Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Sovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choice

dc.creatorMenzel, Susannespa
dc.creatorGreen , Tom L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T14:40:39Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T14:40:39Z
dc.date.created2013-02-01spa
dc.description.abstractThere is resistance to policies that would reduce overall consumption levels to promote sustainability. In part, this resistance is aided by the economic concept of consumer sovereignty (CS) and its presumption that choice promotes wellbeing. We investigate the concept of consumer sovereignty in the context of deepening concerns about sustainability and scrutinise whether the two concepts are compatible. We draw on new findings in psychology on human decision-making traits; we take into account increasing awareness about human dependencies on 'functioning' ecosystems and uncertainties on how ecosystems, human activities and human wellbeing are interlinked. We conclude that commitment to the concept of consumer sovereignty is incompatible with sustainability due to human characteristics, the difficult-to-predict behaviour of ecological systems and ignorance about the impact of human action on natural systems. We propose that the choice-set of available goods and services on markets should be constrained when consumption patterns can be linked to degradation of services provided by nature when those services are seen as crucial for human wellbeing. We advocate constraining the available choice-set through established governmental institutions aided by deliberative processes that engage members of the general public. Finally, we acknowledge that such processes are imperfect; nevertheless, we foresee that they will be essential for fostering wise decision-making and moving towards sustainability.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13528328798273
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0963-2719
dc.identifier.issnEISSN: 1752-7015
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26977
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherWhite Horse Pressspa
dc.relation.citationEndPage79
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 5
dc.relation.citationStartPage59
dc.relation.citationTitleEnvironmental Values
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 22
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Values, ISSN: 0963-2719; EISSN: 1752-7015, Vol.22, No.5 (2013); pp. 59-79spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2013/00000022/00000001/art00007;jsessionid=2mrkd2fqdfees.x-ic-live-02spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.accesoRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)spa
dc.sourceEnvironmental Valuesspa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subject.keywordConsumer sovereigntyspa
dc.subject.keywordDecision-making traitsspa
dc.subject.keywordDeliberative decision-makingspa
dc.subject.keywordHuman impact on ecosystemsspa
dc.subject.keywordIgnorancespa
dc.subject.keywordUncertaintyspa
dc.titleSovereign Citizens and Constrained Consumers: Why Sustainability Requires Limits on Choicespa
dc.title.TranslatedTitleCiudadanos soberanos y consumidores restringidos: por qué la sostenibilidad requiere límites en la elecciónspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones