Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Evaluating the Accuracy of the SIL Score for Predicting the Sepsis Mortality in Emergency Department Triages: A Comparative Analysis with NEWS and SOFA

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorDevia Jaramillo, German
dc.creatorErazo Guerrero, Lilia
dc.creatorFlorez Zuñiga, Natalia
dc.creatorMartin Cuesta, Ronal Mauricio
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-26T12:28:03Z
dc.date.available2025-03-26T12:28:03Z
dc.date.created2024-12-20
dc.descriptionEl SIL score es una escala que utiliza el índice de shock y el nivel de lactato arterial para identificar precozmente a los pacientes que tienen un alto riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria por sepsis como herramienta temprana en su detección. El score SIL demostro una capacidad superior comparadas con escalas como NEWS y SOFA.
dc.description.abstractSepsis is a disease with a high mortality rate, which emphasizes the importance of developing tools for the early identification of high-risk patients and to initiate timely treatments to reduce mortality. The SIL score is a scale that uses the shock index and arterial lactate level to identify early on the patients that are at a high risk of in-hospital mortality due to sepsis. The purpose of this study was to validate the SIL score as a tool for estimating the probability of sepsis in-hospital mortality from the triage room in emergency departments. Additionally, the advantages of the SIL score were evaluated in comparison with NEWS and SOFA. Methods: All of the patients with suspected sepsis were prospectively recruited from the triage room in an emergency department. The SIL score, as well as other evaluation scales, were calculated for these patients. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and areas under the curve (AUC) of each scale were assessed to predict mortality. Results: This study included 315 patients. The total mortality of the cohort was 20.4%. Of the total population, 35.5% were in septic shock. The SIL, NEWS, and SOFA scores had similar sensitivities, approximately 60%; however, a higher specificity was documented in the SIL score over the other scales (67%). The SIL score demonstrated superior discriminatory ability compared to the NEWS and SOFA scores (AUC = 0.754, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The SIL score proved to be a useful tool for predicting in-hospital mortality due to sepsis. Its discriminatory ability surpasses that of other evaluated scales. Therefore, the SIL score can be successfully implemented in the triage room of emergency departments to improve the identification and early management of patients with sepsis.
dc.format.extent10 pp
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.geoLocationHospital Universitario Fundación Santafe de Bogotá
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247787
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/45149
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRudd, K.E.; Johnson, S.C.; Agesa, K.M.; Shackelford, K.A.; Tsoi, D.; Kievlan, D.R.; Colombara, D.V.; Ikuta, K.S.; Kissoon, N.; Finfer, S.; et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020, 395, 200–211. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHusabø, G.; Nilsen, R.M.; Flaatten, H.; Solligård, E.; Frich, J.C.; Bondevik, G.T.; Braut, G.S.; Walshe, K.; Harthug, S.; Hovlid, E. Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study. PLoS ONE2020, 15, e0227652. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngus, D.C.; van der Poll, T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 840–851. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Osborn, T.M. Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Trials (ProCESS, ARISE, ProMISe): What is Optimal Resuscitation? Crit. Care Clin. 2017, 33, 323–344. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQiu, X.; Lei, Y.P.; Zhou, R.X. SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2023, 21, 891–900. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSinger, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJouffroy, R.; Pierre Tourtier, J.; Gueye, P.; Bloch-Laine, E.; Bounes, V.; Debaty, G.; Boularan, J.; Carli, P.; Vivien, B. Prehospital shock index to assess 28-day mortality for septic shock. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 38, 1352–1356. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEvans, L.; Rhodes, A.; Alhazzani, W.; Antonelli, M.; Coopersmith, C.M.; French, C.; Machado, F.R.; Mcintyre, L.; Ostermann, M.; Prescott, H.C.; et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021, 47, 1181–1247. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbdullah, S.O.B.; Sørensen, R.H.; Nielsen, F.E. Prognostic Accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS for Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients with Infections. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 2763–2775. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThodphetch, M.; Chenthanakij, B.; Wittayachamnankul, B.; Sruamsiri, K.; Tangsuwanaruk, T. A comparison of scoring systems for predicting mortality and sepsis in the emergency department patients with a suspected infection. Clin. Exp. Emerg. Med. 2021, 8, 289–295. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDevia Jaramillo, G.; Ibáñez Pinilla, M. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Procalcitonin for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Death in Elderly Patients with Suspicion of Sepsis in the Emergency Department, Based on Sepsis-3 Definition. Gerontology 2021, 68, 171–180. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOduncu, A.F.; Kıyan, G.S.; Yalçınlı, S. Comparison of qSOFA, SIRS, and NEWS scoring systems for diagnosis, mortality, and morbidity of sepsis in emergency department. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 48, 54–59. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWang,C.; Xu, R.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, X. A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0266755. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuangsomboon, O.; Boonmee, P.; Limsuwat, C.; Chakorn, T.; Monsomboon, A. The utility of the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) compared with SIRS, qSOFA and NEWS for Predicting in-hospital Mortality among Patients with suspicion of Sepsis in an emergency department. BMC Emerg. Med. 2021, 21, 2. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaig, M.A.; Sheikh, S.; Hussain, E.; Bakhtawar, S.; Subhan Khan, M.; Mujtaba, S.; Waheed, S. Comparison of qSOFA and SOFA score for predicting mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department of a low middle income country. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2018, 18, 148–151. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLee, H.J.; Ko, B.S.; Ryoo, S.M.; Han, E.; Suh, G.J.; Choi, S.-H.; Chung, S.P.; Lim, T.H.; Kim, W.Y.; Kwon, W.Y.; et al. Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: Development and internal and external validation. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 263, Erratum in BMCMed. 2022, 20, 476. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02694-6. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRaith, E.P.; Udy, A.A.; Bailey, M.; McGloughlin, S.; MacIsaac, C.; Bellomo, R.; Pilcher, D.V.; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA 2017, 317, 290. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThePRISMInvestigators. Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock—A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2223–2234. [CrossRef]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngus, D.C.; Barnato, A.E.; Bell, D.; Bellomo, R.; Chong, C.R.; Coats, T.J.; Davies, A.; Delaney, A.; Harrison, D.A.; Holdgate, A.; et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: The ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med. 2015, 41, 1549–1560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBauer, M.; Gerlach, H.; Vogelmann, T.; Preissing, F.; Stiefel, J.; Adam, D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019—Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2020, 24, 239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFleischmann, C.; Scherag, A.; Adhikari, N.K.J.; Hartog, C.S.; Tsaganos, T.; Schlattmann, P.; Angus, D.C.; Reinhart, K.; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 259–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOsborn, T.M. Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Trials (ProCESS, ARISE, ProMISe): What is Optimal Resuscitation? Crit. Care Clin. 2017, 33, 323–344. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectNEWS
dc.subjectSOFA
dc.subjectMortalidad
dc.subjectDiagnóstico
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subjectAlto riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria
dc.subject.keywordNEWS
dc.subject.keywordSOFA
dc.subject.keywordSepsis
dc.subject.keywordDiagnosis
dc.subject.keywordMortality
dc.titleEvaluating the Accuracy of the SIL Score for Predicting the Sepsis Mortality in Emergency Department Triages: A Comparative Analysis with NEWS and SOFA
dc.typejournalArticle
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículo
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Evaluating_the_Accuracy_of_the_SIL_Scorejcm-13-07787.pdf
Tamaño:
965.27 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos