Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Are competitiveness rankings and institutional measures helping emerging economies to improve?

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorBuitrago Rubiano, Ricardo Ernestospa
dc.creatorTorralba Barreto, Daniel Ricardospa
dc.creatorReyes Ortíz, Giovanni Efrain spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T18:20:11Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T18:20:11Z
dc.date.created2023-08-03spa
dc.date.issued2023spa
dc.descriptionPurpose – Based on the rankings of the global competitiveness index and the fragile states index, this paper aims to suggest alternative approaches to shed some light on the effectiveness of rankings in helping emerging economies improve their competitiveness from an institutional standpoint. Design/methodology/approach – The statistical analysis consisted of a two-stage analysis; the first stage consisted of constructing an updated Alternative Institutional Quality Index (AIQI), intending to design a comparative measure between dimensions over time. The second stage consisted of evidencing the structure of each of the observed dimensions’ variance to evidence the existing changes or gaps of the AIQI and its components. The authors incorporated the Kruskas–Wallis (KW) model to test the results. Findings – This paper demonstrates that the analyzed countries generally maintain their competitive position, even though changes in their scores are reflected. This makes invisible the development and progress factors generated by the countries that are mainly found with low scores and only reflect stable structures that allow them to maintain their position. Research limitations/implications – The current study has a limitation because it concentrated on a few selected indicators based on the literature review. The limitations of this research may be overlooked in the future by adding additional variables and observations. The paper could be improved by including intraand inter-regional approaches to control based on the occurrence of specific circumstances (i.e. informal institutions, economic development or factor endowments). Practical implications – The paper contributes to the applicable measurement of competitiveness and its structural change over time. Originality/value – This paper proposed an alternative and simple methodology to assess the evolution of the competitiveness indicators; this methodology could be used to measure structural changes at different levels, which may be an input for the design and implementation of policies to foster competitiveness.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/CR-04-2021-0064spa
dc.identifier.issn1059-5422spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/42094
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CR-04-2021-0064/full/htmlspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourceCompetitiveness Reviewspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectCompetitivenessspa
dc.subjectInstitutionsspa
dc.subjectInstitutional qualityspa
dc.subjectEmerging economiesspa
dc.titleAre competitiveness rankings and institutional measures helping emerging economies to improve?spa
dc.typearticlespa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Are competitiveness rankings.pdf
Tamaño:
550.89 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos