Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 4

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T13:20:15Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T13:20:15Z
dc.date.created2020-09-11
dc.descriptionA diferencia de los anteriores tres volúmenes del Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina, en donde se modelaron, analizaron y discutieron redes construidas a partir de información, este volumen presenta redes de colaboración o coautoría a nivel institucional. Se estudiaron las redes de coautoría en más de 17 000 artículos del campo de negocios, administración y contabilidad indexados en la base de datos bibliográfica Scopus publicados por autores de América Latina (ALC). Se modelaron y visualizaron las redes de coautoría para ALC y para cada uno de los países, además de computar la densidad e intermediación de las redes y de los nodos, respectivamente. Las instituciones con mayor intermediación de ALC de diferentes países fueron las universidades de São Paulo (Brasil), los Andes (Colombia) y Chile (Chile). No hay una relación directa entre productividad e intermediación. Instituciones de Guatemala, Costa Rica y México han colaborado con universidades del norte global y con elevadaintermediación mundial, como Pennsylvania, Michigan y Maryland. Las redes de Paraguay, Bolivia u Honduras exhiben una estructura cerrada o densa, mientras que las de Colombia, México o Brasil, una estructura abierta o con múltiples cúmulos conectados indirectamente. Las tres universidades con mayor intermediación también enfocan sus esfuerzos de investigación en términos de elevada intermediación identificados en el tercer volumen del Atlas como desarrollo sostenible y toma de decisiones. Al igual que los tres volúmenes anteriores, se proveen los datos en acceso abierto.spa
dc.description.abstractUnlike the previous three volumes of the Atlas of Management Research in Latin America where networks based on information were modeled, analyzed, and discussed, this volume presents collaboration or co-authorship networks at the institutional level. The co-authorship networks were studied based on more than 17 000 articles in the field of business, management and accounting indexed in the Scopus bibliographic database published by authors from Latin America (LAC). The co-authorship networks for lac and each of the countries, were modeled and visualized, in addition to computing the density and betweenness of the networks and nodes, respectively. The institutions with the highest betweenness in LAC were the universities of São Paulo (Brazil), los Andes (Colombia), and Chile (Chile). There is no direct relationship between productivity and betweenness. Institutions in Guatemala, Costa Rica, and Mexico have collaborated with universities in the global north and with higher betweenness worldwide, such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Maryland. Networks from Paraguay, Bolivia, or Honduras exhibit a closed or dense structure, while those in Colombia, Mexico, or Brazil, an open structure or with multiple clusters connected indirectly. The three universities with the highest betweenness also focus their research efforts on topics of high intermediation identified in the third volume of the Atlas, such as sustainable development and decision making. Like the three previous volumes, data are provided in open access.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_30108
dc.identifier.issn2463-1892
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/30108
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 158
dc.relation.citationTitleDocumento de investigación
dc.relation.ispartofDocumento de investigación, ISSN: 2463-1892, No.158 (septiembre, 2020) 45 pp.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2020a). Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 1 (No. 155). https://repository.urosario. edu.co/handle/10336/28293spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2020b). Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 2 (No. 156). https://repository.urosario. edu.co/handle/10336/28292spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2020b). Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 3 (No. 157). https://repository.urosario. edu.co/handle/10336/29080spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63(7), 1313-1326. https:// doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101(suppl 1), 5200- 5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPutman, R. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modem Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLi, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: a social capital perspective. Res. Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOkoli, C., & Oh, W. (2007). Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: a social capital perspective. Inf. Manag., 44(3), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDebicki, B. J., Matherne III, C. F., Kellermanns, F. W., & Chrisman, J. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium: an overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Fam. Bus. Rev., 22(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509333598spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRutledge, R., & Karim, K. (2009). Determinants of coauthorship for the most productive authors of accounting literature. J. Educ. Bus., 84(3), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.130-134spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSeibert, S. E., Kacmar, K. M., Kraimer, M. L., Downes, P. E., & Noble, D. (2017). The role of research strategies and professional networks in management scholars’ productivity. J. Manage., 43(4), 1103-1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314546196spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcDowell, J. M., Singell Jr., L D., & Stater, M. (2006). Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Econ. Inq., 44(1), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbi065spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBoschini, A., & Sjögren, A. (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. J. Labor Econ., 25(2), 325-365. https://doi.org/10.1086/510764spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDing, W. W., Levin, S. G., Stephan, P. E., & Winkler, A. E. (2010). The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Manage. Sci., 56(9), 1439-1461. https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1195spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarzi, G., Caputo, A., Garces, E., & Dabić, M. (2020). A three decade mixed-method bibliometric investigation of the IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 67(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2870648spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Twenty-five years of the Journal of Corporate Finance: a scientometric analysis. J. Corp. Financ., 101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101572spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBaker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Fifty years of The Financial Review: a bibliometric overview. Financ. Rev., 55(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12228spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationR Core Team. (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://gephi.org/users/ publications/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr., 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThe Igraph Core Team. (2019). Igraph - Network analysis software. https://igraph.org/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSix, J. M., & Tollis, I. G. (2006). A framework and algorithms for circular drawings of graphs. J. Discret. Algorithms, 4(1), 25-50. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2005.01.009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exp., 21(11), 1129-1164. https:// doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKöseoglu, M. A., Sehitoglu, Y., & Craft, J. (2015). Academic foundations of hospitality management research with an emerging country focus: a citation and co-citation analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 45, 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.12.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKumar, S., Pandey, N., & Tomar, S. (2020). Twenty years of Latin American Business Review: a bibliometric overview. Lat. Am. Bus. Rev., 21(2), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2020.1722683spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPutman, R. (2001). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Princeton: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPrell, C. (2009). Linking social capital to small-worlds: a look at local and network-level processes and structure. Methodol. Innov. Online, 4(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/205979910900400102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUniversity of São Paulo. https://www5.usp.br/institucional/a-usp/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuacquarelli Symonds. (2020). qs World University Rankings 2019: top global universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/universityrankings/ world-university-rankings/2019spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuacquarelli Symonds. (2020). qs World University Rankings 2019: top global universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/universityrankings/ world-university-rankings/2019spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFaculdade de Economia Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo. http://www.fea.usp.br/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuacquarelli Symonds. (2020). qs World University Rankings for Business & Management Studies 2020. https://www.topuniversities. com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/businessmanagement- studiespa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationQuacquarelli Symonds. (2020). qs World University Rankings for Business & Management Studies 2020. https://www.topuniversities. com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/businessmanagement- studiespa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUniversidad de los Andes. Nuestra historia. https://uniandes.edu.co/ es/universidad/informacion-general/historiaspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUniversidad de los Andes. La Facultad - Facultad de Administración. https://administracion.uniandes.edu.co/index.php/es/facultad/sobre-lafacultad/ la-facultadspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBiblioteca del Congreso Nacional. (1842). Ley Universidad de Chile. Su creación. https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1081247&id Parte=spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile. Historia de la Facultad. http://www.fen.uchile.cl/es/quienes-somos/historiafacultadspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectInvestigación en administraciónspa
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaspa
dc.subjectBibliometríaspa
dc.subjectMapas de cienciaspa
dc.subjectRedes de coautoríaspa
dc.subject.ddcDe obras sobre temas específicos
dc.subject.ddcAdministración general
dc.subject.keywordManagement researchspa
dc.subject.keywordLatin Americaspa
dc.subject.keywordBibliometricsspa
dc.subject.keywordScience mappingspa
dc.subject.keywordCo-authorshipspa
dc.titleAtlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 4spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleAtlas of Management Research in Latin America Vol. 4eng
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
DI-158.pdf
Tamaño:
4.79 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Escuela de Administración