Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Factores que influyen en la aceptación y uso de nuevas tecnologías en fisioterapeutas

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorForero Nieto, Sandra Liliana
dc.creatorIzquierdo Martínez, Laura Catalina
dc.creatorRengifo Varona, María Leonor
dc.creator.degreeMagister en Ciencias de la Rehabilitaciónspa
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T05:37:29Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T05:37:29Z
dc.date.created2020-11-17
dc.descriptionEn fisioterapia, el uso de las nuevas tecnologías en rehabilitación ha venido aumentando en los últimos años (Lum, Reinkensmeyer, Mahoney, Rymer, y Burgar, 2002). Aún es muy escasa la evidencia que deja claro el qué hace que un fisioterapeuta use cierta tecnología o qué factores son decisivos para la aceptación de algunas tecnologías por parte de los terapeutas (Gaggioli, Keshner, Weiss, & Riva, 2009), adicionalmente, se tiene la concepción de que muchos profesionales de la rehabilitación se sienten incómodos con la tecnología y temen que pueda tomar el lugar de las interacciones individualizadas con los pacientes; tampoco está claro si los fisioterapeutas, incluso aceptarían usar las nuevas tecnologías aun estando disponibles como opciones de tratamiento (Chen y Bode, 2011). Es por esto que el objetivo de este trabajo es identificar los factores personales, tecnológicos y sociales que influyen en la aceptación y uso de nueva tecnología en rehabilitación por parte de los fisioterapeutas en un centro de rehabilitación del municipio de Chía; contribuyendo en la construcción de conocimiento del campo de ciencias de la rehabilitación, en tanto que se sitúa en la línea de estudios tecnológicos en rehabilitación y ayuda a transferir el conocimiento científico-tecnológico que apoye en la evaluación de las tecnologías en rehabilitación. Para el desarrollo del presente estudio, se llevará a cabo un diseño de métodos mixtos con una estrategia de triangulación recurrente en donde en un inicio se realizará una encuesta cuantitativa con una escala de Likert de 5 puntos que será enviada vía email a cada uno de los participantes; y, posteriormente, se realizarán entrevistas semiestructuradas con los fisioterapeutas hasta alcanzar el punto de saturación en donde se realizarán preguntas relacionadas con las actitudes, emociones, motivaciones o sentimientos que experimentan los fisioterapeutas con el uso de nueva tecnología en rehabilitaciónspa
dc.description.abstractIn physiotherapy, the use of new technologies in rehabilitation has been increasing in recent years (Lum, Reinkensmeyer, Mahoney, Rymer, & Burgar, 2002). There is still very little evidence that makes it clear what makes a physiotherapist use certain technology or what factors are decisive for the acceptance of some technologies by therapists (Gaggioli, Keshner, Weiss, & Riva, 2009). has the conception that many rehabilitation professionals are uncomfortable with technology and fear that it can take the place of individualized interactions with patients; It is also not clear whether physiotherapists would even agree to use new technologies even when they are available as treatment options (Chen and Bode, 2011). That is why the objective of this work is to identify the personal, technological and social factors that influence the acceptance and use of new technology in rehabilitation by physiotherapists in a rehabilitation center in the municipality of Chía; contributing to the construction of knowledge in the field of rehabilitation sciences, as it is in the line of technological studies in rehabilitation and helps to transfer scientific-technological knowledge that supports the evaluation of technologies in rehabilitation. For the development of this study, a mixed methods design will be carried out with a recurrent triangulation strategy where initially a quantitative survey will be carried out with a 5-point Likert scale that will be sent via email to each of the participants; and, subsequently, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the physiotherapists until the saturation point was reached where questions were asked related to the attitudes, emotions, motivations or feelings that physiotherapists experience with the use of new technology in rehabilitationspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_30832
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/30832
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Ciencias de la Rehabilitaciónspa
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD 2009 Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78: 115-126.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlaiad A, Zhou L 2014 The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International journal of medical informatics. 83:825-840spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlarcón AC, Díaz EL, Callejas M 2014 Guía para la evaluación de la usabilidad en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje (EVA). Informacion Tecnologica 25:134-144spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAwwal M, Wharrad H, Windle R 2018 Towards understanding healthcare professionals’ adoption and use of technologies in clinical practice: using Q-methodology and models of technology acceptance. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 25: 027–037spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBelloso de Núñez N, Mendoza N 2015 Usabilidad de sitios web para la transparencia de la gestión en alcaldías. Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios En Ciencias Sociales 17:418-437.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBevan N, Carter J 2016 Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice. Toronto: Masaaki Kurosuspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBhattacherjee A 2001 Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 25:351-370spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBidar R, Fard MB, Salman YB, Tunga MA, Cheng HI 2014 Factors affecting the adoption of mobile banking: Sample of Turkey. Paper presented at: 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Pyeongchangspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBonnechère B 2018. Serious Games in Physical Rehabilitation: From theory to practice. Switzerland: Springerspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCavallo F, Aquilano M, Arvati M 2015 An ambient assisted living approach in designing domiciliary services combined with innovative technologies for patients with alzheimer’s disease: A case study. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 30: 69-77.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChao CM 2019 Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology 10 [In press] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChao LC, Skibniewski MJ 1995. Neural network method of estimating construction technology acceptability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 121: 130-142spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChau PYK, Hu PJH 2002 Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information and Management 39: 297–311spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChen CC, Bode RK 2011 Factors Influencing Therapists’ Decision-Making in the Acceptance of New Technology Devices in Stroke Rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 90: 415–425spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCooper RA, Dicianno BE, Brewer B, LoPresti E, Ding D, Simpson R, Grindle G, Wang H 2008 A perspective on intelligent devices and environments in medical rehabilitation. Medical Engineering and Physics, 30:1387–1398spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCreswell JW 2009 Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE publications. 3th edspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDarragh AR, Campo MA, Frost L, Miller M, Pentico M, Margulis H 2013 Safe-Patient-Handling Equipment in Therapy Practice: Implications for Rehabilitation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 67: 45-53spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDavis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR 1992 Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22: 1111-1132spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDwivedi YK, Rana NP, Jeyaraj A, Clement M, Williams MD 2019 Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Information Systems Frontiers 21: 719–734spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEicher C, Haesner M, Spranger M, Kuzmicheva O, Gräser A, Steinhagen-Thiessen E 2019 Usability and acceptability by a younger and older user group regarding a mobile robot-supported gait rehabilitation system. Assistive Technology 31:25-33spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFederici S, Borsci S 2014. Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 11:22-31.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGaggioli A, Keshner EA, Weiss P, Riva G 2009 Advanced Technologies in rehabilitation: Empowering Cognitive, Physical, Social and Communicative Skills through Virtual Reality, Robots, Wearable Systems and Brain-Computer Interfaces. Netherlands: IOS Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGonzález E 2013 Validación de la Teoría Unificada de Aceptación y Uso de la Tecnología UTAUT en castellano en el ámbito de las consultas externas de la Red de Salud. Master dissertation, Universitat Oberta de Catalunyaspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHamilton C, McCluskey A, Hassett L, Killington M, Lovarini M 2018. Patient and therapist experiences of using affordable feedback-based technology in rehabilitation: a qualitative study nested in a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 32:1-13.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen H 2012 Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 9:1-12spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoque R, Sorwar G 2018 Understanding Factors Influencing the Adoption of mHealth by the Elderly : An Extension of the UTAUT Model International Journal of Medical Informatics Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly : An extension of the UTAUT mo. International Journal of Medical Informatics 101: 75–84.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Organization for Standaritation 2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO 9241). Online Browsing Platform. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:enspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIfinedo P 2012 Technology acceptance by health professionals in Canada: An analysis with a modified UTAUT model. Paper presented at: 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciencesspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJewer J 2018 Patients’ intention to use online postings of ED wait times: A modified UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics 112: 34–39spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaleshtari MH, Ciobanu I, Seiciu PL, Marin AG, Berteanu M 2016 Towards a Model of Rehabilitation Technology Acceptance and Usability. International journal of Social Science and Humanity 6: 612-616spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM 2009 Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78: 404–416spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKoufaris M 2002 Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research 13:205-223spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKrebs HI, Volpe BT 2013. Rehabilitation Robotics. In: Barners MP, Good DC (Eds) Handbook of Clinical Neurology (1st ed), p. 283-294. Elsevier B.Vspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLiebenberg J, Benade T, Ellis S. 2018. Acceptance of ICT: Applicability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to South African Students. The African Journal of Information Systems 10:160-173spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLin CP, Anol B 2008 Learning online social support: An investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 11:268-272.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLiu L, Miguel A, Rios A, Buttar V, Ranson Q, Goertzen D 2015. What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation-a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disability and Rehabilitation 37: 447–455.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C 2002 Robotic Devices for Movement Therapy After Stroke: Current Status and Challenges to Clinical Acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 8: 40–53spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarchewka JT, Kostiwa K 2007 An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software. Communications of the IIMA 7:93-104.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMartínez E, Galán M 2017. Nuevas Tecnologías y su aplicación en Rehabilitación Neurológica. Publicaciones Didácticas 82: 487–489spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMartínez M, Rios A 2006. La tecnología en rehabilitación: una aproximación conceptual. Revista Ciencias de La Salud 4: 98–108.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMazzoleni S, Turchetti G, Palla I, Posteraro F, Dario P 2014 Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: Preliminary results on chronic stroke patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 116: 116–122.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcGrath C, Ellis M, Harney-Levine S, Wright D, Williams EA, Hwang F, Astell A 2017 Investigating the enabling factors influencing occupational therapists’ adoption of assisted living technology. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 80: 668–675.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNational Institute of child Health and Human Development 2015 ¿Cuáles son algunos tipos de tecnologías de rehabilitación? [Tecnología de rehabilitación y asistencia]. National Institute of Health website. Kennedy,US. https://www1.nichd.nih.gov/espanol/salud/temas/rehabtech/informacion/Pages/tipos-rehab.aspxspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNielsen J 1993. Usability engineering. California: Academic Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNuq PA, Aubert B 2013 Towards a better understanding of the intention to use ehealth services by medical professionals: The case of developing countries. International Journal of Healthcare Managementa 6:217-236spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlkowski BF, Stolfi AM 2014 Safe patient handling perceptions and practices: a survey of acute care physical therapists. Physical Therapy 94: 682-695.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOnwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KMT 2007. A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science. The Qualitative Report 12:281–316.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPortney LG, Watkins MP 2015 Foundations of clinical research : applications to practice. Pearson: New Jersey.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuintero J, Gómez J 2017. Análisis correlacional de las variables asociadas a la intención de uso de la banca digital en Colombia a través del modelo UTAUT2. Master dissertation, Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRichards P, Simpson S, Bastiampillai T, Pietrabissa G, Castelnuovo G 2018 The impact of technology on therapeutic alliance and engagement in psychotherapy: The therapist’s perspective. Clinical Psychologist 22:171-181.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchaper LK, Pervan GP 2007 ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76: 212–221.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScherer MJ, Federici S 2015 Why people use and don’t use technologies: Introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. NeuroRehabilitation 37:315–319.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSitorus HM, Govindaraju R, Wiratmadja II, Sudirman I 2019 Examining the role of usability, compatibility and social influence in mobile banking adoption in Indonesia. International Journal of Technology 10:351-362spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSklar DP 2019 The influence of technology on health professions education and health care delivery: New opportunities and responsibilities for health professions educators. Academic Medicine 94:607-609.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSquires LA, Williams N, Morrison VL 2019 Matching and accepting assistive technology in multiple sclerosis: A focus group study with people with multiple sclerosis, carers and occupational therapists. Journal of Health Psychology 24: 480-494.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSwinnen E, Lefeber N, Willaert W, De Neef F, Bruyndonckx L, Spooren A, Michielsen M, Ramon T, Kerckhofs E 2017 Motivation, expectations, and usability of a driven gait orthosis in stroke patients and their therapists. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 24: 299–308.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThomas T, Singh L, Gaffar K 2013. The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology 9:71-85.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVenkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD 2003. User acceptance of information technology:Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVenkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X 2012. Consumer acceptance and user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36:157–178.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZhou T, Lu Y, Wang B 2010 Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior 26:760-767.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectTecnologías de la rehabilitaciónspa
dc.subjectEstudios tecnológicos en rehabilitaciónspa
dc.subjectTeoría unificada de aceptación y uso de tecnologíaspa
dc.subjectFactores psicosociales en la adopción de nuevas tecnologíasspa
dc.subject.ddcFarmacología & terapéuticaspa
dc.subject.keywordRehabilitation technologiesspa
dc.subject.keywordTechnological studies in rehabilitationspa
dc.subject.keywordUnified theory of acceptance and use of technologyspa
dc.subject.keywordPsychosocial factors in the adoption of new technologiesspa
dc.titleFactores que influyen en la aceptación y uso de nuevas tecnologías en fisioterapeutasspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleFactors that influence the acceptance and use of new technologies in physiotherapistseng
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.documentArtículospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTesis de maestríaspa
local.department.reportEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Saludspa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
Resumen-Ejecutivo-comite-de-etica.pdf
Tamaño:
514.82 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Artículo
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Sustentacion.pdf
Tamaño:
1.61 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Dispositivas sustentaciòn
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ANEXO 1. ENCUESTA.pdf
Tamaño:
186.03 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexo
Descargar
Colecciones
Maestría en Ciencias de la Rehabilitación