Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Why the Taliban poppy ban was very unlikely to have been sustained after a couple of years

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorThoumi, Francisco E.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T16:21:29Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T16:21:29Z
dc.date.created2005-03spa
dc.description.abstractProfessors Farrell and Thorne (2005) have written an interesting paper that shows that the Taliban’s ban on opium poppy cultivation in 2000 resulted in dramatic declines of 90.8% in the number of hectares cultivated with poppy in Afghanistan and 35% in the size of illegal poppy plantings in the world. Since the Taliban controlled area in Afghanistan had the highest opium yield per hectare, the declines in opium production were even larger: 94.3% in Afghanistan and 65.3% in the world! Farrell and Thorne, without praising or defending the Taliban, argue that “this may have been the most effective drug control action of modern times” achieved though a combination of “three principal techniques: the threat of punishment, the close local monitoring and eradication of continued poppy farming, plus the public punishment of transgressors”eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.01.008
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0955-3959
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26373
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherElsevierspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage109
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage108
dc.relation.citationTitleInternational Journal of Drug Policy
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 16
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Drug Policy, ISSN: 0955-3959, Vol.16, No.2 (March, 2005); pp.108-109spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0955395905000174?via%3Dihubspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.accesoRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)spa
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Drug Policyspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keywordDiamorphinespa
dc.subject.keywordIllicit drugspa
dc.subject.keywordOpiatespa
dc.subject.keywordAfghanistanspa
dc.subject.keywordBudgetspa
dc.subject.keywordCrop productionspa
dc.subject.keywordDroughtspa
dc.subject.keywordDrug controlspa
dc.subject.keywordDrug costspa
dc.subject.keywordDrug legislationspa
dc.subject.keywordDrug trafficspa
dc.subject.keywordEuropespa
dc.subject.keywordGovernmentspa
dc.subject.keywordHarvestspa
dc.subject.keywordHumanspa
dc.subject.keywordMalnutritionspa
dc.subject.keywordMarketspa
dc.subject.keywordMonitoringspa
dc.subject.keywordMoslemspa
dc.subject.keywordNotespa
dc.subject.keywordPlantspa
dc.subject.keywordPolicyspa
dc.subject.keywordPriority journalspa
dc.subject.keywordPunishmentspa
dc.subject.keywordStarvationspa
dc.subject.keywordTaxspa
dc.subject.keywordUnited nationsspa
dc.titleWhy the Taliban poppy ban was very unlikely to have been sustained after a couple of yearsspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitlePor qué la prohibición de la amapola talibán era poco probable que se hubiera sostenido después de un par de añosspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos