Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Relationship between perceived and actual occupancy rates in urban settings

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorKlein, Ryan W.spa
dc.creatorKoeser, Andrew K.spa
dc.creatorHauer, Richard J.spa
dc.creatorHansen, Gailspa
dc.creatorEscobedo, Francisco J.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T00:01:50Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T00:01:50Z
dc.date.created2016spa
dc.description.abstractArborists and tree care professionals assess tree risk by considering likelihood of impacting a target, likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure (should a target be impacted). For basic risk assessments, these three factors are typically assessed qualitatively using visual cues, though it is possible to quantify target occupancy (as it relates to the likelihood of impacting a target) using traffic monitoring equipment. For this study, 115 arborists were surveyed to see if their visual assessments of occupancy (based on videos filmed during different seasons and time of day) correlated with the actual measured occupancy counts recorded at four different locations. While there was a significant relationship between visual target occupancy ratings and actual occupancy, ratings were improved when traffic counter data was provided. Additionally, 70% of respondents considered traffic counters a worthwhile investment as they believed they could increase the accuracy of target occupancy assessments. © 2016 Elsevier GmbHeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.030
dc.identifier.issn16188667
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23415
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherElsevier GmbHspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage201
dc.relation.citationStartPage194
dc.relation.citationTitleUrban Forestry and Urban Greening
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 19
dc.relation.ispartofUrban Forestry and Urban Greening, ISSN:16188667, Vol.19,(2016); pp. 194-201spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979681371&doi=10.1016%2fj.ufug.2016.06.030&partnerID=40&md5=d7fce194b121dcee46f846e168163fd7spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordAccuracy assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental monitoringspa
dc.subject.keywordInvestmentspa
dc.subject.keywordRisk assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordRisk perceptionspa
dc.subject.keywordRoad trafficspa
dc.subject.keywordSpecies occurrencespa
dc.subject.keywordTreespa
dc.subject.keywordUrban ecosystemspa
dc.subject.keywordUrban planningspa
dc.subject.keywordVisual cuespa
dc.subject.keywordRisk assessmentspa
dc.subject.keywordRisk perceptionspa
dc.subject.keywordTarget occupancyspa
dc.subject.keywordTraffic monitoringspa
dc.subject.keywordUrban treespa
dc.titleRelationship between perceived and actual occupancy rates in urban settingsspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos