Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Cuidados generales en el manejo del traumatismo craneoencefalico grave: consenso latinoamericano.

dc.creatorGodoy, D Aspa
dc.creatorVidetta, Wspa
dc.creatorSanta Cruz, Rspa
dc.creatorSilva, Xspa
dc.creatorAguilera-Rodriguez, Sspa
dc.creatorCarreno-Rodriguez, J Nspa
dc.creatorCiccioli, Fspa
dc.creatorPinero, Gspa
dc.creatorCiro, J Dspa
dc.creatorda Re-Gutierrez, Sspa
dc.creatorDomeniconi, Gspa
dc.creatorFischer, Dspa
dc.creatorHernandez, Ospa
dc.creatorLacerda-Gallardo, Aspa
dc.creatorMejia, Jspa
dc.creatorPanhke, Pspa
dc.creatorRomero, Cspa
dc.creatorLora, F Sspa
dc.creatorSoler-Morejon, Cspa
dc.creatorSufan, J Lspa
dc.creatorMontes, J Mspa
dc.creatorFuenzalida, L Cspa
dc.creatorParahnos, J Lspa
dc.creatorJibaja, Mspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T13:20:51Z
dc.date.available2020-06-11T13:20:51Z
dc.date.created2020spa
dc.description.abstractSevere traumatic brain injury (sTBI) remains prevalent in the young adult population. Indeed, far from descending, the incidence of sTBI remains high. One of the key bases of treatment is to avoid, detect and correct secondary injuries of systemic origin, which aggravate the primary lesion. Much of this can be achieved by maintaining an adequate physiological microenvironment allowing recovery of the damaged brain tissue. General care measures are nonspecific actions designed to meet that objective. The available guidelines on the management of sTBI have not included the topics contemplated in this consensus. In this regard, a group of members of the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC), involved in the different aspects of the acute management of sTBI (neurosurgeons, intensivists, anesthesiologists, neurologists, nurses and physiotherapists) were gathered. An exhaustive literature search was made of selected topics in the LILACS, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and Web of Science databases. To establish recommendations or suggestions with their respective strength or weakness, the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was applied. Additionally, certain recommendations (included in complementary material) were not assessed by GRADE, because they constitute a set of therapeutic actions of effective compliance, in which it was not possible to apply the said methodology. Thirty-two recommendations were established, 16 strong and 16 weak, with their respective levels of evidence. This consensus attempts to standardize and establish basic general care measures in this particular patient population.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2020.01.014
dc.identifier.issn1578-6749
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24601
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEdiciones Doyma S.A.spa
dc.relation.citationTitleMedicina intensiva
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina intensiva, ISSN:1578-6749 (2020); pp. -spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.accesoBloqueado (Texto referencial)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectConsensospa
dc.subjectCuidados generalesspa
dc.subjectHomeostasisspa
dc.subjectLesion secundariaspa
dc.subjectNeuroproteccion fisiologicaspa
dc.subjectTraumatismo craneoencefalicospa
dc.subject.keywordConsensusspa
dc.subject.keywordGeneral carespa
dc.subject.keywordPhysiological neuroprotectionspa
dc.subject.keywordSecondary injuryspa
dc.subject.keywordTraumatic brain injuryspa
dc.titleCuidados generales en el manejo del traumatismo craneoencefalico grave: consenso latinoamericano.spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleGeneral care in the management of severe traumatic brain injury: Latin American consensus.eng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones