Ítem
Solo Metadatos

(Un)contested evidence: scientific literature, systematic reviews and the politics of evidence in the introduction of HPV vaccines in Colombia

dc.creatorCastañeda, Oscar J. Maldonadospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T00:01:06Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T00:01:06Z
dc.date.created2019spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the tensions between scientific literature and systematic reviews in the production of evidence in healthcare. Systematic reviews are devices developed – within evidence-based medicine – to navigate the complexities of scientific literature promising a clear and simple account of the knowledge on a particular issue. However, in practice, systematic reviews have a more complex relation with literature. Systematic reviews are shaped according to the interest of the local groups that produce them. In this paper, I explore the formatting, making and managing of systematic reviews of evidence relating to HPV vaccines in Colombia. This case shows the ways in which systematic reviews mediate between the requirement of presenting the evidence that emerges from the international literature and the necessity of having data locally relevant. © 2018 Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12808
dc.identifier.issn01419889
dc.identifier.issn14679566
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23314
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltdspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage94
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage81
dc.relation.citationTitleSociology of Health and Illness
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 41
dc.relation.ispartofSociology of Health and Illness, ISSN:01419889, 14679566, Vol.41, No.1 (2019); pp. 81-94spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052458838&doi=10.1111%2f1467-9566.12808&partnerID=40&md5=4dd9d73e65bdc2d33b0b5812e9438dc3spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordWart virus vaccinespa
dc.subject.keywordColombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordEconomicsspa
dc.subject.keywordEvidence based medicinespa
dc.subject.keywordFemalespa
dc.subject.keywordHealth care deliveryspa
dc.subject.keywordHumanspa
dc.subject.keywordOrganizationspa
dc.subject.keywordOrganization and managementspa
dc.subject.keywordPapillomavirus infectionspa
dc.subject.keywordPoliticsspa
dc.subject.keywordPublicationspa
dc.subject.keywordUterine cervix tumorspa
dc.subject.keywordColombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordDecision Makingeng
dc.subject.keywordDelivery of Health Carespa
dc.subject.keywordEvidence-Based Medicinespa
dc.subject.keywordFemalespa
dc.subject.keywordHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18spa
dc.subject.keywordHumansspa
dc.subject.keywordPapillomavirus Infectionsspa
dc.subject.keywordPapillomavirus Vaccinesspa
dc.subject.keywordPeriodicals as Topicspa
dc.subject.keywordPoliticsspa
dc.subject.keywordSystematic Reviews as Topicspa
dc.subject.keywordUterine Cervical Neoplasmsspa
dc.subject.keywordEvidencespa
dc.subject.keywordHPV vaccinespa
dc.subject.keywordSystematic reviewsspa
dc.title(Un)contested evidence: scientific literature, systematic reviews and the politics of evidence in the introduction of HPV vaccines in Colombiaspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones