Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of age

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorRamírez-Giraldo, Camilospa
dc.creatorIsaza-Restrepo, Andrésspa
dc.creatorRico-Rivera, Ximenaspa
dc.creatorVallejo-Soto, Juan Carlosspa
dc.creatorVan-Londoño, Isabella spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T18:28:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T18:28:01Z
dc.date.created2023-12-01spa
dc.date.issued2023spa
dc.descriptionBackground: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for acute calculous cholecystitis; however, in patients at high risk for surgery, particularly in the elderly, insertion of a percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) at gallbladder is recommended. Current evidence suggests that PCD may have less favorable outcomes than LC, but also that LC-associated complications increase in direct relation to patient age. There is no recommendation supported by robust evidence to decide between one or the other procedure in super elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed to analyze the surgical outcomes of super elderly patients with cholecystitis who underwent LC versus PCD for treatment. The surgical outcomes of a subgroup of high-risk patients were also analyzed. Results: A total of 96 patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2021 were included. The median age of patients were 92 years (IQR: 4.00) with a female predominance (58.33%). The overall morbidity rate in the series was 36.45% and mortality rate was 7.29%. There was no statistically significant difference when compared to the associated morbidity and mortality among patients who underwent LC versus those who underwent PCD, neither in the analysis of the complete series or in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality associated with the two most frequently recommended therapeutic options for operating super elderly patients with acute cholecystitis are high. We found no evidence of superiority in outcomes for either of the two procedures in this age group.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7spa
dc.identifier.issn1435-2443spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42138
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-023-02903-7.pdfspa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourceLangenbeck's Archives of Surgeryspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectElderlyspa
dc.subjectcholecystostomyspa
dc.subjectcholecystectomyspa
dc.subjectcomplicationsspa
dc.titleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients over 90 years of agespa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter.pdf
Tamaño:
536.54 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos