Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Transit Infrastructure and Informal Housing: Assessing an Expansion of the Medellin’s Metrocable System

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.gruplacGrupo de investigaciones. Facultad de Economía. Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.creatorPosada, Héctor M.
dc.creatorGarcía Suaza, Andrés Felipe
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T13:39:37Z
dc.date.available2021-04-23T13:39:37Z
dc.date.created2021-04-22
dc.date.issued2021-04-24
dc.descriptionLas políticas de transporte tienen una incidencia importante en la asignación de recursos dentro de las ciudades. Por lo tanto, investigar los impactos de la inversión en tránsito es relevante especialmente en los países en desarrollo donde la vivienda informal es muy prevalente y las disparidades espaciales son notables. Estudiamos el impacto de una expansión de tránsito del sistema Metrocable en Medellín (Colombia) como escenario natural para comprender los vínculos causales entre la reducción del costo de acceso y la vivienda informal. Utilizando una estrategia de identificación de diferencias en diferencias, estimamos que la expansión de la Línea H de Metrocable reduce la vivienda informal hasta en 15 puntos porcentuales. También mostramos que la magnitud del efecto depende de la distancia a la intervención. Al explorar los posibles mecanismos que median la relación causal analizada, encontramos que el mercado laboral juega un papel crucial.spa
dc.description.abstractTransportation policies have an important incidence on the allocation of resources within cities. Therefore, investigating the impacts of transit investment is relevant especially in developing countries where informal housing is highly prevalent and spatial disparities are remarkable. We study the impact of a transit expansion of the Metrocable system in Medellín (Colombia) as a natural scenario to understand the causal links between lowering access cost and informal housing. Using a difference-in-difference identification strategy, we estimate that the expasion of Line H of Metrocable reduces informal housing up to 15 percentage points. We also show that the magnitude of the effect depends on the distance to the intervention. When exploring potential mechanisms mediating the analyzed causal relation we find that the labor market plays a crucial role.spa
dc.format.extent34 pp.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.geoLocationMedellín, Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.citationPosada, Héctor M.; Garcia-Suaza, Andres. (2021) Transit Infrastructure and Informal Housing: Assessing an Expansion of the Medellin’s Metrocable System. Universidad del Rosario, Department of Economics, Documentos de trabajo economía. 34 pp.spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_31247
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/31247
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Economía
dc.relation.ispartofDocumentos de trabajo economía, (2021); 34 pp.spa
dc.relation.urihttps://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/019239.html
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationArnott RJ, Stiglitz JE. 1981. Aggregate Land Rents and Aggregate Transport Costs. The Economic Journal. 91(362):331spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaum-Snow N, Turner MA. 2017. Transport infrastructure and the decentralization of cities in the people’s Republic of China. Asian Development Review. 34(2):25–50spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBerg CN, Deichmann U, Liu Y, Selod H. 2017. Transport Policies and Development. Journal of Development Studies. 53(4):465–80spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBillings SB. 2011. Estimating the value of a new transit option. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 41(6):525–36spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBlanco C, Kobayashi H. 2009. Urban transformation in slum districts through public space generation and cable transformation at Northeastern area: Medellin, Colombia. The Journal of International Social Research. 2(8):75–90spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBocarejo JP, Escobar D, Hernandez DO, Galarza D. 2016. Accessibility analysis of the integrated transit system of Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 10(4):308–20spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBocarejo JP, Oviedo DR. 2012. Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography. 24:142–54spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoisjoly G, Moreno-Monroy AI, El-Geneidy A. 2017. Informality and accessibility to jobs by public transit: Evidence from the São Paulo Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography. 64(August):89–96spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBonet-Morón JA, Pérez-Valbuena GJ, Chiriví EJ. 2016. Informalidad laboral y en la vivienda : primeros indicios para las principales ciudades colombianas. Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional y Urbana ; No. 241spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBörjesson M, Eliasson J, Rubensson I. 2020. Distributional effects of public transport subsidies. Journal of Transport Geography. 84(February):102674spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrueckner JK, Lall SV. 2015. Cities in Developing Countries. Fueled by Rural-Urban Migration, Lacking in Tenure Security, and Short of Affordable Housing., Vol. 5. Elsevier B.V. 1st ed.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCanavire-Bacarreza G, Duque JC, Urrego JA. 2016. Moving citizens and deterring criminals : innovation in public transport facilities. Development Bank of Latin America. (November):47spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCattaneo BMD, Galiani S, Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Titiunik R. 2009. Housing, Health, and Happiness †. 