Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Developing Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students - A Scoping Review

dc.creatorTelleus, Patrik
dc.creatorHenderson, Janine
dc.creatorYaya, Carlos
dc.creatorVergel Guerrero, John Alexander
dc.creatorGarzón Luna, Daniel
dc.creatorStentoft, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T20:40:46Z
dc.date.available2020-04-28T20:40:46Z
dc.date.created2020-04-28
dc.descriptionEl razonamiento clínico es, quizás, la competencia más importante del trabajo de los médicos, o al menos un aspecto fundamental de la práctica médica; por lo tanto, la enseñanza del razonamiento clínico debe estar en el núcleo de los planes de estudios médicos. Aunque el desarrollo de las habilidades de razonamiento clínico de los estudiantes es un viaje interesante, los educadores médicos también pueden considerar este viaje tan largo y frustrante porque, aparentemente, no hay "soluciones rápidas" para enseñarlo. Conscientes de la necesidad de tener una visión general de ese tema, que puede ayudar a guiar las consultas específicas de los docentes clínicos para transformar su práctica educativa, realizamos una revisión de alcance para examinar la naturaleza, las brechas y el alcance de la investigación en este campo.spa
dc.description.abstractClinical reasoning is, perhaps, the most important competence of the physicians’ job, or at least a fundamental aspect of medical practice; thus, teaching clinical reasoning must be in the core of medical curricula. Although developing students’ clinical reasoning skills is an interesting journey, medical educators might also consider this journey as long and frustrating because, apparently, there are no ‘quick fixes’ to teach clinical reasoning. Aware of the need to have an overview of that issue, which may help to guide the specific queries of clinical teachers in order to transform their educational practice, we conducted a scoping review examining the nature, gaps, and extent of research in this field.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12804/issne.2500-6428_10336.21803_emcs
dc.identifier.issn2500-6428
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/21803
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 26
dc.relation.citationTitleDocumento de investigación
dc.relation.ispartofDocumento de investigación, ISSNe 2500-6428 Número 26 , (Marzo 2020); pp. 24spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDumas D, Torre DM, Durning SJ. Using relational reasoning strategies to help improve clinical reasoning practice. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):709-14.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClark BW, Derakhshan A, Desai SV. Diagnostic errors and the bedside clinical examination. Medical Clin North Am. 2018;102(3):453-64.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcBee E, Ratcliffe T, Schuwirth L, O’Neill D, Meyer H, Madden SJ, et al. Context and clinical reasoning: Understanding the medical student perspective. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(4):256-63.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHege I, Kononowicz AA, Berman NB, Lenzer B, Kiesewetter J. Advancing clinical reasoning in virtual patients - development and application of a conceptual framework. GMS J Med Educ. 2018;35(1):Doc12.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNayer M, Glover Takahashi S, Hrynchak P. Twelve tips for developing keyfeature questions (kfq) for effective assessment of clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2018:1-7.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYoung M, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Ballard T, Gordon D, Gruppen LD, et al. Drawing Boundaries: The Difficulty in Defining Clinical Reasoning. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):990-5.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTrowbridge RL, Olson APJ. Becoming a teacher of clinical reasoning. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018;5(1):11-4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNendaz MR, Raetzo MA, Junod AF, Vu NV. Teaching diagnostic skills: Clinical Vignettes or chief complaints? Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2000;5(1):3-10.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPinnock R, Anakin M, Lawrence J, Chignell H, Wilkinson T. Identifying developmental features in students’ clinical reasoning to inform teaching. Med Teacher. 2018:1-6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPeixoto JM, Santos SME, Faria R. Clinical reasoning development in medical students. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2018;42(1):75-83.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchmidt HG, Mamede S. How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: a narrative review and a proposal. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):961-73.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMenezes SS, Correa CG, Silva Rde C, Cruz Dde A. Clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review. Rev Esc Enferm usp. 2015;49(6):1037-44.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerisier S, Larue C, Boyer L. How does questioning influence nursing students’ clinical reasoning in problem-based learning? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:108-15.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLevac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVergel J, Stentoft D, Montoya J. Extending the theoretical framework for curriculum integration in pre-clinical medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Aug;6(4):246-255.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMonteiro SM, Norman G. Diagnostic reasoning: where we’ve been, where we’re going. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S26-32.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLubarsky S, Dory V, Audetat MC, Custers E, Charlin B. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(2):e61-70.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationViolato C, Gao H, O’Brien MC, Grier D, Shen E. How do physicians become medical experts? A test of three competing theories: distinct domains, independent influence and encapsulation models. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(2):249-63.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYazdani S, Hosseinzadeh M, Hosseini F. Models of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: A critical review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017;5(4):177-84.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. J Hosp Med. 2019; 14 (7): 416-8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHanneke R, Asada Y. The Scoping Review Method: Mapping the literature in “Structural Change” Public Health Interventions. SAGE Research Methods Cases. 2017: 1-14.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHaig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no 3: systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 1: Sources of information. Med teach. 2003;25(4):352-63.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAl Rumayyan A, Ahmed N, Al Subait R, Al Ghamdi G, Mohammed Mahzari M, Awad Mohamed T, et al. Teaching clinical reasoning through hypotheticodeduction is (slightly) better than self-explanation in tutorial groups: An experimental study. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):93-9.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectRazonamiento clínicospa
dc.subjectEnseñanzaspa
dc.subjectPráctica médicaspa
dc.subjectEducadores médicosspa
dc.subject.ddcEducación superiorspa
dc.subject.ddcCiencias médicas, Medicinaspa
dc.subject.keywordClinical reasoningspa
dc.subject.keywordTeachingspa
dc.subject.keywordMedical practicespa
dc.subject.keywordMedical educatorsspa
dc.subject.lembMedicina clínica - Toma de decisiones - Metodologíaspa
dc.subject.lembMedicina - Razonamientospa
dc.subject.lembCompetencia clínicaspa
dc.subject.lembMedicina - Estudio y Enseñanzaspa
dc.titleDeveloping Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students - A Scoping Reviewspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleDesarrollo del razonamiento clínico en estudiantes de medicina: una revisión de alcancespa
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
DI 26 MedSa.pdf
Tamaño:
614.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: