Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Response to Tibayrenc and Ayala: Reproductive clonality in protozoan pathogens - Truth or artefact?

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorRamírez, Juan Davidspa
dc.creatorLlewellyn, M. S.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T23:57:08Z
dc.date.available2020-05-25T23:57:08Z
dc.date.created2015spa
dc.description.abstractTibayrenc and Ayala raised several interesting objections to an opinion piece we recently published in Molecular Ecology (Ramirez and Llewellyn 2014). Our piece examined the value of an alternative perspective to their theory of predominant clonal evolution (PCE) on the prevalence and importance of genetic exchange in parasitic protozoa. In particular, our aim was to establish whether population genetic signatures of clonality in parasites were representative of true biological/evolutionary processes or artefacts of inadequate tools and inappropriate or inadequate sampling. We address Tibayrenc and Ayala's criticisms and make a detailed response. In doing so, we deny the consensus that Tibayrenc and Ayala claim around their views and dismiss much of the language which Tibayrenc and Ayala have introduced to this debate as either arbitrary or inaccurate. We strongly reject accusations that we misunderstood and misquoted the work of others. We do not think the PCE provides a useful framework for understanding existing parasite population structures. Furthermore, on the eve of the population genomic era, we strongly urge Tibayrenc and Ayala to wait for the forthcoming wealth of high-resolution data before considering whether it is appropriate to refine or re-iterate their PCE hypothesis. © 2015 John Wiley and Sons Ltd.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13442
dc.identifier.issn1365294X
dc.identifier.issn09621083
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22614
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltdspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage5784
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 23
dc.relation.citationStartPage5782
dc.relation.citationTitleMolecular Ecology
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 24
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology, ISSN:1365294X, 09621083, Vol.24, No.23 (2015); pp. 5782-5784spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84948392396&doi=10.1111%2fmec.13442&partnerID=40&md5=99e369d3b79b383fce11f9ea752b9184spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordClonal evolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordEvolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordGenetic variationspa
dc.subject.keywordGiardiaspa
dc.subject.keywordPhysiologyspa
dc.subject.keywordToxoplasmaspa
dc.subject.keywordBiological evolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordClonal evolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordGenetic variationspa
dc.subject.keywordGiardiaspa
dc.subject.keywordToxoplasmaspa
dc.subject.keywordContemporary evolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordDisease biologyspa
dc.subject.keywordEvolution of sexspa
dc.subject.keywordParasitologyspa
dc.titleResponse to Tibayrenc and Ayala: Reproductive clonality in protozoan pathogens - Truth or artefact?spa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos