Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Are all types of wrongdoing created equal in the eyes of voters?

dc.creatorBotero, Sandraspa
dc.creatorCastro Cornejo R.spa
dc.creatorGamboa L.spa
dc.creatorPavão N.spa
dc.creatorNickerson D.W.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T23:56:09Z
dc.date.available2020-05-25T23:56:09Z
dc.date.created2019spa
dc.description.abstractDo voters evaluate some forms of political wrongdoing more harshly than others? Do they punish private enrichment and clientelism equally? We argue that voters’ responses to political wrongdoing are a function of the expected benefits voters associate with specific types of malpractice. We conducted a survey experiment varying two common types of political wrongdoing and measuring citizens’ evaluations of political candidates in Argentina. The results show that respondents punish politicians engaged in private enrichment more severely than politicians engaged in clientelism. We test two arguments that could provide a mechanism for this phenomenon. While the strength of one's partisan affiliation does not moderate the treatment effect, we find that respondents with low socio-economic status punish illicit enrichment more harshly than clientelism and that respondents with high socio-economic status punish both types of wrongdoing equally. © 2019, © 2019 Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1651322
dc.identifier.issn17457289
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22340
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherRoutledgespa
dc.relation.citationTitleJournal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, ISSN:17457289,(2019)spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070810002&doi=10.1080%2f17457289.2019.1651322&partnerID=40&md5=ce77deb1385f11f98bea696ea66a0732spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordwrongdoingspa
dc.subject.keywordcreatedspa
dc.subject.keywordequalspa
dc.subject.keywordeyesspa
dc.subject.keywordvotersspa
dc.titleAre all types of wrongdoing created equal in the eyes of voters?spa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones