Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Desenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia

dc.contributorGarnica Sepúlveda, Diego Eduardo
dc.contributorNavarro-Navajas, Alberto
dc.contributorVásquez, Juan Felipe
dc.contributorIdrovo Turbay, Carolina Paola
dc.contributorBonnett, Angélica
dc.contributorCarreño, Marisol
dc.contributor.advisorIsaza-Restrepo, Daniel
dc.contributor.advisorCárdenas-Roldán, Jorge
dc.creatorTorralba, Felipe
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Cardiologíaspa
dc.creator.degreeLevelMaestría
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-06T23:29:02Z
dc.date.available2021-08-06T23:29:02Z
dc.date.created2021-07-28
dc.descriptionLa disminución de la natalidad global y el aumento de la expectativa de vida ha ocasionado una inversión de la pirámide poblacional, con una población de adultos mayores de 80 años que se encuentra en constante crecimiento. En este trabajo se describe los desenlaces intrahospitalarios cardiovasculares de los pacientes mayores de 80 años con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del ST (IAMSEST), que ingresaron a la Fundación Cardio Infantil entre 2018 y 2020. Se describe las características demográficas y clínicas, y se identifica las enfermedades y factores de riesgo más prevalentes en esta población y se comparan estos datos con los de la población de pacientes menores de esta edad. Este es un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, observacional, con un cálculo de muestra no probabilístico por conveniencia. Los octogenarios son pacientes más comórbidos en comparación con los de menor edad, siendo concordante con lo reportado en la literatura, pero que para algunas patologías tuvo mayor magnitud propio de la distribución geográfica local. Hubo mayor prevalencia de bloqueo AV, falla cardiaca descompensada y fibrilación auricular aguda en el grupo de octogenarios, hallazgos de gran impacto pronóstico a largo plazo. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria, el choque cardiogénico y las arritmias ventriculares tuvieron una prevalencia similar, siendo estos, hallazgos no esperados, pero que se pueden explicar por el seguimiento intrahospitalario y la falta de registro a mediano plazo. Se trata del primer trabajo de desenlaces intrahospitalarios de pacientes colombianos mayores de 80 años con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST.spa
dc.description.abstractThe decline in the global birth rate and the increase in life expectancy have led to a reversal of the population pyramid, showing a constantly growing population of adults over 80. This paper describes the cardiovascular in-hospital outcomes of patients older than 80 years with a diagnosis of NSTEMI, who were admitted to Fundación Cardioinfantil between 2018 and 2020. We describe demographic and clinical characteristics of this population, and also, the most prevalent diseases and risk factors, to be compared with those of the population of patients younger than this age It is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study with a non-probabilistic sample calculation for convenience. Octogenarians are more comorbid patients compared to younger ones, being consistent with what is reported in the literature. There was a higher prevalence of AV block, decompensated heart failure, and acute atrial fibrillation in the octogenarian group, findings with a high long-term prognostic impact. In-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular arrhythmias had a similar prevalence, being an unexpected finding, which can be explained by the shot in-hospital follow-up and the lack of a mid-term registry. This is the first in-hospital outcomes study of Colombian patients older than 80 years with NSTEMI.spa
dc.format.extent47 pp.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.geoLocationBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32172
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32172
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Cardiología
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD et al. Consenso ESC 2018 sobre la cuarta definición universal del infarto de miocardio. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019;72 (1): 72. e1-e27.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation2. Stone PH, Thompson B, Anderson HV, et al. Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non -Q-wave myocardial infarction: the TIMI III registry. JAMA. 1996; 275 (14): 1104-1112spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation3. Nawar EW, Niska RW, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2007 (386): 1-32.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation4. Gallardo-Solarte K, Acosta FPB, Jiménez RR. Costos de la enfermedad crónica no transmisible: la realidad colombiana. Rev Cienc Salud. 2016; 14 (1): 103-14.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation5. Observatorio Nacional de Salud. Quinto Informe ONS: carga de enfermedad por enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles y discapacidad en Colombia. Colombia: ONS; 2015.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation6. Observatorio de la Seguridad Social. Grupo de Economía de la Salud GES. Evaluación económica en salud: tópicos teóricos y aplicaciones en Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia. 2006;5 (14): 1-16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation7. Roberts RR, Zalenski RJ, Mensah EK, Rydman RJ, Ciavarella G, Gussow L, et al. Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997; 278 (20): 1670-6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation8. Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35 (5): 449-61spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation9. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions:results in 7,472 very elderly patients. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 723-30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation10. Dangas GD, Singh HS. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients: navigate with caution. Heart 2010; 96: 813-4spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation11. Barón A. Cardiogeriatría: un reto para el siglo XXI. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2019; 26 (6): 305 - 307spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation12. Kumar s, et al. Contemporary Revascularization Dilemmas in Older Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9: e014477spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation13. Fanaroff AC, Rymer JA, Goldstein SA, Simel DL, Newby LK. Does This Patient with Chest Pain Have Acute Coronary Syndrome? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015; 314 (18): 1955-65.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation14. Collet M, et al. Guía ESC 2020 sobre el tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST. European Heart Journal. 2020. 00, 1 - 79.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation15. Qiu H, Zhu Y, Sun Z, et al. Short communication: vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness as a mechanism for increased aortic stiffness with aging. Circ Res. 2010; 107:615 - 619.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation17. Cheitlin MD. Cardiovascular Physiology - Changes with aging. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003; 12:9- 13.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation18. Mari D, et al. Hypercoagulability in centenarians: The paradox of successful aging. Blood. 1995; 86(11): 3144 - 3149spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation19. Zahavi J, et al. Enhanced in vivo platelet release reaction in old healthy individuals. Thrombosis Research. 1980; 17: 329 - 336spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation20. Ricci B, Cenko E, Vasiljevic Z. Impact of the age of frailty on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(suppl 11):30752–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation21. Parnell ST, Smith AT. Acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians: Expect the unexpected. J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):e27-e30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation22. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004; 126: 461–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation23. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1144–7.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation24. Pfisterer M, et al. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2001; 358 (9286): 951 - 957.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation25. Schampaert E, Serruys P, Kappetein AP, et al. TCT-78 outcomes of left main revascularization in the elderly and younger patients: the EXCEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: B34spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation26. McKellar SH, et al. Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5 (11): 738 - 746.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation27. Ghali WA, Knutson ML. Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. On behalf of the APPROACH investigators. Can J Cardiol. 2000; 16 (10): 1225-30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation28. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105: 2378-84.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation29. Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, Endresen K, Smith P, Aakhus S, et al.; After Eighty study investigators. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10023): 1057–65spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation30. Kolte D, Khera S, Palaniswamy C, et al. Early invasive versus initial conservative treatment strategies in octogenarians with UA/NSTEMI. Am J Med. 2013 Dec; 126(12): 1076–83.e1.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation31. Kvakkstad KM, Gran JM, Eritsland J, et al. Long-Term Survival after Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Elderly Patients with non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cardiology 2019; 144: 79–89spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation32. Bauer T, Koeth O, Jünger C, et al. Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry (ACOS) Investigators. Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(23): 2873–8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation33. Kaura A, et al. Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10251): 623 – 634.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation34. Devlin G, Gore JM, Elliott J, et al.; GRACE Investigators. Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(10): 1275–82.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation35. Kurlansky P. Do octogenarians benefit from coronary artery bypass surgery: a question with a rapidly changing answer? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012; 27: 611 - 619spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation36. Nicolini F, et al. The Impact of Age on Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Long-Term Results of a Real-World Registry. Biomed Res Int. 2017. 2017: 9829487.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation37. Lemaire A, et al. The impact of age on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 15: 158 - 166.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation38. Díez-Villanueva P, et al. Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol 2020; 17: 9 -15spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation39. Bawamia B, et al. Risk scores in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 441–450.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation40. Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Lorente V, et al. Efficacy of bleeding risk scores in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Rev Esp Card 2014; 67: 463–470.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation41. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017; 389: 1025–1034.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation42. Kochar A, et al. Long-Term Mortality of Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated in US Clinical Practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7: e007230. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007230spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation43. Batchelor WB, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36 (3): 723–30spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation44. Gabet A, et al. Early and late case fatality after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome in France, 2010-2015. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 112 (12): 754-764.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation45. Jaguszewski M, et al. Acute coronary syndromes in octogenarians referred for invasive evaluation: treatment profile and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015; 104 (1): 51- 58.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation46. Rubinstein R, et al. Trends in management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome in women ≥80 years versus those <80 years in Israel from 2000-2016. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 281: 22-27.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation47. Ardila Arenas CH, et al. Informe comité nacional de expertos para la evaluación del censo nacional de población y vivienda de Colombia - 2018. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018/informacion-tecnicaspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation48. Li S, Barywani SB, Fu ML. Relationship between physical inactivity and long-term outcome in patients aged >80 years with acute coronary syndrome.pdf. Curr Med Sci. 2018;38(2):64–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation50. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.025spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation50. Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, Prati G, Spedicato L, Nucifora G, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;249: 112–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.025spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation51. Vicent L, Ariza-Solé A, DÍez-Villanueva P, Alegre O, Sanchís J, López-Palop R, et al. Statin Treatment and Prognosis of Elderly Patients Discharged after Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cardiol. 2019;143(1):14–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation52. Kea B, Manning V, Alligood T, Raitt M. A Review of the Relationship of Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2016;4(3):107–18.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation53. McManus DD, Huang W, Domakonda K V., Ward J, Saczysnki JS, Gore JM, et al. Trends in atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Med [Internet]. 2012;125(11):1076–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.024spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation54. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Luca L, Rubboli A, Bolognese L, Gonzini L, Urbinati S, Murrone A, et al. Antithrombotic management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: A prospective, observational, nationwide study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):1–8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation56. Pokorney SD, Radder C, Schulte PJ, et al. High-degree atrioventricular block, asystole, and electro-mechanical dissociation complicating non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2015;171:25-32spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation57. Aplin M, Engstrom T, Vejlstrup NG, et al. Prognostic importance of complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:853-6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArchbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, et al. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19: 893-8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation59. Hreybe H, Saba S. Location of acute myocardial infarction and associated arrhythmias and outcome. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32: 274-7.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation60. Lamas GA, Muller JE, Turi ZG, et al. A simplified method to predict occurrence of complete heart block during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 1213-9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation61. Rathore SS, Gersh BJ, Berger PB, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart block in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes.Am Heart J 2001;141:47-54.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation62. Kleemann T, Juenger C, Kai Gitt A, et al. Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 256-61.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation63. Wang J, Luo H, Kong C, et al. (2018) Prognostic value of new-onset right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lau D, ed. Peer J 6: e4497.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation64. Xiang Lm Zhong A, You T, et al. Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2016; 22: 998–1004.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation65. Kalarus Z, Svendsen JH, Capodanno D, Dan GA, De Maria E, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: An European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA). Europace. 2019;21(10):1603A-1604P.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation66. Anderson ML, Peterson ED, Peng SA, et al. Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6: 708–715.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation67. Acharya D. Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Cardiology in Review. 2018; 26: 255–266spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation68. Kapur NK, Thayer KL, Zweck E. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020;16(1):16–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation69. Bowen RES, Graetz TJ, Emmert DA, Avidan MS. Statistics of heart failure and mechanical circulatory support in 2020. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(13):827–827.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation70. Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, Cornwell WK, Copeland H, Takeda K, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2020 Annual Report. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet]. 2021;111(3):778–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation71. Jurmann MJ, Weng Y, Drews T, Pasic M, Hennig E, Hetzer R. Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2004;25(4):610–8.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation72. Rodríguez Padial L, et al. Differences in in-hospital mortality after STEMI versus NSTEMI by sex. Eleven-year trend in the Spanish National Health Service. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020; S1885-5857(20): 30187-0.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation73. Movahed MR, et al. NSTEMI mortality trends in the US. Clin. Cardiol. 2011; 34 (11), 689–692.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation74. Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006; 333: 1091–1094.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitation75. García Castillo A, et al. RENASICA II - Registro Mexicano de Síndromes Coronarios Agudos. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005; 75: S6-S19spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectIAMSEST (infarto agudo de miocardio sin elevación del segmento ST)spa
dc.subjectAnálisis de desenlaces clínicos de adultos mayores con cardiopatíasspa
dc.subjectDescripción de MACE (Evento adverso cardiovascular mayor) en una corte de pacientes octogenarios en Bogotáspa
dc.subjectAnálisis de mortalidad por cardiopatías en población de pacientes mayores de 80 años en Bogotáspa
dc.subject.ddcEnfermedadesspa
dc.subject.keywordNSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)spa
dc.subject.keywordAnalysis of clinical outcomes in older adults with heart diseasespa
dc.subject.keywordDescription of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event) in a court of octogenarian patients in Bogotáspa
dc.subject.keywordAnalysis of mortality due to heart disease in a population of patients over 80 years of age in Bogotáspa
dc.titleDesenlaces intrahospitalarios en octogenarios con IAMSEST en un hospital cardiovascular de referencia en Bogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleIn-hospital outcomes in octogenarians with NSTEMI in a specialized cardiovascular hospital in Bogota, Colombiaspa
dc.typebachelorThesiseng
dc.type.documentDescriptivo observacional retrospectivospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
local.department.reportEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Saludspa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
DESENLACES OCTOGENARIOS IAMSEST - DR TORRALBA - REPOSITORIO.pdf
Tamaño:
439.41 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
DOCUMENTO FINAL