75–105spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCavalcanti T, Da Mata D, Santos M. 2019. On the Determinants of Slum Formation. Economic Journal. 129(621):1971–91spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCohen JP, Paul CM. 2007. The impacts of transportation infrastructure on property values: A higher-order spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Regional Science. 47(3):457–78spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDaude C, Fajardo G, Brassiolo P, Estrada R, Goytia C, et al. 2017. Crecimiento urbano y acceso a oportunidades, Vol. 11spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDaude C, Fajardo G, Brassiolo P, Estrada R, Goytia C, et al. 2017. Crecimiento urbano y acceso a oportunidades, Vol. 11spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDorantes LM, Paez A, Vassallo JM. 2011. Analysis of house prices to assess economic impacts of new public transport infrastructure: Madrid Metro Line 12. Transportation Research Record. (2245):131–39spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDurand-Lasserve A. 2006. Informal Settlements and the Millennium Development Goals: Global Policy Debates On Property Ownership And Security Of Tenure. Global Urban Development. 2(1)spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDustan A, Ngo DKL. 2018. Commuting to educational opportunity? School choice effects of mass transit expansion in Mexico City. Economics of Education Review. 63(January):116–33spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEfthymiou D, Antoniou C. 2013. How do transport infrastructure and policies affect house prices and rents? Evidence from Athens, Greece. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 52(June):1–22spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFekade W. 2000. Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responsesspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFekade W. 2000. Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responses under rapid urban growth, an international perspective. Habitat International. 24(2):127–50spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFlemming J. 2020. Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Costly Commuting and the Job Ladder Costly Commuting and the Job Ladderspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGaisie E. 2015. Provision and Management of Infrastructural Facilities in Informal Settlements in Kumasispa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGaliani S, Gertler PJ, Undurraga R, Cooper R, Martínez S, Ross A. 2017. Shelter from the storm: Upgrading housing infrastructure in Latin American slums. Journal of Urban Economics. 98:187–213spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGallego JM, Sepúlveda C, González JI. 2019. Dinámica del bienestar social en Bogotá y su región, 2011-2017spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarsous G, Suárez-Alemán A, Serebrisky T. 2019. Cable cars in urban transport: Travel time savings from La Paz-El Alto (Bolivia). Transport Policy. 75(May):171–82spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGechter M, Tsivanidis N. 2020. Spatial Spillovers from Urban Renewal: Evidence from the Mumbai Mills Redevelopment. Working Paperspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGibbons S, Machin S. 2005. Valuing rail access using transport innovations. Journal of Urban Economics. 57(1):148–69spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGibbons S, Machin S. 2008. Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: Evidence from house prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 24(1):99–119spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlaeser EL. 2020. Infrastructure and Urban Formspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlaeser EL, Kahn ME, Rappaport J. 2008. Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics. 63(1):1–24spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGobillon L, Selod H, Zenou Y. 2007. The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies. 44(12):2401–28spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGonzalez-Navarro M, Quintana-Domeque C. 2014. PAVING STREETS FOR THE POOR: EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF INFRASTRUCTURE EFFECTS. Review of Economics and Statistics. 96(4):710–28spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarris JR, Todaro MP. 1970. Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review1. 60(1):126–42spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHeinrichs D, Bernet JS. 2014. Public Transport and Accessibility in Informal Settlements: Aerial Cable Cars in Medellín, Colombia. Transportation Research Procedia. 4:55–67spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHongbo D, Mulley C. 2006. Relationship between transport accessibility and land value: Local model approach with geographically weighted regression. Transportation Research Record. (1977):197–205spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHu L. 2017. Job accessibility and employment outcomes: which income groups benefit the most? Transportation. 44(6):1421–43spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKain JF. 1968. Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 82(2):175–97spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKhanna G, Medina C, Nyshadham A, Ramos D, Tamayo J, Tiew A. 2020. Spatial Mobility , Economic Opportunity , and Crime. 02163:1–42spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMahabir R, Crooks A, Croitoru A, Agouris P. 2016. The study of slums as social and physical constructs: Challenges and emerging research opportunities. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 3(1):399–419spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcIntosh C, Alegría T, Ordóñez G, Zenteno R. 2018. The neighborhood impacts of local infrastructure investment: Evidence from urban Mexico. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 10(3):263–86spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoreno-Monroy AI, Posada HM. 2018. The effect of commuting costs and transport subsidies on informality rates. Journal of Development Economics. 130(August):99– 112spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoreno-Monroy AI, Roman F. 2015. The impact of public transport expansions on informality: the case of the São Paulo Metropolitan Regionspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMüller S, Tscharaktschiew S, Haase K. 2008. Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas. Journal of Transport Geography. 16(5):342–57spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOrdóñez-Barba G, Alegría-Olazábal T, McIntosh C, Zenteno-Quintero R. 2013. Alcances e impactos del Programa Hábitat en comunidades pobres urbanas de México. Papeles de Poblacion. 19(77):231–67spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOviedo D, Scholl L, Innao M. 2019. Do bus rapid transit Systems improve accessibility to jobs?. case Lima. (March):1–27spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRedding SJ, Turner MA. 2015. Transportation Costs and the Spatial Organization of Economic Activity, Vol. 5. Elsevier B.V. 1st ed.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRietveld Piet, Bruinsma FR. 1998. Is Transport Infrastructure Effective?spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoberts M, Melecky M, Bougna T, Xu Y. 2020. Transport corridors and their wider economic benefits: A quantitative review of the literature. Journal of Regional Science. 60(2):207–48spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRotger GP, Nielsen TS. 2015. Effects of job accessibility improved by public transport system: Natural experimental evidence from the copenhagen metro. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 15(4):419–41spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSerebrisky T, Gómez-Lobo A, Estupiñán N, Muñoz-Raskin R. 2009. Affordability and subsidies in public urban transport: What do we mean, what can be done? Transport Reviews. 29(6):715–39spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSoares F, Soares Y. 2005. The Socio-Economic Impact of Favela-Bairro: What do the Data Say? Office of Evaluation and Oversight. (August)spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSu Q, DeSalvo J. 2008. The effect of transportation subsidies on urban sprawl. Journal of Regional Science. 48(3):567–94spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSuárez M, Murata M, Delgado Campos J. 2016. Why do the poor travel less? Urban structure, commuting and economic informality in Mexico City. Urban Studies. 53(12):2548–66spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTsivanidis N. 2019. Evaluating the Impact of Urban Transit Infrastructure: Evidence from Bogotá’s TransMilenio . (November 2017)spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUN-Habitat. 2003. The Challenges of Slums, Global Report on Human Settlements. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 15(3):337–38spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUN-Habitat. 2012. State of Latin American and Caribbean cities: Towards a new urban transition. Nairobispa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWarnes PE. 2020. Transport Infrastructure Improvements and Spatial Sorting : Evidence from Buenos Airesspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWeisbrod G. 2008. Models to predict the economic development impact of transportation projects: Historical experience and new applications. Annals of Regional Science. 42(3):519–43spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWheaton WC. 1977. Residential Decentralization, Land Rents, and the Benefits of Urban Transportation Investment. American Economic Association. 67(2):138–43spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWorld Bank. 2012. Conducting Impact Evaluations in Urban Transport. Doing Impact Evaluation Series No. 5. 66:37–39spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZárate D. 2019. Factor Allocation, Informality, and Transit Improvements: Evidence from Mexico City *. 30spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZenou Y. 2009. Urban search models under high-relocation costs. Theory and application to spatial mismatch. Labour Economics. 16(5):534–46spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectCorrelación desarrollo del transporte publico disminución de asentamientos irregularesspa
dc.subjectTransporte publico y la transformación del territoriospa
dc.subjectImpacto del transporte en el ordenamiento de la ciudadspa
dc.subjectVivienda informalspa
dc.subjectCosto de transporte publicospa
dc.subjectPrecio del terrenospa
dc.subjectMercado laboral informal en Colombiaspa
dc.subject.ddcEconomíaspa
dc.subject.ddcComercio, comunicaciones, transportespa
dc.subject.jelR41spa
dc.subject.jelR42spa
dc.subject.jelR31spa
dc.subject.jelJ46spa
dc.subject.keywordInformal housingspa
dc.subject.keywordTransportation costspa
dc.subject.keywordLand valuespa
dc.subject.keywordInformal labor market in Colombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordCorrelation development of public transport decrease of irregular settlementsspa
dc.subject.keywordPublic transport and the transformation of the territoryspa
dc.subject.keywordImpact of transport on city planningspa
dc.titleTransit Infrastructure and Informal Housing: Assessing an Expansion of the Medellin’s Metrocable Systemspa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleInfraestructura de tránsito y vivienda informal: evaluación de una expansión del sistema Metrocable de Medellínspa
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draft
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
index267.html
Tamaño:
221 B
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descripción:
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
dt267.pdf
Tamaño:
3.92 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Serie Documentos de Trabajo. Facultad de Economía