Ítem
Desconocido

Opioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery

dc.contributor.advisorLaverde Frade, Leonardo
dc.creatorAbaunza Camacho, Juan Felipe
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Neurología
dc.creator.degreeLevelMaestría
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-17T13:57:06Z
dc.date.available2025-02-17T13:57:06Z
dc.date.created2024-04-03
dc.descriptionBackground: Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF). Methods We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable. Results We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases. Conclusion Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Opioids are medications frequently used in patients with moderate and severe chronic pain. Their pharmacologic profile allows their use in acute severe postoperative pain. However, due to their highly addictive profile, opioid misuse is considered a public health issue. Vertebral spine fusion, decompression, and instrumentation are often associated with acute, severe postoperative pain. The present study aims to compare postoperative opioid consumption in a group of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) against a similar group of patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MTLIF). Methods We present a quantitative, observational, analytical, and historical cohort study. After convenience sampling, we identified 45 patients, 34 of whom underwent OTLIF and 11 underwent MTLIF. The analysis was made after measuring the following variables: demographics, type of surgery, length of stay, pain control, opioid type, and opioid dose. Statistical methods were implemented according to the origin and behavior of the variable. Results We found a difference between significant and nonsignificant pain among the groups with less opioid consumption in the MTILF group. This difference was seen in the frequency and dosage during all observation periods. However, in the postoperative observation, the frequencies and dosages were equal between groups. According to linear regression, the type of surgery, radiculopathy, and radiculitis explain the significant postoperative pain in up to 50% of cases. Conclusion Our study reveals a significant difference in opioid consumption between patients undergoing different surgical techniques. While these findings are valid for the studied population, the limitation in sample size highlights the need for further research. The implications of our findings on postoperative pain management and opioid use in spinal surgeries are significant and warrant continued investigation.
dc.format.extent9 pp
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1792141
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44985
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Neurocirugía
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.accesoBloqueado (Texto referencial)
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoulterJH,CurryBP,WelchMC,etal.199protocolizationofpost- transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionpaincontrolwithelimi- nationofbenzodiazepinesandlong-actingopioids.Neurosurgery 2018;65(CN_suppl_1):115–115
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGomesT,TadrousM,MamdaniMM,PatersonJM,JuurlinkDN.The burdenofopioid-relatedmortalityintheUnitedStates.JAMA NetwOpen2018;1(02):e180217
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWilsonN,KariisaM,SethP,SmithHIV,DavisNL.Drugandopioid- involvedoverdosedeaths:UnitedStates,2017-2018.MMWR MorbMortalWklyRep2020;69(11):290–297
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFlorenceCS,ZhouC,LuoF,XuL.Theeconomicburdenof prescriptionopioidoverdose,abuse,anddependenceinthe UnitedStates,2013.MedCare2016;54(10):901–906
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOleiskyER,PenningsJS,HillsJ,etal.Comparingdifferentchronic preoperativeopioidusedefinitionsonoutcomesafterspine surgery.SpineJ2019;19(06):984–994
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVolinnE,FargoJD,FinePG.Opioidtherapyfornonspecific low back painandtheoutcomeofchronicworkloss.Pain2009;142 (03):194–201
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShah A,HayesCJ,MartinBC.Characteristicsofinitialprescription episodesandlikelihoodoflong-termopioiduse:UnitedStates, 2006-2015.MMWRMorbMortalWklyRep2017;66(10): 265–269
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMendoza-EliasN,DunbarM,GhogawalaZ,WhitmoreRG.Opioid use,riskfactors,andoutcomeinlumbarfusionsurgery.World Neurosurg2020;135:e580–e587
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDeyoRA,HallvikSE,HildebranC,etal.Useofprescriptionopioids beforeandafteranoperationforchronicpain(lumbarfusion surgery).Pain2018;159(06):1147–1154
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention(CDC)Vitalsigns: overdosesofprescriptionopioidpainrelievers:UnitedStates, 1999–2008.MMWRMorbMortalWklyRep2011;60(43): 1487–1492
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGe DH,HockleyA,Vasquez-MontesD,etal.Totalinpatient morphinemilligramequivalentscanpredictlong-termopioid useaftertransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion.Spine2019;44 (20):1465–1470
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArmaghaniSJ,LeeDS,BibleJE,etal.Increasedpreoperative narcoticuseanditsassociationwithpostoperativecomplications andlengthofhospitalstayinpatientsundergoingspinesurgery. ClinSpineSurg2016;29(02):E93–E98
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaitoT,MatsuyamaY,YamashitaT,etal;ProjectCommitteeofthe JapaneseSocietyforSpineSurgeryandRelatedResearch(JSSR) Cost-effectivenessanalysisofthepharmacologicalmanagement of chroniclowbackpainwithfourleadingdrugs.JOrthopSci 2019;24(05):805–811
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChengJS,ParkP,LeH,ReisnerL,ChouD,MummaneniPV.Short- termandlong-termoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveandopen transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusions:isthereadifference? NeurosurgFocus2013;35(02):E6
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeeMJ,MokJ,PatelP.Transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion: traditionalopenversusminimallyinvasivetechniques.JAmAcad OrthopSurg2018;26(04):124–131
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLyDP.Evaluationandtreatmentpatternsofnewlowbackpain episodesforelderlyadultsintheUnitedStates,2011-2014.Med Care2020;58(02):108–113
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKhorS,LavalleeD,CizikAM,etal.Developmentandvalidationofa predictionmodelforpainandfunctionaloutcomesafterlumbar spinesurgery.JAMASurg2018;153(07):634–642
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectSpine
dc.subjectArthrodesis
dc.subject.keywordSpine
dc.subject.keywordArthrodesis
dc.subject.keywordNeurosurgery
dc.subject.keywordOpioids
dc.subject.keywordPain management
dc.titleOpioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery
dc.title.TranslatedTitleOpioid Use after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery
dc.typebachelorThesis
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículo
local.department.reportEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
local.regionesBogotá
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Opioid_use_after_transforaminal_Lumbar.pdf
Tamaño:
527.06 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: