una de las pacientes involucradas en la investigación, para lo cual se implementará una encuesta a través de la cual se interroga a las pacientes sobre la incontinencia urinaria y de su efecto sobre el estilo de vida.spa
dc.description.abstractThe prolapse of the pelvic floor is an entity that occurs in at least 40% to 60% of women throughout their lives. Currently handling has evolved from the use of autologous tissue to prolapse repair to the application of prosthetic materials including stand polypropylene meshes whose use is supported by the Food and Drug Administration - FDA. Globally, there have been various studies in patients with pelvic floor prolapse in which there has been a use of mesh for the correction. The results of the evaluations indicate the occurrence of outcomes, including highlights recurrence disease, exposure of the mesh and vaginal infections, among others. In the current literature there is no data available in Colombia about this subject and there have been very few studies conducted in Latin America. The purpose of this project is to show the impact of surgery on quality of life in the patients who underwent vaginal mesh colpopexy surgery at the University Hospital Mayor - Mederi. Similarly, it is intended to assess urinary incontinence by using a survey.spa
dc.description.embargo2020-02-21 01:01:01: Script de automatizacion de embargos. info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2020-02-20spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18953
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18953
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstericiaspa
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaessler K, Christmann‐Schmid C, Maher C, Haya N, Crawford TJ, Brown J. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(8).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHorst W, do Valle JB, Silva JC, Gascho CLL. Pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2016spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBarber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783–90spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD, Gynecology A. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369:1027–38.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHagen S, Thakar R. Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2012;22(5):118–22.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRogo-Gupta L, Rodriguez L V, Litwin MS, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Lu Y-S, et al. Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1105–15spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGaines N, Gupta P, Sirls LT. Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh. 2016;1–9spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWise J. Permanent mesh has “ limited utility ” for vaginal prolapse repair , review finds. 2016;822(February):1–3.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRichter LA. P e l vic O rgan Pro l ap s e — Vag i n a l an d L a p a ro s c o p i c M e s h : The Evidence Pelvic organ prolapse Mesh Sacrocolpopexy Laparoscopy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Clin NA [Internet]. 2016;43(1):83–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation- PA-LC, S, , AAD KHOURY - ALAN WEIN than I. Epstein DJG. Incontinence. EAU european assosiacion of urology. 2013. 1377-1442 p.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1459–64.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFDA. Food and Drug Administration. FDA safety communication: Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh : Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Rev Lit Arts Am. 2011;(July):Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medical.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConstantini, E, Lazzeri M. What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today ? PubMed Commons. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(4):300–4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBacsu C, Zimmern P. Complicaciones del tratamiento de incontinencia urinaria y prolapso de la pelvis. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes [Internet]. 2013;24(2):238–47. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S071686401370155Xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSun Y, Tang C, Luo D, Yang L, Shen H. The treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapsed by repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(2):155–67.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMaldonado PA. P e l v i c O r g a n P ro l a p s e New Concepts in Pelvic Floor Anatomy Prolapse Anatomy Pelvic floor Compartments Concepts Theories. Obstet Gynecol Clin NA [Internet]. 2016;43(1):15–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationReid F. Pelvic organ prolapse : anatomical and functional assessment. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med [Internet]. 2017;27(2):57–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2017.01.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRafael Luna Méndez T, Astudillo Dávalos FE. Uroginecología y cirugía reconstructiva de la pelvis: -.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDoaee M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nourmohammadi A, Razavi-Ratk SK, Nojomi M. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25(2):153–63.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSun X, Zhang X, Wang J. Surgical outcomes and quality of life post-synthetic mesh-augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(2):509–14.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoovers3 CRK& MMEL& AT de K& JPWR. Effects of mesh-related complications in vaginal surgery on quality of life. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuiz de Viñaspre Hernandez R, Tomás Aznar C, Rubio Aranda E. Validación de la versión española de las formas cortas del Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) y del Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) en mujeres embarazadas. Gac Sanit. 2011;25(5):379–84.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationElaine Utomo, Ida J. Korfage, Mark F. Wildhagen, Anneke B. Steensma, Chris H. Bangma BFMB. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch Population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(3):224–30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCorcos J, Behlouli H, Beaulieu S. Identifying cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):198–203.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMs AG, Hartmann KE, Hellwege JN, Velez DR, Ms E, Ms TLE. Systematic Review Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse : a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.039spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGoulart F, Dias F, Henrique P, Fernandes G, Prudente A, Riccetto C. New strategies to improve results of mesh surgeries for vaginal prolapses repair – an update _______________________________________________. 2015;41(4):623–34spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBalci BK, Ugurlucan FG, Yasa C, Yalcin O. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of occult urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017;210:265–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAigmueller T, Dungl A, Hinterholzer S, Geiss I, Riss P. An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(3):299–302spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNüssler E, Kesmodel US chiøler, Löfgren M, Nüssler EK arl. Operation for primary cystocele with anterior colporrhaphy or non-absorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):359–66.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTsai C, Hung M, Shen P, Chen G, Su T, Chou M. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Factors that affect early recurrence after prolapse repair by a nonanchored vaginal mesh procedure. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014;53(3):337–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2014.07.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRichter LA, Sokol AI. Pelvic Organ Prolapse---Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh. The Evidence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(1):83–92.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEllington DR, Richter HE. Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56(2):276–88.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSu TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH. Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;25(7):901–8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUnger CA, Matthew D. Vaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery : Controversies , Current Use , and Complications. 2015;58(4):740–53.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTrial ARC. Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse. 2010;116(2):293–303.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGutman RE, Nosti PA, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Peterson JL, Wang H, et al. Three-year outcomes of vaginal mesh for prolapse a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):770–7.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSociety AT. American Thoracic Society SERIE DE INFORMACIÓN AL PACIENTE www.thoracic.org ¿Qué es la bronquitis crónica? VÍA AÉREA NORMAL VÍA AÉREA CON BRONQUITIS. 2013;171(September):3–4. Available from: http://www.thoracic.org/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationW Kerner JB. Definition,Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. 2014;3:1–3.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCracken JL, Veeranki SP, Ameredes BT, Calhoun WJ. Diagnosis and management of asthma in adults a review. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318(3):279–90.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlin BR. Hypertension: The Silent Killer: Updated JNC8 Guideline Recommendations Associate Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Drug Information and Learning Resource Center. 2015;spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLüscher TF. Cardiomyopathies: Definition, diagnosis, causes, and genetics. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1779–82.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWHO FCTC. Compilation of terms and definitions. World Heal Organ. 2001;17:1–47.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTachibana C, White A, Johnson N. Unit 8: Cell Biology and Cancer. Rediscovering Biol Mol to Glob Perspect. 2001;1–17.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWeber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JPWR. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2014;26(1):15–28.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarambio G. A, Sandoval S. C, Valdevenito S. R, Naser n. M, Manríquez G. V, Guzmán R. R, et al. Prolapso genital. Etiopatogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Hosp Clín Univ Chile [Internet]. 2011;22:211–20. Available from: https://www.redclinica.cl/Portals/0/Users/014/14/14/Publicaciones/Revista/prolapso_genital_1.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCésar P, Palma R, Vale M, Monteiro DC, Ledesma MA, Altuna S, et al. Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation : A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up. 2018;22(3):177–84.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, et al. Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2, Part 1):293–303.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHüsch T, Mager R, Ober E, Bentler R, Ulm K, Haferkamp A. Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;33:36–41.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKinjo M, Yoshimura Y, Kitagawa Y, Okegawa T, Nutahara K. Sexual activity and quality of life in Japanese pelvic organ prolapse patients after transvaginal mesh surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(7):1302–7.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTakazawa N, Fujisaki A, Yoshimura Y, Tsujimura A, Horie S. Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Investig Clin Urol. 2018;59(2):133.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDonna Mazloomdoost, MD, Rachel N. Pauls, MD, Steven D. Kleeman, MD, and Catrina C. Crisp, MD Ms. Outcomes and Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Surgical Management for Mesh Related Complications. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;00(00):547–8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWang CL, Long CY, Juan YS, Liu CM, Hsu CS. Impact of total vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115(2):167–70.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLong CY, Juan YS, Wu MP, Liu CM, Chiang PH, Tsai EM. Changes in Female Sexual Function following Anterior with and without Posterior Vaginal Mesh Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J Sex Med. 2012;9(8):2167–74spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLong CY, Hsu CS, Wu MP, Lo TS, Liu CM, Tsai EM. Comparison of the changes in sexual function of premenopausal and postmenopausal women following transvaginal mesh surgery. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):2009–16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHuang WC, Lin TY, Lau HH, Chen SS, Hsieh CH, Su TH. Outcome of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery with Prolift after a median of 2 years’ follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):197–203.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationProlapse O. Vaginal Placement of Synthetic Mesh for Pelvic. 2011;118(513):1459–64.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMph ML, Geoffrion R, Walter J. No . 351-Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2017;39(11):1085–97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMateu Arrom L, Errando Smet C, Gutierrez Ruiz C, Araño P, Palou Redorta J. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Mid-Term Efficacy and Complications. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):201–5.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlazener CMA, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet [Internet]. 2017;389(10067):381–92. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673616315963spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDelroy CA, De A. Castro R, Dias MM, Feldner PC, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, et al. The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: A randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1899–907spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWu Y (Maria), Reid J, Chou Q, MacMillan B, Leong Y, Welk B. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3792-2spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAube M, Guerin M, Rheaume C, Tu LM. Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective. Can Urol Assoc J = J l’Association des Urol du Canada. 2018 Oct;12(10):E432–7.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectPiso pélvicospa
dc.subjectIncontinencia urinariaspa
dc.subjectTransvaginalspa
dc.subject.ddcGinecología & otras especialidades médicasspa
dc.subject.keywordPelvic Organ Prolaps Cuantification Systemspa
dc.subject.keywordGraftspa
dc.subject.keywordMeshspa
dc.subject.keywordProlapse Quality of Life Questionnairespa
dc.subject.lembProlapso uterinospa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades del úterospa
dc.titleCalidad de vida, resultados y complicaciones en pacientes intervenidas de colpopexia con malla. Hospital Universitario Mayor 2015– 2018spa
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.documentTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Calidad-de-vida,-resultados-y-complicaciones-en-pacientes-intervenidas-de-colpopexia-con-malla.-Hospital-Universitario-Mayor-2015–-2018.pdf
Tamaño:
2.13 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Especialización en Ginecología y Obstetricia