Ítem
Solo Metadatos

The ironic effect of deliberation: what we can (and cannot) expect in deeply divided societies

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorUgarriza Uribe, Juan Estebanspa
dc.creatorTrujillo-Orrego, Nataliaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T00:03:07Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T00:03:07Z
dc.date.created2020spa
dc.description.abstractOne of the foundational promises of deliberation in contemporary democracies was the transformation of citizen’s preferences by the force of the better arguments. However, deliberation has proved so far to be ineffective to promote intergroup changes for the better in terms of attitudes. As a result, evidence shows that even discussions lying relatively close to the theoretical ideal might nevertheless push changes in either a positive or a negative direction. We argue that deliberation lacks the necessary built-in mechanisms for constraining polarization and unleashing desired changes, particularly in deeply divided societies. Thus, efforts aimed at bridging the divides between adversarial groups require the promotion of specific, empathy-generating discursive contents, which even highly deliberative debate cannot ensure. Based on two experimental studies, we show how deliberation and intergroup reconciliation operate through different mechanisms. While there is no reason to believe they are incompatible, it remains to be seen how they can be set in motion simultaneously. © 2018, Springer Nature Limited.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0113-1
dc.identifier.issn16810
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23563
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage241
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage221
dc.relation.citationTitleActa Politica
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 55
dc.relation.ispartofActa Politica, ISSN:16810, Vol.55, No.2 (2020); pp. 221-241spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052512978&doi=10.1057%2fs41269-018-0113-1&partnerID=40&md5=e094609b44584f489d3334786c214b16spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordConflictspa
dc.subject.keywordDeliberationspa
dc.subject.keywordDemocracyspa
dc.subject.keywordDivided societiesspa
dc.subject.keywordExperimentsspa
dc.subject.keywordPostconflictspa
dc.subject.keywordReconciliationspa
dc.titleThe ironic effect of deliberation: what we can (and cannot) expect in deeply divided societiesspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos