Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study

dc.creatorBoldini, Angelaspa
dc.creatorBeato, Maria Soledadspa
dc.creatorCadavid Espinha, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T14:46:01Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T14:46:01Z
dc.date.created2013-02-13spa
dc.description.abstractIn the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) studies have searched for possible overlapping in brain electrical activity between true and false memory. Using the DRM paradigm, the present experiment manipulated the sensory modality of stimulus presentation (auditory vs. visual) in the study phase to analyse the effect of modality match between study and test on true and false recognition. Words were therefore presented either visually or auditorily at study and always visually at test. True recognition was found to be significantly higher in the modality ‘match’ condition (visual–visual) than in the ‘mismatch’ condition (auditory–visual), whereas there was no modality-match effect on false recognition of critical lures. A general, overlapping was found between ERP correlates of true and false recognition: FN400 (300–500 ms), left-parietal (400–800 ms) and late right-frontal (1000–1500 ms) old/new effects were similar for both studied words and critical lures. No sensory modality-match effect was associated with FN400 or left-parietal old/new effects. Only the late right-frontal activity was modulated by modality manipulation, with significantly more positive ERPs in the modality-match condition. Sensory modality match of stimulus presentation, therefore, dissociated true and false recognition memory only at the behavioural level but not at the ERP level. Overall, true and false recognition memories seem to share common underlying processes.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0959-4965
dc.identifier.issnEISSN: 1473-558X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage113
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 3
dc.relation.citationStartPage108
dc.relation.citationTitleNeuroReport
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 24
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroReport, ISSN: 0959-4965;EISSN: 1473-558X, Vol.24, No.3 (February 2013); pp. 108-113spa
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2013/02130/Modality_match_effect_in_false_recognition___an.2.aspxspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.accesoRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)spa
dc.sourceNeuroReportspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keywordDRM paradigmspa
dc.subject.keywordEvent-related potentialsspa
dc.subject.keywordFalse recognitionspa
dc.subject.keywordMemory illusionspa
dc.subject.keywordModality-match effectspa
dc.titleModality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential studyspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleEfecto de coincidencia de modalidad en el reconocimiento falso: un estudio potencial relacionado con un eventospa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones