Ítem
Acceso Abierto
Developing Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students - A Scoping Review
| dc.creator | Telleus, Patrik | |
| dc.creator | Henderson, Janine | |
| dc.creator | Yaya, Carlos | |
| dc.creator | Vergel Guerrero, John Alexander | |
| dc.creator | Garzón Luna, Daniel | |
| dc.creator | Stentoft, Diana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-28T20:40:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-28T20:40:46Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2020-04-28 | |
| dc.description | El razonamiento clínico es, quizás, la competencia más importante del trabajo de los médicos, o al menos un aspecto fundamental de la práctica médica; por lo tanto, la enseñanza del razonamiento clínico debe estar en el núcleo de los planes de estudios médicos. Aunque el desarrollo de las habilidades de razonamiento clínico de los estudiantes es un viaje interesante, los educadores médicos también pueden considerar este viaje tan largo y frustrante porque, aparentemente, no hay "soluciones rápidas" para enseñarlo. Conscientes de la necesidad de tener una visión general de ese tema, que puede ayudar a guiar las consultas específicas de los docentes clínicos para transformar su práctica educativa, realizamos una revisión de alcance para examinar la naturaleza, las brechas y el alcance de la investigación en este campo. | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | Clinical reasoning is, perhaps, the most important competence of the physicians’ job, or at least a fundamental aspect of medical practice; thus, teaching clinical reasoning must be in the core of medical curricula. Although developing students’ clinical reasoning skills is an interesting journey, medical educators might also consider this journey as long and frustrating because, apparently, there are no ‘quick fixes’ to teach clinical reasoning. Aware of the need to have an overview of that issue, which may help to guide the specific queries of clinical teachers in order to transform their educational practice, we conducted a scoping review examining the nature, gaps, and extent of research in this field. | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.format.tipo | Documento | spa |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.12804/issne.2500-6428_10336.21803_emcs | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2500-6428 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/21803 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad del Rosario | spa |
| dc.relation.citationIssue | No. 26 | |
| dc.relation.citationTitle | Documento de investigación | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Documento de investigación, ISSNe 2500-6428 Número 26 , (Marzo 2020); pp. 24 | spa |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia | spa |
| dc.rights.accesRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.acceso | Abierto (Texto Completo) | spa |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ | |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Dumas D, Torre DM, Durning SJ. Using relational reasoning strategies to help improve clinical reasoning practice. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):709-14. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Clark BW, Derakhshan A, Desai SV. Diagnostic errors and the bedside clinical examination. Medical Clin North Am. 2018;102(3):453-64. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | McBee E, Ratcliffe T, Schuwirth L, O’Neill D, Meyer H, Madden SJ, et al. Context and clinical reasoning: Understanding the medical student perspective. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(4):256-63. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Hege I, Kononowicz AA, Berman NB, Lenzer B, Kiesewetter J. Advancing clinical reasoning in virtual patients - development and application of a conceptual framework. GMS J Med Educ. 2018;35(1):Doc12. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Nayer M, Glover Takahashi S, Hrynchak P. Twelve tips for developing keyfeature questions (kfq) for effective assessment of clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2018:1-7. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Young M, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Ballard T, Gordon D, Gruppen LD, et al. Drawing Boundaries: The Difficulty in Defining Clinical Reasoning. Acad Med. 2018;93(7):990-5. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Trowbridge RL, Olson APJ. Becoming a teacher of clinical reasoning. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018;5(1):11-4. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Nendaz MR, Raetzo MA, Junod AF, Vu NV. Teaching diagnostic skills: Clinical Vignettes or chief complaints? Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2000;5(1):3-10. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Pinnock R, Anakin M, Lawrence J, Chignell H, Wilkinson T. Identifying developmental features in students’ clinical reasoning to inform teaching. Med Teacher. 2018:1-6. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Peixoto JM, Santos SME, Faria R. Clinical reasoning development in medical students. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2018;42(1):75-83. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Schmidt HG, Mamede S. How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: a narrative review and a proposal. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):961-73. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Menezes SS, Correa CG, Silva Rde C, Cruz Dde A. Clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review. Rev Esc Enferm usp. 2015;49(6):1037-44. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Merisier S, Larue C, Boyer L. How does questioning influence nursing students’ clinical reasoning in problem-based learning? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:108-15. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Vergel J, Stentoft D, Montoya J. Extending the theoretical framework for curriculum integration in pre-clinical medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Aug;6(4):246-255. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Monteiro SM, Norman G. Diagnostic reasoning: where we’ve been, where we’re going. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S26-32. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audetat MC, Custers E, Charlin B. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(2):e61-70. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Violato C, Gao H, O’Brien MC, Grier D, Shen E. How do physicians become medical experts? A test of three competing theories: distinct domains, independent influence and encapsulation models. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(2):249-63. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Yazdani S, Hosseinzadeh M, Hosseini F. Models of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: A critical review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017;5(4):177-84. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. J Hosp Med. 2019; 14 (7): 416-8. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Hanneke R, Asada Y. The Scoping Review Method: Mapping the literature in “Structural Change” Public Health Interventions. SAGE Research Methods Cases. 2017: 1-14. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no 3: systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 1: Sources of information. Med teach. 2003;25(4):352-63. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. | spa |
| dc.source.bibliographicCitation | Al Rumayyan A, Ahmed N, Al Subait R, Al Ghamdi G, Mohammed Mahzari M, Awad Mohamed T, et al. Teaching clinical reasoning through hypotheticodeduction is (slightly) better than self-explanation in tutorial groups: An experimental study. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):93-9. | spa |
| dc.source.instname | instname:Universidad del Rosario | spa |
| dc.source.reponame | reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR | spa |
| dc.subject | Razonamiento clínico | spa |
| dc.subject | Enseñanza | spa |
| dc.subject | Práctica médica | spa |
| dc.subject | Educadores médicos | spa |
| dc.subject.ddc | Educación superior | spa |
| dc.subject.ddc | Ciencias médicas, Medicina | spa |
| dc.subject.keyword | Clinical reasoning | spa |
| dc.subject.keyword | Teaching | spa |
| dc.subject.keyword | Medical practice | spa |
| dc.subject.keyword | Medical educators | spa |
| dc.subject.lemb | Medicina clínica - Toma de decisiones - Metodología | spa |
| dc.subject.lemb | Medicina - Razonamiento | spa |
| dc.subject.lemb | Competencia clínica | spa |
| dc.subject.lemb | Medicina - Estudio y Enseñanza | spa |
| dc.title | Developing Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students - A Scoping Review | spa |
| dc.title.TranslatedTitle | Desarrollo del razonamiento clínico en estudiantes de medicina: una revisión de alcance | spa |
| dc.type | workingPaper | eng |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type.spa | Documento de trabajo | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- DI 26 MedSa.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 614.68 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:



