Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Arbitral interpretation of investment treaties: Problems and remedies for the debate on legitimacy
dc.creator | Díaz-Cediel S. | spa |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-26T00:03:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-26T00:03:33Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019 | spa |
dc.description.abstract | The last couple of decades have seen a considerable increase in the submittal of investment claims to Arbitral Tribunals, a process which has often been linked to the “proliferation” of investment treaties. Alongside, a debate on the so-called “legitimacy” of the Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism has emerged - and prompted calls for reform - refusing, for the moment, to go away. Treaty interpretation has not been in the forefront of discussion. Authorized (“authoritative”) interpretation - as performed by Arbitral Tribunals - is perhaps one of the issues of least (if any) concern. This Article explores the multiple issues arising from vesting excessive significance in authorized interpretations of Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals (in the events in which States Parties to the relevant investment treaty do not have opposing views on the construction of a conventional clause) vis-à-vis the distinction between authentic and authorized interpretation. Drawing on the referral to the notable cases in which this issue has arisen, this Article will present a few recommendations. © 2019 Centro Universitario de Brasilia. All rights reserved. | eng |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v16i1.5883 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2236997X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 22371036 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23604 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
dc.publisher | Centro Universitario de Brasilia | spa |
dc.relation.citationEndPage | 88 | |
dc.relation.citationIssue | No. 1 | |
dc.relation.citationStartPage | 74 | |
dc.relation.citationTitle | Brazilian Journal of International Law | |
dc.relation.citationVolume | Vol. 16 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian Journal of International Law, ISSN:2236997X, 22371036, Vol.16, No.1 (2019); pp. 74-88 | spa |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072806029&doi=10.5102%2frdi.v16i1.5883&partnerID=40&md5=4e6bce0f472734d29726375dc085c869 | spa |
dc.rights.accesRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights.acceso | Abierto (Texto Completo) | spa |
dc.source.instname | instname:Universidad del Rosario | spa |
dc.source.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR | spa |
dc.subject.keyword | Authentic Interpretation | spa |
dc.subject.keyword | Authoritative Interpretation | spa |
dc.subject.keyword | International Arbitration | spa |
dc.subject.keyword | International Investment Law | spa |
dc.subject.keyword | Law of Treaties | spa |
dc.title | Arbitral interpretation of investment treaties: Problems and remedies for the debate on legitimacy | spa |
dc.title.alternative | Arbitral interpretation of investment treaties: Problems and remedies for the debate on “legitimacy | spa |
dc.type | article | eng |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type.spa | Artículo | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- 5883-25619-1-PB.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.22 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción: