Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 1

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T23:24:55Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T23:24:55Z
dc.date.created2020-08-25
dc.descriptionLos mapas de ciencia (science mapping) son empleados para cartografiar las fronteras y pilares del conocimiento. Este trabajo presenta un compendio de mapas de la investigación en administración en América Latina y el Caribe (ALC) para el período 1998-2018. Se generó una visualización de redes para ALC (2018-2014) y para cada uno de los países de la región (1998-2018). Se empleó el acoplamiento bibliográfico a una muestra de más de 17 000 artículos extraídos de la base de datos bibliográficos Scopus. También se computaron propiedades de densidad e intermediación a cada red. El campo con mayor intermediación es la administración de la cadena de suministro y procesos de asociados con su desarrollo de manera sostenible. Otros campos con elevada intermediación son: estudios sobre el comportamiento del consumidor en los sectores de agricultura orgánica, ecoturismo y adopción de la innovación; multilatinas y Mipymes; proyectos de producción limpia en alianza universidad-empresa; estrategias de mejora continua en productividad y desempeño; estudios de género enfocados en el desarrollo de mujeres en cargos ejecutivos; y gestión de fondos de inversión y adopción de estándares contables. Se dispone el acceso abierto a los archivos para la elaboración del estudio.spa
dc.description.abstractScience mapping is used for drawing knowledge fronts and foundations. This study presents a set of maps of the research on management in Latin-America and the Caribbean (LAC) for the period (1998-2018). More than 17 000 articles were gathered from the bibliographic database Scopus and interrelated via bibliographic coupling. Network density and nodes’ betweenness were calculated. The research field with the highest betweenness was supply chain management and sustainable-related processes. The following fields/ topics were consumer behavior toward organic agriculture, ecotourism and innovation adoption, multilatinas and smes; cleaner production via corporateacademic alliances; continual improvement strategies for productivity and performance; gender studies focused on executive women career development; and funds management and accounting standards. All archives used for this study are open access.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_28293
dc.identifier.issn2463-1892
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28293
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 155
dc.relation.citationTitleDocumento de investigación
dc.relation.ispartofDocumento de investigación, ISSN: 2463-1892, No.155 (agosto, 2020); 51 pp.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScopus. (2018). Search. https://www.scopus.com/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCakir, A. (2019). How long should a research paper be? Quora. https:// www.quora.com/How-long-should-a-research-paper-bespa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWarren, M. (2019). Most comprehensive review to date finds the average person’s reading speed is slower than previously thought. Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2019/06/13/most-comprehensivereview- to-date-suggests-the-average-persons-reading-speed-is-slowerthan- commonly-thought/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: mapping paths to prosperity. The mit Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBörner, K. (2010). Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. The mit Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBörner, K., et al. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: the ucsd map of science. plos one, 7(7), e39464. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0039464spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428114562629spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNakamura, M., Pendlebury, D., Schnell, J., & Szomszor, M. (2019). Navigating the structure of research on sustainable development goals. Web of Science Group. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/campaigns/ sustainable-development-goals/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKlavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 68(4), 984-998. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.23734spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2020). A bibliometric outlook of the most cited documents in business, management and accounting in Ibero-America. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., 26(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. iedeen.2019.12.003spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRaewyn, C. (2019). The good university: what universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change. uk: Zed Books.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHaley, U., Page, M., Pitsis, T., Yu, K., & Rivas, J. (2017). Measuring and achieving scholarly impact. The Academy of Management. http://aom.org/About-AOM/StrategicPlan/Scholarly-Impact-Report. aspxspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKovács, A., Van Looy, B., & Cassiman, B. (2015). Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research. Scientometrics, 104(3), 951-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015- 1628-0spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: a bibliometric review. Int. J. Manag. Rev., 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGöbel, M., Vogel, R., & Weber, C. (2013). Management research on reciprocity: a review of the literature. Bus. Res., 6(1), 34-53. https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF03342741spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: a social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Inf. Process. Manag., 49(6), 1313-1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNosella, A., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: a bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Strateg. Organ., 10(4), 450-465. https://doi. org/10.1177/1476127012457979spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBelussi, F., Orsi, L., & Savarese, M. (2019). Mapping business model research: a document bibliometric analysis. Scand. J. Manag., 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101048spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFu, X., Niu, Z., & Yeh, M.-K. (2016). Research trends in sustainable operation: a bibliographic coupling clustering analysis from 1988 to 2016. Clust. Comput., 19(4), 2211-2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10586-016-0624-3spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYuan, Y., Gretzel, U., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2015). Revealing the nature of contemporary tourism research: extracting common subject areas through bibliographic coupling. Int. J. Tour. Res., 17(5), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Carvalho, G. D. G., Cruz, J. A. W., De Carvalho, H. G., Duclós, L. C., & De Fátima Stankowitz, R. (2017). Innovativeness measures: a bibliometric review and a classification proposal. Int. J. Innov. Sci., 9(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLazzarotti, F., Dalfovo, M. S., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2011). A bibliometric study of innovation based on Schumpeter. J. Technol. Manag. Innov., 6(4), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000400010spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLopes, A. P., & De Carvalho, M. M. (2012). The evolution of the literature on innovation in cooperative relationships: a bibliometric study for the last two decades. Gestao E Prod., 19(1), 203-217.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSilveira, F. F., & Zilber, S. N. (2017). Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag., 21(6), 459-484.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTanco, M., Escuder, M., Heckmann, G., Jurburg, D., & Velazquez, J. (2018). Supply chain management in Latin America: current research and future directions. Supply Chain Manag., 23(5), 412-430. https:// doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2017-0236spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationManjarrez, C. C. A., Pico, J. A. C., & Díaz, P. A. (2016). Industry interactions in innovation systems: a bibliometric study. Lat. Am. Bus. Rev., 17(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2016.1209036spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUddin, A., Singh, V. K., Pinto, D., & Olmos, I. (2015). Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 105(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1654-yspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2019). Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: crammed and fading away. Scientometrics, 121(2), 869-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03201-0spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Inf. Rev., 32(1), 8-21. https://doi. org/10.1108/14684520810865958spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGómez-Núñez, A. J., Vargas-Quesada, B., De Moya-Anegón, F., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Improving scimago Journal & Country Rank (sjr) subject classification through reference analysis. Scientometrics, 89(3), 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0485-8spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCentre for Science and Technology Studies (cwts). cwts Journal Indicators. http://www.journalindicators.comspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScopus. (2019). How Scopus works. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/ scopus/how-scopus-worksspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationscimago. (2018). scimago Journal Ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2018). Into oblivion: a closer look at the business, management and accounting research literature in Ibero-America. The Impact Blog - London School of Economics and Political Science. https://goo.gl/HWrgwLspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCladea. (2020). Miembros. https://www.cladea.org/es/miembros/ proceso-de-afiliacionspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc., 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKessler, M. (1963). An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers (Corresp.). ieee Trans. Inf. Theory, 9(1), 49- 51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1963.1057800spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIacobucci, D., McBride, R., Popovich, D., & Rouziou, M. (2017). In social network analysis, which centrality index should I use?: theoretical differences and empirical similarities among top centralities. J. Methods Meas. Soc. Sci., 8(2), 72-99.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038588022001007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOpsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw., 32(3), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGolbeck, J. (2015). Chapter 21. Analyzing networks. In J. Golbeck (Ed.), Introduction to social media investigation (pp. 221-35). Boston: Syngress.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr., 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThe Igraph Core Team. (2020). Igraph - Network analysis software. https://igraph.org/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationR Core Team. (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Int. aaai Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 2.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGraph drawing by force-directed placement - Fruchterman - 1991 - Software: practice and experience. Wiley Online Library. https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/spe.4380211102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSix, J. M., & Tollis, I. G. (2006). A framework and algorithms for circular drawings of graphs. J. Discrete Algorithms, 4(1), 25-50. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jda.2005.01.009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAarts, A. A., et al. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aac4716spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. plos one, 9(6), e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBlondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/ P10008spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChacón Vargas, J. R., & Moreno Mantilla, C. E. (2016). Organizational antecedents and capabilities for sustainable supply chain management in developing economies: the case of Colombian focal firms. Cuad. Adm., 29(53). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao29-53.oacsspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTouboulic, A., Matthews, L., & Marques, L. (2018). On the road to carbon reduction in a food supply network: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Supply Chain Manag., 23(4), 313-335. https://doi. org/10.1108/SCM-06-2017-0214spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSantamaria, F., Trujillo, C. L., & Hernandez, J. A. (2016). A proposed index to evaluate the state of legislation fostering distributed generation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Electr. J., 29(2), 66-74. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2016.02.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVillarreal, B., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2016). A lean thinking and simulation-based approach for the improvement of routing operations. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 116(5), 903-925. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IMDS-09-2015-0385spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFuchshofen, N., Hirsch, D., Brodtmann, L. I., & Terlau, W. (2018). Production, consumption and the actor’s landscape in the Argentinean organic agricultural and food sector. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn., 9(5), 419- 437. https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v9i5.954spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMascarenhas, A. O., Dias, S. L. G., & Baptista, R. M. (2015). Elements for discussion of modern slave labor as a management practice. rae Rev. Adm. Empres., 55(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034- 759020150207spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMelnyk, S. A., Flynn, B. B., & Awaysheh, A. (2018). The best of times and the worst of times: empirical operations and supply chain management research. Int. J. Prod. Res., 56(1-2), 164-192. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00207543.2017.1391423spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMatta, E. J. (2018). Pollution in the Uruguay-Argentina border: critical data analysis from two rivers and the pulp mill effluent. Int. J. Environ. Health, 9(1), 84-109. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJENVH.2018.090876spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTobar-Pesántez, L., & Solano-Gallegos, S. (2018). The importance of small and medium enterprises in the city of Cuenca-Ecuador and their contribution to the creation of employment. Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J., 22(2).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFrank, B., Enkawa, T., Schvaneveldt, S. J., & Herbas Torrico, B. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of innate willingness to pay for innovations: understanding motivations and consumer preferences of prospective early adopters. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 99, 252- 266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.029spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDakessian, L. C., & Feldmann, P. R. (2013). Multilatinas and value creation from cross-border acquisitions: an event study approach. bar - Braz. Adm. Rev., 10(4), 462-489. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807- 76922013000400006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFernando Schmidt, H. (2017). Engaging Taiwan and overcoming its protectionism: an analysis of the case of meat trade. Tamkang J. Int. Aff., 21(1), 131-194. https://doi.org/10.6185/TJIA.V.21.N1.P131P194spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCardoza, G., Fornes, G., Farber, V., Gonzalez Duarte, R., & Ruiz Gutierrez, J. (2016). Barriers and public policies affecting the international expansion of Latin American smes: evidence from Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. J. Bus. Res., 69(6), 2030-2039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2015.10.148spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCabello Eras, J. J., Sagastume Gutiérrez, A., García Lorenzo, D., Cogollos Martínez, J. B., Hens, L., & Vandecasteele, C. (2015). Bridging universities and industry through cleaner production activities. Experiences from the Cleaner Production Center at the University of Cienfuegos, Cuba. J. Clean. Prod., 108, 873-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2014.11.063spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHermans, M., et al. (2017). Attitudes towards women’s career advancement in Latin America: the moderating impact of perceived company international proactiveness. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 48(1), 90-112. https:// doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0039-7spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCárdenas, M. C., et al. (2014). Latin American female business executives: an interesting surprise. Gend. Manag., 29(1), 2-24. https://doi. org/10.1108/GM-06-2013-0067spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarrido-Vega, P., Ortega Jimenez, C. H., De los Ríos, J. L., & Morita, M. (2015). Implementation of technology and production strategy practices: relationship levels in different industries. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 161, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTirado-Estrada, G., et al. (2018). Potential impacts of dietary Lemna gibba supplements in a simulated ruminal fermentation system and environmental biogas production. J. Clean. Prod., 181, 555-561. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.120spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPérez-Pineda, F., Alcaraz, J. M., & Colón, C. (2017). Creating sustainable value in the hospitality industry: a (critical) multi-stakeholder study in the Dominican Republic. J. Sustain. Tour., 25(11), 1633-1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1297451spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoyos, N., et al. (2017). The environmental envelope of fires in the Colombian Caribbean. Appl. Geogr., 84, 42-54. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.05.001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRichter, U. H. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on csr. J. Bus. Ethics, 97(4), 625-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0529-7spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationComer, G., Larrymore, N., & Rodriguez, J. (2008). Measuring the value of active fund management: the case of hybrid mutual funds. Manag. Finance, 35(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350910922591spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOviedo-García, M. Á., Castellanos-Verdugo, M., Vega-Vázquez, M., & Orgaz-Agüera, F. (2017). The mediating roles of the overall perceived value of the ecotourism site and attitudes towards ecotourism in sustainability through the key relationship ecotourism knowledge-ecotourist satisfaction. Int. J. Tour. Res., 19(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jtr.2097spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJurburg, D., Viles, E., Jaca, C., & Tanco, M. (2015). Why are companies still struggling to reach higher continuous improvement maturity levels? Empirical evidence from high performance companies. tqm J., 27, (3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0123spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOtálora, J., Olaya, D., Borda, J., & Escobar, A. (2016). Effects of ias 32 on equity instruments: a study of Colombian cooperatives. Rev. Venez. Gerenc., 21(76), 653-672.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectInvestigación en administraciónspa
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaspa
dc.subjectmapas de cienciaspa
dc.subjectacoplamiento bibliográficospa
dc.subjectBibliometríaspa
dc.subject.ddcDe obras sobre temas específicosspa
dc.subject.ddcAdministración generalspa
dc.subject.keywordManagement researchspa
dc.subject.keywordLatin-Americaspa
dc.subject.keywordScience mappingspa
dc.subject.keywordbibliographic couplingspa
dc.subject.keywordBibliometricsspa
dc.titleAtlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 1spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleAtlas of Management Research in Latin America Vol. 1eng
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
DI-155.pdf
Tamaño:
4.64 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Escuela de Administración