Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Reflexiones sobre el populismo y la polarización en América Latina y sus consecuencias para la democracia

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorMcCoy, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T17:44:41Z
dc.date.available2022-09-30T17:44:41Z
dc.date.created2022-08
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.descriptionEn la última década, el populismo y la polarización han disparado las alarmas de las amenazas a la democracia en todo el mundo. Una literatura emergente considera que la hiperpolarización es un factor clave que contribuye a la erosión democrática y a la creciente autocratización (Carothers & O’Donahue, 2019; McCoy & Somer, 2018; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Haggard & Kaufman, 2021). En América Latina, el populismo de izquierda y de derecha ha sido un elemento básico del debate popular y académico durante, al menos, las dos últimas décadas, especialmente a partir de la elección de Hugo Chávez en 1998 y cuyo mandato empezó en 1999. Por el contrario, en Estados Unidos el debate académico se centró en la polarización política durante las últimas tres décadas, pero solo comenzó a incorporar el populismo con la elección de Donald Trump, en 2016. Incluso entonces, quienes estudian política comparada, a menudo latinoamericanistas, dominaron el análisis del populismo (Hawkins & Littvay, 2019; Weyland & Madrid, 2019; Inglehart & Norris, 2016; McCoy, 2016).es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.11307es
dc.identifier.issn0124-4035es
dc.identifier.issn2145-5112es
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/36623
dc.language.isospaes
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/11307es
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/11307/10996es
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBerman, S., & Kundnani, H. (2021). The cost of convergence. Journal of Democracy, 32(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0013es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBermeo, N. G. (2003). Ordinary people in extraordinary times: The citizenry and the breakdown of democracy. Princeton University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBornschier, S. (2010). The new cultural divide and the two-dimensional political space in Western Europe. West European Politics, 33(3), 419-444.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarothers, T., & O’Donahue, A. (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCoppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alt-man, D.,... Ziblatt, D. (2020). V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10. En Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDalton, R. J. (2018). Political realignment: Economics, culture, and electoral change. Oxford Scholarship.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDalton, R. J., & Berning, C. C. (2021). Ideological polarization and far-right parties in Europe. En H. U. Brinkmann & K.-H. Reuband (Eds.), Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland - Wahlverhalten in Zeiten politischer Polari-sierung. Springer Verlag.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGreen, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2020). Let them eat tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. Liveright.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHaggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021). Backsliding: Democratic regress in the con-temporary world. Cambridge University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHawkins, K., & Littvay, L. (2019). Contemporary us populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHawkins, K. A. et al. (Eds.). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. hks Faculty Research Working Paper Series rwp16-026.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social iden-tity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeBas, A. (2011). From protest to parties: Party-building and democratization in Africa. Oxford University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLevick, L., & Olavarria-Gambi, M. (2020). Hindsight bias in expert surveys: How democratic crises influence retrospective evaluations. Politics, 40(4), 494-509.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLevitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMagyar, B. (2016). Post-communist mafia state: The case of Hungary. Central European University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128-145, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCoy, J. (2016, 31 de marzo). What Hugo Chávez and Donald Trump have in common. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/idus368895877820160331es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCoy, J., & Somer, M. (Eds.). (2018). Special issue: Polarization and de-mocracy. A Janus-faced relationship with pernicious consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1).es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCoy, J., & Somer, S. (2019a). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMcCoy, J., & Somer, M. (Eds.). (2019b). Special issue on polarized polities: A global threat to democracy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,681(1).es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMettler, S., & Lieberman, R. C. (2020). Four threats: The recurring crises of American democracy. St. Martin’s Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationemstein, D., Tzelgov, E., & Wang, Y. (2015). Evaluating and improving item response theory models for cross-national expert surveys. V-Dem Working Paper, 1.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoberts, K. M. (2021, 7 de junio). Populism and polarization in compa-rative perspective: Constitutive, spatial and institutional dimensions. Government and Opposition, 1-23.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSahd, J., Zovatto, D., Rojas, D., & Fernández, M. P. (Eds.). (2022). Riesgo político América Latina 2022. Centro Estudios Internacionales (ceiuc).es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSani, G., & Sartori, G. (1983). Polarization, fragmentation and competition in Western democracies. En H. Daalder & P. Mair (Eds.), Western Eu-ropean party systems. Sage.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationomer, M., & McCoy, J. (2018). Déjà vu? Polarization and endangered de-mocracies in the 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 3-15.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSomer, M., & McCoy, J. (2019). Transformations through polariza-tions and global threats to democracy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818058es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSomer, M., McCoy, J., & Luke, R. E. (2021, 12 de enero). Pernicious po-larization, autocratization and opposition strategies. Democratization, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTajfel, H., &Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Brooks/Cole.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTarrow, S. (2022). Polarization and its discontents: What Europe’s past can tell us about America’s future, unpublished manuscript.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTeam Populism. (2018). Policy brief on Populism in Europe and the Americas: What, When, who and so what?https://populism.byu.edu/App_Data/Publications/SegoviaMemo%20_final.pdfes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUrbinati, N. (2019). Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWeyland, K., & Madrid, R. L. (2019). When democracy Trumps populism: Eu-ropean and Latin American lessons for the United States. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZechmeister, E., & Lupu, N. (2019). Pulse of democracy. lapop. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/ab2018/2018-19_AmericasBarometer_Regio-nal_Report_10.13.19.pdfes
dc.subjectPopulismo en América Latinaes
dc.subjectPolarización en América Latinaes
dc.subjectAmenazas para la democraciaes
dc.subjectHiperpolarizaciónes
dc.subject.ddcCiencia políticaes
dc.titleReflexiones sobre el populismo y la polarización en América Latina y sus consecuencias para la democraciaes
dc.typearticle
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Reflexionessobreelpopulismoylapolarizacion.pdf
Tamaño:
855.7 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Desafíos