Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Issues related to the imposition of sentences in international tribunals

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.gruplacClínica Jurídica Internacionalspa
dc.creatorHernández Cortés, Clara Esperanza
dc.creatorGiraldo, Antonio
dc.creatorSánchez Sarmiento, Andrés
dc.creatorGonzález, Viviana
dc.creatorVargas, Laura
dc.creatorRestrepo, Laura
dc.creatorVillarraga, Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T19:03:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-20T19:03:51Z
dc.date.created2018-06
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis memorandum has been written by the following members of the eighth promotion (2018) of the International Law Clinic, organized by the Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia and the IberoAmerican Institute of The Hague for Peace, Human Rights and International Justice (The Netherlands). This paper is part of the research work carried out from September 2018 to April 2019 by the International Law Clinic, organized by the Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia and the Ibero-American Institute of The Hague for Peace, Human Rights and International Justice (IIH), at the request of the Office of Public Counsel for the Victims (OPCV) of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It answers the following questions: In the context of sentencing in all cases before the ICC, how has the scope of victimization caused by the crimes, for which the accused has been convicted, been considered to determine the sentence? In the context of sentencing in all cases before the ICC, have the crimes proved beyond reasonable doubt to establish the contextual elements of crimes against humanity been considered to impose the sentence? Have some of the crimes committed by the convicted person been found to be more serious in quality and/or quantity than others to determine the penalty (i.e. aggravating circumstances)? In order to answer these questions, the memorandum will be separated into four chapters. At the outset, there will be a brief analysis of article 78 of the Rome Statute and Rule 145 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, which applies transversely to all questions. Once this has been defined, the question of the role of the scope of victimization in determining the sentence will be analyzed. Then, it will be considered whether the crimes that constitute the contextual elements of crimes against humanity are considered as relevant factors when determining the sentence. Finally, we will study how the crimes for which a person has been convicted have been differentiated according to the seriousness of the crimes at the time of the imposition of the sentence.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_20127
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20127
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Jurisprudenciaspa
dc.relation.citationTitleClínica Jurídica Internacional
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Ascoli, Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The UN Ad Hoc Tribunals and Future Perspectives for the ICC, (2011), p. 133spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber I, Case The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, “Decision on Sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute”. July 12 2012. No.: ICC-01/04-01/06.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber II, Case The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, “Decision on Sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute” May 23 2014, No.: ICC01/04-01/07. http://www.legal-tools.org/doc/5af172/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber VIII, Case The Prosecutor v. Almah Al Faqi Al Mahdi, “judgement and sentence” September 27 2016, No.: ICC-01/12-01/15. http://www.legal-tools.org/doc/042397/pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber III, Case The Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo “Decision on Sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute” June 21 2016 No.: ICC-01/05-01/08. http://www.legal-tools.org/doc/f4c14e/pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStatute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, september 2009, article 24 (2). http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Statute/statute_sept09_en.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 8 july 2015, rule 101 (B). http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Rules_procedure_evidence/IT032Rev50_en.pd f.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvocka, Dragoljub Prcac, Milojica Kos, Mlado Radic, Zoran Zigic, “judgement” ICTY IT-98-30/1-T, 2 november 2001. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kvocka/tjug/en/kvo-tj011002e.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, case Prosecutor v. Dario Kordic & Mario Cerkez, Trial Chamber, “judgement” IT-95-14/2-T, 26 february 2001. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kordic_cerkez/tjug/en/kor-tj010226e.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreskic, Mirjan Kupreskic, Vlatko Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic & Vladimir Santic “appeal Judgement” IT-95-16-A, 23 octuber 2001. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kupreskic/acjug/en/kup-aj011023e.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Mico Stanisic & Stojan Zupljanin, “judgement volumen 2” IT-08-91-T, 27 march 2013. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/zupljanin_stanisicm/tjug/en/130327-2.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber II, case Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac, “judgement” IT-97-25-T, 15 march 2002. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/krnojelac/tjug/en/krn-tj020315e.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, “judgement” IT-95-14-T, 3 march 2000. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/tjug/en/bla-tj000303e.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Radoslav Brdjanin, “judgement” September 1 2004, No.: IT-99-36-T. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4c3228/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber II, case The Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, sentencing judgement, No. IT-94-2-S, December 18 2003. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/f8722c/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case The Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo, sentencing judgment, No. IT-95-17, December 7 2005. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e10281/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, case The Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojevic & Drajan Jokic, No. IT-02-60-T, January 15 2005. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/7483f2/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, case Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, “judgement and sentence” ICTR 97-23-S, 4 september 1998. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-97-23/trialjudgements/en/980904.pdf.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Trial Chamber II, case Prosecutor v. Clement Kayishema et al., “sentence” ICTR-95-1-T, 21 may 1999. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-95-1/trialjudgements/en/990521-1.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Trial Chamber I, case Prosecutor v. Theoneste Bagosora “judgement and sentence”, ICTR-98-41-T 18 december 2008. http://www.worldcourts.com/ictr/eng/decisions/2008.12.18_Prosecutor_v_Bagosora.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber III, Case The Prosecutor v. Jean-Baptiste Gatete, 31 March 2011, Case No. ICTR-2000-61-T. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-01-72/trialjudgements/en/081202.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber, Case The Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, 4 September 1998, Case no.: ICTR 97-23-S. Par. 42. “…The magnitude of the crimes involving the killing of an estimated 500,000 civilians in Rwanda, in a short span of 100 days constitutes an aggravating fact..” http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/casedocuments/ictr-97-23/trial-judgements/en/980904.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Trial Chamber I, case Prosecutor v. Gatete “judgment and sentence” , ICTR-2000-61-T, 31 march 2011. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-00-61/trialjudgements/en/110331.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal Rwanda, Trial Chamber II, Prosecutor v. Bizimingu “judgment and sentence” , ICTR-90-50-T, 30 september 2011. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-99-50/trialjudgements/en/110930.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSpecial Court for Sierra Leone; Trial Chamber, Case No. SCSL-03-01-T, The Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor. Sentencing Judgment. 30 may 2012, para 20; AFRC sentencing judgement, Case No. SCSL 04-16-T. http://www.rscsl.org/Documents/Decisions/Taylor/1285/SCSL-03-01-T-1285.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Kaing Guek Eav, “judgement”, case No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, 26 july 2010. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/dbdb62/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationExtraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, case Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea & Khieu Samphan, “judgement”, case No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, 07 august 2014. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/4888de/pdf/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Court, Trial Chamber III, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, June 21 2016, ICC-01/05-01/08. https://www.icccpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2016_04476.PDF.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, Prosecutor v. Obrenović (IT-02-60/2-S), 10 December 2003, Trial Chamber, judgement.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, Prosecutor v. Kunarac et al. (IT-96-23 & 23/1), 12 june 2002 Trial Chamber, judgement. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/tjug/en/kun-tj010222e.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, The Appeals Chamber, Case The Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo, Judgment, No. IT-96-21-A, February 20 2001. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/mucic/acjug/en/cel-aj010220.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, The Appeals Chamber, case The prosecutor against Anto Furundzija, Case IT-95-17/1-A. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/furundzija/tjug/en/fur-tj981210e.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber II, Case The Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Judgment, No. IT-01-42-T, January 31 2005. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/strugar/tjug/en/str-tj050131e.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber II, Case The Prosecutor v. Gaspard Kanyarukiga, 1 November 2010, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-T. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-02-78/trialjudgements/en/101101.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber III, Case The Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi, 2 December 2008, Case No. ICTR-01-72-T. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-01-72/trialjudgements/en/081202.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber III, Case The Prosecutor v. Sylvestre Gacumbtsi, 17 June 2004, Case No. ICTR-2001-64-T. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-01-72/trialjudgements/en/081202.pdfspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Criminal Tribunal for Ruanda, Trial Chamber, Case The Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, 4 September 1998, Case no.: ICTR 97-23-S. http://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-97-23/trialjudgements/en/980904.pdfspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectCorte penal internacionalspa
dc.subjectVictimizaciónspa
dc.subjectElementos contextuales de crímenes contra la humanidadspa
dc.subjectEstatuto de Romaspa
dc.subjectTribunal Penal Internacional para la ex Yugoslaviaspa
dc.subjectTribunal Penal Internacional para Ruandaspa
dc.subjectEl tribunal especial para Sierra Leonaspa
dc.subjectSentenciaspa
dc.subjectCámaras extraordinarias en los tribunales de Camboyaspa
dc.subject.ddcDerecho internacionalspa
dc.subject.keywordInternational Criminal Courtspa
dc.subject.keywordScope of victimizationspa
dc.subject.keywordContextual elements of crimes against humanityspa
dc.subject.keywordRome Statutespa
dc.subject.keywordThe International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslaviaspa
dc.subject.keywordThe International Criminal Tribunal for Rwandaspa
dc.subject.keywordThe Special Court for Sierra Leonespa
dc.subject.keywordSentencingspa
dc.subject.keywordThe Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodiaspa
dc.subject.lembCorte Penal Internacionalspa
dc.subject.lembSentenciasspa
dc.subject.lembTribunales internacionalesspa
dc.titleIssues related to the imposition of sentences in international tribunalsspa
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Issues related to the imposition of sentences in international tribunals.pdf
Tamaño:
363.33 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento del texto en PDF
Descargar
Colecciones
Clínica Jurídica Internacional