Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Sustainable Production and Trade Discrimination: An Analysis of the WTO Jurisprudence

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCalle Saldarriaga, María
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T14:16:48Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T14:16:48Z
dc.date.created2018-02-26
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to examine the legality of trade measures addressing environmental conditions of production (PPMs) in the context of non-discrimination provisions under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)  and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement).  It shows that the notion of de facto discrimination is still a sensitive subject in the analysis of origin-neutral measures, including those based on environmental PPMs. Much of the discussion regarding PPMs focuses on the issue of ‘like products’. The interpretation of ‘likeness’ has also served to classify PPMs into the two categories of product related and non-product related. Such distinction rests on how the PPM affects the final product. However, it is important to analyse to what extent these measures can accord less favourable treatment to like products. The author argues that this requires a competition analysis. This article also elucidates how depending upon the applicable law (the TBT Agreement or the GATT) PPMs are likely to face different legal challenges, particularly in terms of less favourable treatment. The author also assesses the possibility of transposing concepts such as ‘legitimate regulatory distinctions’ stemming from the TBT jurisprudence into GATT cases involving PPMs, and whether there will be an additional ‘test’ for PPMs characterised as TBT measures. This article is based on an extensive literature review and doctrinal legal researcheng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/15634
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/6543/5032
dc.relation.uri10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.6543
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2018 ACDI - Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacionalspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceACDI - Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional; Vol. 11 (2018): ACDIspa
dc.sourceAnnuaire Colombien de Droit International - ACDI; Vol. 11 (2018): ACDIspa
dc.sourceColombian Yearbook of International Law - CYIL; Vol. 11 (2018): ACDIspa
dc.source2145-4493spa
dc.source2027-1131spa
dc.source10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/vol112018spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectInternational trade law and the environmentspa
dc.subjectNon-discrimination obligations under the GATT and the TBT Agreementspa
dc.subjectProcesses and production methodsspa
dc.subjectDe facto discriminationspa
dc.subjectWTO jurisprudence.spa
dc.subject.keywordInternational trade law and the environmenteng
dc.subject.keywordProcesses and production methodseng
dc.subject.keywordDe facto discriminationeng
dc.subject.keywordWTO jurisprudenceeng
dc.titleSustainable Production and Trade Discrimination: An Analysis of the WTO Jurisprudencespa
dc.titleSustainable Production and Trade Discrimination: An Analysis of the WTOspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional - ACDI