Ítem
Solo Metadatos

How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCruz A.M.spa
dc.creatorTorres D.A.Q.spa
dc.creatorPresiga A.M.spa
dc.creatorLuna N.F.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T00:10:47Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T00:10:47Z
dc.date.created2017spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to measure what are the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after finishing their clinical engineering major courses. This is a pre- post-test with no control group study design. Forty students were involved in this pilot study. A paper-based survey composed of a demographic section and a 5-point Likert (“1” is strongly disagree and “5” is strongly agree) section measured the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses. A Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U test statistics were conducted to test the two hypotheses of this study. Our analysis showed statistically significant results between the pre-survey mean and SD: 21.10 SD 3.54; and between the postsurvey mean and SD: 22.75 SD 3.68 (Z=-2.12, p less than 0.033), indicating that overall, students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses had significantly improved by the end of the major. Also, statistically significant results were found between the post-survey mean and SD: 3.94 SD 0.61 learning outcome perceptions and between the students’ actual marks mean and SD: 4.53 SD 0.22 (-5.00, p less than 0.000), indicating the students had low confidence in their learning outcomes after completing their clinical engineering major. © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_6
dc.identifier.issn2006
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24258
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage25
dc.relation.citationStartPage22
dc.relation.citationTitleIFMBE Proceedings
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 60
dc.relation.ispartofIFMBE Proceedings, ISSN:2006, Vol.60,(2017); pp. 22-25spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018427839&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-10-4086-3_6&partnerID=40&md5=249c9b41fe4b510cd479bc8e75dc67a4spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordBiomedical engineeringspa
dc.subject.keywordBiophysicsspa
dc.subject.keywordEducationspa
dc.subject.keywordStatistical testsspa
dc.subject.keywordStudentsspa
dc.subject.keywordSurveysspa
dc.subject.keywordClinical engineeringspa
dc.subject.keywordControl groupsspa
dc.subject.keywordLearning outcomespa
dc.subject.keywordMann-Whitney U testspa
dc.subject.keywordPerceived learning outcomesspa
dc.subject.keywordPilot studiesspa
dc.subject.keywordPost testspa
dc.subject.keywordSigned rankspa
dc.subject.keywordEngineering educationspa
dc.subject.keywordBiomedical engineeringspa
dc.subject.keywordClinical engineeringspa
dc.subject.keywordEngineering educationspa
dc.titleHow do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot studyspa
dc.typeconferenceObjecteng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de conferenciaspa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos