Ítem
Acceso Abierto

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Documents in Business, Management and Accounting in Ibero-America

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T18:15:31Z
dc.date.available2018-05-28T18:15:31Z
dc.date.created2018-05-25
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionLa investigación en negocios, administración y contabilidad (NAC) en el último siglo ha sido considerable. En medio de este océano intelectual, radicalmente perturbado por la tormenta digital, los métodos bibliométricos son cruciales para identificar autores líderes y temas de investigación emergentes, y calcular el impacto de la investigación. A pesar de su relevancia, regiones como Iberoamérica han sido pasadas por alto en estudios globales. En consecuencia, desarrollamos un análisis bibliométrico de los diez documentos más citados en NAC en cada país de Iberoamérica desde 1996 hasta 2017, haciendo uso de la base de datos de citaciones Scopus. Consideramos 19 variables para desarrollar el análisis bibliométrico. Los principales hallazgos fueron: 1) un rápido incremento en la producción de documentos, 2) España y Portugal dominan ambos campos tanto de citaciones como de producción de documentos, 3) el inglés es la lingua franca, 4) la mayoría de documentos más citados tienen acceso restringido tras muros de pago (paywalls), 5) la revista más deseada de la región es a su vez la más sospechosa, 6) existe una distribución de Pareto en términos de documentos-citaciones y autores-citaciones, 7) la participación de investigadoras es muy reducida, 8) las organizaciones privadas cumplen un papel relevante en las afiliaciones de los autores más citados y 9) hay una ausencia de liderazgo por parte de los autores de la región en los estudios en que participan múltiples autores.spa
dc.description.abstractThere has been considerable research on business, management, and accounting (BMA) over the past century. Amid this intellectual ocean, more recently disturbed by the digital tide, bibliometric methods are crucial to identifying leading authors and emerging research topics and calculating the impact of research. Although they are important, regions such as Ibero-America have often been overlooked in global studies. Consequently, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of the ten most cited BMA documents in each country in Ibero-America from 1996 to 2017, using the citation database Scopus. We considered 19 variables when conducting the bibliometric analysis. The main findings were: 1) a rapid increase in document production; 2) both Spain and Portugal domain the overall documents’ production and citations; 3) English is the lingua franca; 4) the most discussed documents lie behind paywalls; 5) the most desired journal in the region is also the most suspicious; 6) there is a Pareto distribution in terms of both document-citations and uthorcitations; 7) there was negligible participation by female authors; 8) private organizations played a lead role in terms of author affiliation; and 9) there was a lack of leadership of regional authors when conducting research with several co-authors.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18009
dc.identifier.issn2463-1892
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 153
dc.relation.citationTitleDocumento de investigación
dc.relation.ispartofDocumentos de Investigación. Facultad de Administración, ISSNe: 2463-1892 No. 153, (mayo de 2018)spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationaacsb (2017a). Eligibility procedures and accreditations standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/59VXkm
dc.source.bibliographicCitationaacsb (2017b). AACSB-accredited business schools & universities. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/ofn9EC
dc.source.bibliographicCitationaacsb. (n.d.). What we do. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/xdgiPv
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAarts, A. A.; Anderson, J. E.; Anderson, C. J.; Attridge, P. R.; Attwood, A.; Axt, J.; … Zuni, K. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science 349(6251): aac4716.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbramo, G.; D’Angelo, C. A.; Di Costa, F.; &Solazzi, M. (2009). Universityindustry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination, Technovation 29(6–7): 498-507.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlbort-Morant, G.; Leal-Rodriguez, A. L.; Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & Ariza- Montes, A. (2018). Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: a bibliometric analysis, European Research on Management and Business Economics 24(1): 42-52.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAltmetrics (2018). An introduction. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/zcZ1Di
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArbaugh, J. B.; & Hwang, A. (2015). What are the 100 most cited articles in business and management education research, and what do they tell us? Organization Management Journal 12(3): 154-175.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArias, A. V.; Restrepo, I. M.; & Restrepo, A. M. (2016). Intención emprendedora en estudiantes universitarios: Un estudio bibliométrico, Intangible Capital 12(4): 881-922.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaumgartner, H. (2010). Bibliometric reflections on the history of consumer research, Journal of Consumer Psychology 20(3): 233–238.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBookstein, A. (1979). Explanations of the bibliometric laws, Collection Management 3(2–3): 151-162.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBornmann, L. (2012). The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review, Scientometrics 91(3): 857-862.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationButcher, J.; Jeffrey, P. (2005). The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry-academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment, Technovation 25(11): 1273-1280.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallaway, E. (2016). Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric, Nature 535: 210-211.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCasillas, J. C.; & Acedo, F. J. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: a bibliometric study of FBR, Family Business Review 20(2): 141-162.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5000 authors, Nature: doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17567.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChabowski, B. R.; Samiee, S.; & Hult, G. T. M. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda, Journal of International Business Studies 44(6): 622-634.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChung, K. H.; Pak, H. S.; & Cox, R. A. K. (1992). Patterns of research output in the accounting literature: a study of the bibliometric distributions, Abacus 28(2): 168-185.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCobo, M. J.; Martínez, M. A.; Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M.; Fujita, H.; & Herrera- Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at Knowledge-Based Systems: a bibliometric analysis, Knowledge-Based Systems 80: 3-13.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCostas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; & Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(10): 2003-2019.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDaepp, M. I. G.; Hamilton, M. J.; West, G. B.; Bettencourt, & L. M. A. (2015). The mortality of companies, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 12(106): 20150120.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Bakker, F. G. A.; Groenewegen, P.; & Den Hond, F. (2006). A research note on the use of bibliometrics to review the corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance literature, Business and Society 45(1): 7-19.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Mascena, K. M. C.; Figueiredo, F. C.; & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2013). Clusters e APLs: análise bibliométrica das publicações nacionais no período de 2000 a 2011, RAE Revista de Administração de Empresas 53(5): 454-468.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science big science…and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDurand, R.; & McGuire, J. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: the case of aacsb, Organizational Studies 26(2): 165-196.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDurisin, B.; Calabretta, G.; & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: a bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984-2004, Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(3): 437-451.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFavaretto, J. E. R.; & Francisco, E. R. (2017). Exploração do acervo da RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas (de 1961 a 2016) à luz da bibliometria, text mining, rede social e geoanálise, RAE Revista de Administração de Empresas 57(4), 365-390.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFeng, Y.; Zhu, Q.; & Lai, K.-H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: a literature review and bibliometric analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production 158: 296-307.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFerreira, M. P.; Santos, J. C.; De Almeida, M. I. R.; & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: a bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980-2010, Journal of Business Research 67(12): 2550-2558.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFetscherin, M.; & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: a bibliometric citation meta-analysis, Journal of Business Research 68(2): 380-390.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFlórez-Parra, J. M.; López-Pérez, M. V.; & López-Hernández, A. M. (2014). Gobierno corporativo y sector público: Un estudio bibliométrico en las principales revistas ISI, Innovar 24(51): 79-98.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGallardo-Gallardo, E.; Nijs, S.; Dries, N.; & Gallo, P. (2015). Towards an understanding of talent management as a phenomenon-driven field using bibliometric and content analysis, Human Resource Management Review 25(3): 264-279.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGavel, Y.; Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study, Online Information Review 32(1): 8–21.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGross, P.; Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education, Science 66: 385-389.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGuevara, M. R.; Hartmann, D.; Aristarán, M.; Mendoza, M.; & Hidalgo, C. A. (2016). The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations, Scientometrics 109(3): 1695-1709.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHaley, U.; Page, M.; Pitsis, T.; Rivas, J.; & Yu, K. (2017). Measuring and achieving scholarly impact. Morgantown, WV: The Academy of Management.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHall, C. M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism, Tourism Management 32(1): 16-27.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities, Scientometrics 101(2): 1419-1430.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, PNAS 102(46): 16569-16572.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInter-American Bank (2014). Women in science and technology: what does the literature say? Washington: Inter-American Bank.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationISO. (n.d.). Country codes – ISO 3166. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/HA6M9R
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim, J.; McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of internet advertising research: a bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources, Journal of Advertising 37(1): 99-112.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKoenig, M. E. D. (1983). A bibliometric analysis of pharmaceutical research, Research Policy 12(1): 15-36.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKoseoglu, M. A.; Rahimi, R.; Okumus, F.; & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism, Annals of Tourism Research 61: 180-198.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKostoff, R. N.; Toothman, D. R.; Eberhart, H. J.; & Humenik, J. A. (2001). Text mining using database tomography and bibliometrics: a review, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68(3): 223-253.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLarivière, V.; Haustein, S.; & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era, PLOS ONE 10(6): e0127502. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLazzarotti, F.; Dalfovo, M. S.; & Hoffmann, V. E. (2011). A bibliometric study of innovation based on Schumpeter, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 6(4): 121-135.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLopes, A. P. V. B. V.; & De Carvalho, M. M. (2012). The evolution of the literature on innovation in cooperative relationships: a bibliometric study for the last two decades, Gestao e Producao 19(1): 203-217.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLópez-Fernández, M. C.; Serrano-Bedia, A. M.; & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and family firm research: a bibliometric analysis of an emerging field, Journal of Small Business Management 54(2): 622-639.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMa, Z.; Liang, D.; Yu, K.-H.; & Lee, Y. (2012). Most cited business ethics publications: mapping the intellectual structure of business ethics studies in 2001-2008, Business Ethics 21(3): 286-297.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMapping Scientific Excellence (2018). Mapping scientific excellence in business, management and accounting. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/ VVKgcL
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarsilio, M.; Cappellaro, G.; & Cuccurullo, C. (2011). The intellectual structure of research into PPPS: a bibliometric analysis, Public Management Review 13(6): 763-782.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcMillan, G. S.; & Hamilton, R. D., III. (2000). Using bibliometrics to measure firm knowledge: an analysis of the us pharmaceutical industry, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 12(4): 465-476.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerigó, J. M.; Mas-Tur, A.; Roig-Tierno, N.; & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014, Journal of Business Research 68(12): 2645-2653.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerigó, J. M.; Rocafort, A.; & Aznar-Alarcón, J. P. (2016). Bibliometric overview of business & economics research, Journal of Business Economics and Management 17(3): 397-413.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerigó, J. M.; Yang, J.-B. (2017a). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science, Omega 73: 37-48.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerigó, J. M.; Yang, J.-B. (2017b). Accounting research: a bibliometric analysis, Australian Accounting Review 27(1): 71-100.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science, Science 159(3810): 56-63.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationmit Technology Review (2018). Business impact – If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance. Retrieved from: https://goo. gl/VTPxYX
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMongeon, P.; & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis, Scientometrics 106(1): 213-228.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoya, S.; & Prior, D. (2008). ¿Quién publica en las revistas españolas de contabilidad? Análisis bibliométrico del periodo 1996-2005, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 37(138): 353-374.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNarin, F.; & Rozek, R. P. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of us pharmaceutical industry research performance, Research Policy 17(3): 139-154.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNeeley, T. (2012). Global business speaks English, Harvard Business Review 90(5): 116-124.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationO’Leary, D. E. (2007). Human systems management: the most cited papers, Human Systems Management 26(3): 153-156.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationO’Leary, D. E. (2009). The ten most-cited papers in Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting: the first five years, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 6(1): 1-3.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNature Editorial Staff (2016). Time to remodel the journal impact factor, Nature 535(466): doi:10.1038/535466a.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPalmer, A. L.; Sesé, A.; & Montano, J. J. (2005). Tourism and statistics: bibliometric study 1998-2002, Annals of Tourism Research 32(1): 167-178.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPeng, M. W.; & Zhou, J. Q. (2006). Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research, Journal of International Management 12(4): 490-508.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPodsakoff, P. M.; MacKenzie, S. B.; Podsakoff, N. P.; & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: a bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century, Journal of Management 34(4): 641-720.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuacquarelli Symonds (QS) (2018). Top universities by subject– business and management. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/j2TG3G
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRafols, I.; Hopkins, M. M.; Hoekman, J.; Siepel, J.; O’Hare, A.; Perianes- Rodríguez, A.; & Nightingale, P. (2014). Big Pharma, little science? A bibliometric perspective on Big Pharma’s R&D decline, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81(1): 22-38.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRamos-Rodríguez, A.-R.; & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000, Strategic Management Journal 25(10): 981-1004.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRandhawa, K.; Wilden, R.; & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: setting a research agenda, Journal of Product Innovation Management 33(6): 750-772.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRey-Martí, A.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D.; & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Research 69(5): 1651-1655.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRonen, S.; Gonçalves, B.; Hu, K.; Vespignani, A.; Pinker, S.; & Hidalgo, C. (2014). Links that speak: the global language network and its association with global fame, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 111(52): ES1616-ES1622.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuhanen, L.; Weiler, B.; Moyle, B. D.; & McLennan, C.-L. J. (2015). Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: a 25-year bibliometric analysis, Journal of Sustainable Tourism 23(4): 517-535.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSamiee, S.; & Chabowski, B. R. (2012). Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(2): 364-386.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSax, L. J.; Hagedorn, L. S.; Arredondo, M.; & Dicrisi, F. A., (2002). Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors, Research in Higher Education 43(4), 423-446.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchulz, A.-C.; & Nicolai, A. T. (2015). The intellectual link between management research and popularization media: a bibliometric analysis of the Harvard Business Review, Academy of Management Learning and Education 14(1): 31-49.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSCImago (n.d.). Journal ranking. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/S7GKXK
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScopus (2015). Breaking the 1996 barrier: Scopus adds nearly 4 million pre-1996 articles and more than 83 million references. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/GuA7Lt
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScopus (2018). Scopus. Retrieved from: https://www.scopus.com/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSelva, C.; Sahagún, M. A.; & Pallarès, S. (2011). Estudios sobre trayectoria profesional y acceso de la mujer a cargos directivos: Un análisis bibliométrico, Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 27(3): 227-242.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationServantie, V.; Cabrol, M.; Guieu, G.; & Boissin, J.-P. (2016). Is international entrepreneurship a field? A bibliometric analysis of the literature (1989- 2015), Journal of International Entrepreneurship 14(2): 168-212.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSinclair, S.; & Geoffrey, R. (2016). Voyant tools. Retrieved from: http:// voyant-tools.org/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmith, D. R. (2012). Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research, Scientometrics 92(2): 419-427.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStoet, G.; & Geary, D. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education, Psychological Science: 0956797617741719.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSud, P.; & Thelwall, M. (2014). Evaluating altmetrics, Scientometrics 98(2): 1131-1143.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTalukdar, D. (2011). Patterns of research productivity in the business ethics literature: insights from analyses of bibliometric distributions, Journal of Business Ethics 98(1): 137-151.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThelwall, M. (2012). Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective, Scientometrics 92(2): 429-441.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (unesco) (2017). Women in science. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/AQHdQp
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUysal, Ö. Ö. (2010). Business ethics research with an accounting focus: a bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2007, Journal of Business Ethics 93(1): 137-160.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationValenzuela, L. M.; Merigó, J. M.; Johnston, W. J.; Nicolas, C.; & Jaramillo, J. F. (2017). Thirty years of the Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing: a bibliometric analysis, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 32(1): 1-17.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVogel, R.; & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: a bibliometric review, International Journal of Management Reviews 15(4): 426-446.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVolery, T.; & Mazzarol, T. (2015). The evolution of the small business and entrepreneurship field: a bibliometric investigation of articles published in the International Small Business Journal, International Small Business Journal 33(4): 374-396.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWallin, M. W. (2012). The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice 14(2): 162-177.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWatts, D. J. (2017). Should social science be more solution-oriented? Nature Human Behaviour 1(1).
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWeisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia, Social Forces 96(2): 529-560.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWorld Economic Forum (wef) (2018). These 100 companies are leading the world in artificial intelligence. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/9fBH9Z
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWoon, W. L.; Zeineldin, H.; & Madnick, S. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of distributed generation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(3): 408-420.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWuchty, S.; Jones, B. F.; & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science 316(5827): 1036-1039.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYeo, W.; Kim, S.; Park, H.; & Kang, J. (2015). A bibliometric method for measuring the degree of technological innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 95: 152-162.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZahedi, Z.; Costas, R.; &Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications, Scientometrics 101(2): 1491-1513.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZupic, I.; & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization, Organizational Research Methods 18(3): 429-472.
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectNegociosspa
dc.subjectAdministraciónspa
dc.subjectContabilidadspa
dc.subjectBibliometríaspa
dc.subjectCienciometríaspa
dc.subjectIberoaméricaspa
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaspa
dc.subject.ddcOperaciones bibliotecarias
dc.subject.keywordBusinesseng
dc.subject.keywordManagementeng
dc.subject.keywordAccountingeng
dc.subject.keywordBibliometricseng
dc.subject.keywordScientometricseng
dc.subject.keywordIbero-Americaeng
dc.subject.keywordLatin Americaeng
dc.subject.lembAdministración de empresasspa
dc.subject.lembContabilidadspa
dc.subject.lembBibliometríaspa
dc.titleA Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Documents in Business, Management and Accounting in Ibero-Americaspa
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
BI 153 admon web.pdf
Tamaño:
609.15 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Escuela de Administración