Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 2

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorCortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T22:37:58Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T22:37:58Z
dc.date.created2020-08-26
dc.descriptionEste documento presenta el segundo volumen del Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina. Se empleó la técnica de cocitaciones (CC) a una muestra de más de 17 000 artículos del campo de negocios, administración y contabilidad indexados en la base de datos bibliográfica Scopus publicados por autores de América Latina (ALC). Se modelaron y visualizaron las redes de CC para ALC y para cada uno de los países, además de computar la densidad e intermediación de las redes y de los nodos, respectivamente. Los estudios de mayor intermediación, y que no se identificaron en el primer volumen del Atlas, están relacionados con desarrollos teóricos/conceptuales para el robustecimiento de la metodología de estudio de caso y la teoría de la firma, la perspectiva basada en los recursos, acompañada de contribuciones asociadas con valor de marca, aprendizaje organizacional y teoría de los stakeholders. Lo anterior seguido de estudios sobre liderazgo, cultura organizacional, su relación con la estrategia, y la vinculación de la estrategia con las prácticas contables. Adicionalmente, investigaciones sobreteoría del comportamiento, comprendiendo factores como la autoeficacia y la gestión de la impresión, en el plano organizacional, y el individualismo y colectivismo, a nivel nacional. Al igual que el primer volumen, se proveen los datos en acceso abierto.spa
dc.description.abstractThis document presents the second volume of the Atlas of Management Research in Latin America. The technique of co-citations (CC) was implemented to a sample of more than 17 000 articles indexed in the bibliographic database Scopus in the field of business, management and accounting published by authors from Latin America (LAC). The cc networks for LAC and each of the countries were modeled and visualized. Further, the networks’ density and the nodes’ betweenness as calculated. The studies with the highest betweenness, and which were not identified in the first volume of the Atlas, were related to theoretical/conceptual developments for the strengthening of the case study methodology and the theory of the firm, the resource-based perspective, accompanied by contributions related to brand value, organizational learning, and stakeholder theory. That was followed by studies on leadership, organizational culture, its relationship to strategy, and the relationship of strategy to accounting practices. It also was identified research on behavioral theory, including factors such as self-efficacy and impression management, at the organizational level, and individualism and collectivism at the national level. Like the first volume, the data are provided in open access.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.tipoDocumentospa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_28292
dc.identifier.issn2463-1892
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28292
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 156
dc.relation.citationTitleDocumento de investigación
dc.relation.ispartofDocumento de investigación, ISSN: 2463-1892, No.156 (agosto, 2020); 45 pp.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmall, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCortés Sánchez, J. D. (2020). Atlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina. Vol. 1. Bogotá.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc., 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKlavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 68(4), 984-998. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.23734spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNakamura, M., Pendlebury, M., Schnell, D., & Szomszor, J. (2019). Navigating the structure of research on sustainable development goals. Philadelphia: Clarivate, Web of Science Group. https://clarivate.com/ webofsciencegroup/campaigns/sustainable-development-goals/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strateg. Manag. J., 29(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.659spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management 1980-2006: a citation/co-citation analysis. J. Oper. Manag., 27(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jom.2008.08.001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAcedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: an author co-citation analysis. Int. Bus. Rev., 14(5), 619-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.05.003spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationÜsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: a comparison of co-citation networks. Organ. Stud., 16(3), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSchildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: a co-citation analysis. Entrep. Theory Pract., 30(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6520.2006.00126.xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWang, N., Liang, H., Jia, Y., Ge, S., Xue, Y., & Wang, Z. (2016). Cloud computing research in the is discipline: a citation/co-citation analysis. Decis. Support Syst., 86, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dss.2016.03.006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVerma, S. (2018). Mapping the intellectual structure of the big data research in the is discipline: a citation/co-citation analysis. Inf. Resour. Manag. J., 31(1), 21-52. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2018010102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDi Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. J. Technol. Transf., 37(6), 789-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9239-2spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBackhaus, K., Lügger, K., & Koch, M. (2011). The structure and evolution of business-to-business marketing: a citation and co-citation analysis. Ind. Mark. Manag., 40(6), 940-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. indmarman.2011.06.024spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKöseoglu, M. A., Sehitoglu, Y., & Craft, J. (2015). Academic foundations of hospitality management research with an emerging country focus: a citation and co-citation analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 45, 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.12.004spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZhao, H., Zhang, F., & Kwon, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility research in international business journals: an author co-citation analysis. Int. Bus. Rev., 27(2), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ibusrev.2017.09.006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCulnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of mis, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis. mis Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., 11(3), 341-350. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 55249099424&partnerID=40&md5=cc3c916d4c2f5ae5b6b05ed645 e84f2aspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWalter, C., & Ribière, V. (2013). A citation and co-citation analysis of 10 years of km theory and practices. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., 11(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.25spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationXiao, H., Wang, Y., Li, W., & Ma, Z. (2017). Intellectual structure of research in business ethics: a citation and co-citation analysis on Business Ethics Quarterly. Nankai Bus. Rev. Int., 8(1), 100-120. https:// doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-10-2016-0035spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr., 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationThe igraph Core Team. (2019). igraph. Network analysis software. https://igraph.org/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationR Core Team. (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In International aaai Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://gephi.org/users/ publications/spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exp., 21(11), 1129-1164. https:// doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSix, J. M., & Tollis, I. G. (2006). A framework and algorithms for circular drawings of graphs. J. Discret. Algorithms, 4(1), 25-50. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2005.01.009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev., 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFornell, C. (1981). Increasing the organizational influence of corporate consumer affairs departments. J. Consum. Aff., 15(2), 191-213. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1981.tb00709.xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBarney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage., 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods no title. Thousand Oaks: sagespa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J., 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAnderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull., 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.103.3.411spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ., 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-Xspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organ. Dyn., 9(1), 42-63. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev., 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.84.2.191spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2011). Individualism-collectivism in Hofstede and globe. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 42(3), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1057/ jibs.2010.62spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLuo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 38(4), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychol. Bull., 107(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationContreras, A. M., Rosa, E., Pérez, M., Van Langenhove, H., & Dewulf, J. (2009). Comparative life cycle assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production. J. Clean. Prod., 17(8), 772-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.001spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKeller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customerbased brand equity. J. Mark., 57(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNorton, B. G., & Ulanowicz, R. E. (1992). Scale and biodiversity policy: a hierarchical approach. Ambio, 21(3), 244-249. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_31spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGraziano, J. E., & Flanagan, P. J. (2005). Explore the art of consultative selling. J. Account., 199(1), 34-37. https://search.proquest. com/openview/690fa5bc2ce6fb21019eeae5d5f2ac4d/1? pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41065spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBates, K. A., Amundson, S. D., Schroeder, R. G., & Morris, W. T. (1995). The crucial interrelationship between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture. Manage. Sci., 41(10), 1565-1580. https:// doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.10.1565spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLevitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 14(1), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. so.14.080188.001535spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGunder, A. (1975). On capitalist underdevelopment, 2014/08/01. Bombay: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlves, D. S. (2002). Space-time dynamics of deforestation in Brazilian Amazǒnia. Int. J. Remote Sens., 23(14), 2903-2908. https://doi. org/10.1080/01431160110096791spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCook, S. A. (1971). The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In Proceedings of the Annual acm Symposium on Theory of Computing pp. 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1145/800157.805047spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad. Manag. Rev., 24(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.1999.1893929spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSvensson, G. (2013). Processes of substantiations and contributions through theory building towards theory in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev., 25(5), 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2012-0071spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFoucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/ knowledge: selected interviews and other writings (pp. 109-133). New York: Random House.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63(7), 1313-1326. https:// doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectInvestigación en administraciónspa
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaspa
dc.subjectMapas de cienciaspa
dc.subjectCocitacionesspa
dc.subjectBibliometríaspa
dc.subject.ddcDe obras sobre temas específicosspa
dc.subject.ddcAdministración generalspa
dc.subject.keywordManagement researchspa
dc.subject.keywordLatin-Americaspa
dc.subject.keywordScience mappingspa
dc.subject.keywordCo-citationsspa
dc.subject.keywordBibliometricsspa
dc.titleAtlas de la investigación en administración en América Latina Vol. 2spa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleAtlas of Management Research in Latin America Vol. 2eng
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaDocumento de trabajospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
DI-156 w.pdf
Tamaño:
6.43 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Escuela de Administración