Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Graphs in phylogenetic comparative analysis: Anscombe's quartet revisited

dc.creatorRevell, Liam J.spa
dc.creatorSchliep, Klausspa
dc.creatorValderrama, Eugeniospa
dc.creatorRichardson, James-Edwardspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T23:57:03Z
dc.date.available2020-05-25T23:57:03Z
dc.date.created2018spa
dc.description.abstractIn 1973, the statistician Francis Anscombe used a clever set of bivariate datasets (now known as Anscombe's quartet) to illustrate the importance of graphing data as a component of statistical analyses. In his example, each of the four datasets yielded identical regression coefficients and model fits, and yet when visualized revealed strikingly different patterns of covariation between x and y. Phylogenetic comparative methods (the set of methodologies that use phylogenies, often combined with phenotypic trait data, to make inferences about evolution) are statistical methods too; yet visualizing the data and phylogeny in a sensible way that would permit us to detect unexpected patterns or unanticipated deviations from model assumptions is not a routine component of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Here, we use a quartet of phylogenetic datasets to illustrate that the same estimated parameters and model fits can be obtained from data that were generated using markedly different procedures—including pure Brownian motion evolution and randomly selected data uncorrelated with the tree. Just as in the case of Anscombe's quartet, when graphed the differences between the four datasets are quickly revealed. The intent of this article is to help build the general case that phylogenetic comparative methods are statistical methods and consequently that graphing or visualization should invariably be included as an essential step in our standard data analytical pipelines. Phylogenies are complex data structures and thus visualizing data on trees in a meaningful and useful way is a challenging endeavour. We recommend that the development of graphical methods for simultaneously visualizing data and tree should continue to be an important goal in phylogenetic comparative biology. © 2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Societyeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13067
dc.identifier.issn2041210X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22592
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Societyspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage2154
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 10
dc.relation.citationStartPage2145
dc.relation.citationTitleMethods in Ecology and Evolution
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 9
dc.relation.ispartofMethods in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2041210X, Vol.9, No.10 (2018); pp. 2145-2154spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052841574&doi=10.1111%2f2041-210X.13067&partnerID=40&md5=46423989d0a53345675ae8b01ea2b2bdspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordComparative methodsspa
dc.subject.keywordMacroevolutionspa
dc.subject.keywordPhylogenyspa
dc.subject.keywordPlottingspa
dc.subject.keywordVisualizationspa
dc.titleGraphs in phylogenetic comparative analysis: Anscombe's quartet revisitedspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones