Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Un marco metodológico extendido de Diferencia en Diferencias

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorCortés Cortés, Darwin
dc.creatorRuiz Paredes, Carlos Fabian
dc.creator.degreeDoctor en Economía
dc.creator.degreeLevelDoctorado
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-14T18:50:06Z
dc.date.available2026-01-14T18:50:06Z
dc.date.created2025-12-10
dc.descriptionEsta tesis propone un nuevo marco metodológico para estimar efectos causales en contextos donde las intervenciones no se aplican una sola vez, sino que se repiten, se intensifican o alteran la trayectoria del resultado. Mientras que la metodología tradicional de Diferencia en Diferencias (DiD) ha demostrado ser efectiva bajo supuestos de adopción única y tratamiento binario, su aplicación se vuelve problemática cuando las políticas se implementan por fases, con distinta intensidad, o de manera secuencial. Este trabajo responde a esa limitación al desarrollar una familia de diseños que permiten identificar efectos causales incluso en estos escenarios complejos.
dc.description.abstractThis thesis proposes a new methodological framework to estimate causal effects in contexts where interventions are not applied only once, but are repeated, intensified, or alter the trajectory of the outcome. While the traditional Difference-in-Differences (DiD) methodology has proven effective under assumptions of single adoption and binary treatment, its application becomes problematic when policies are implemented in phases, with varying intensity, or sequentially. This work addresses that limitation by developing a family of designs that allow for the identification of causal effects even in these complex scenarios.
dc.format.extent187 pp
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_47209
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/47209
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Economíaspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado en Economíaspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The review of economic studies, 72 (1), 1-19.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngrist, J. D., & Fernández-Val, I. (2013). ExtrapoLATE-ing: External Vali- dity and Overidentification in the LATE Framework. En D. Acemoglu, M. Arellano & E. Dekel (Eds.), Advances in Economics and Econo- metrics: Tenth World Congress (pp. 401- 434). Cambridge University Press.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics. En O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (pp. 1277 - 1366, Vol. 3). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1573-4463(99)03004-7
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAngrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.- S. (2010). The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (2), 3 - 30. https: //doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAthey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2022). Design-based analysis in Difference-In- Differences settings with staggered adoption. Journal of Econometrics, 226 (1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.10.012
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBellego, C., Benatia, D., & Dortet-Bernadet, V. (2025). The Chained Difference- in-Differences. Journal of Econometrics, 248 (1), 105783. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105783
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBonhomme, S., & Sauder, U. (2011). Recovering distributions in difference- in-differences models: A comparison of selective and comprehensive schooling. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (2), 479-494.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBorusyak, K., & Jaravel, X. (2018). Revisiting Event Study Designs, with an Application to the Estimation of the Marginal Propensity to Consume [Working paper, April 16, 2018. Version retrieved from Harvard Uni- versity website], Harvard University y London School of Economics. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/borusyak/files/borusyak_jaravel_ event_studies.pdf
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBorusyak, K., Jaravel, X., & Spiess, J. (2024). Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation. Review of Economic Studies, 91 (6), 3253-3285. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae007
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallaway, B., Goodman-Bacon, A., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2024). Difference in Differences with a Continuous Treatment (NBER Working Paper N.o 32117). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/ 10.3386/w32117
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCallaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225 (2), 200 - 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCurrie, J., & Gruber, J. (1996). Health Insurance Eligibility, Utilization of Medical Care, and Child Health. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (2), 431-466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946684
dc.source.bibliographicCitationde Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfoeuille, X. (2018). Fuzzy Differences-in- Differences. The Review of Economic Studies, 85 (2), 999 - 1028. https: //doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx049
dc.source.bibliographicCitationde Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfoeuille, X. (2020). Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. American Economic Review, 110 (9), 2964-2996. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181169
dc.source.bibliographicCitationde Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfoeuille, X. (2023). Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences Estimators with Several Treatments. Journal of Econometrics, 236 (2), 105480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jeconom.2023.105480
dc.source.bibliographicCitationde Chaisemartin, C., D’Haultfoeuille, X., Pasquier, F., Sow, D., & Vazquez- Bare, G. (2025). Difference-in-Differences for Continuous Treatments and Instruments with Stayers [arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06898, version 5]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06898
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDube, A., Girardi, D., Jordà, Ò., & Taylor, A. M. (2023, abril). A Local Projections Approach to Difference-in-Differences (NBER Working Paper N.o 31184) (Revision Date May 2025). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31184
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFricke, H. (2017). Identification Based on Difference-in-Differences Approaches with Multiple Treatments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79 (5), 789-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12178
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFrölich, M. (2004). Programme Evaluation with Multiple Treatments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18 (2), 181 - 224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950- 0804.2004.00001.x
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Sinkinson, M. (2011). The Effect of Newspa- per Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics. American Economic Review, 101 (7), 2980-3018. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.2980
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGoodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treat- ment Timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225 (2), 254 - 277. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGraham, B. S., de Xavier Pinto, C. C., & Egel, D. (2012). Inverse probability tilting for moment condition models with missing data. The Review of Economic Studies, 79 (3), 1053-1079.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHeckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation. En J. J. Heckman & E. E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics (pp. 4779- 4874, Vol. 6B). Elsevier. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1573-4412(07)06070-9
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoynes, H. W., Miller, D., & Simon, D. (2015). Income, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Infant Health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7 (1), 172-211. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20120179
dc.source.bibliographicCitationImbens, G. W. (2015). Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples. The Journal of Human Resources, 50 (2), 373-419. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/24735990
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeblebicioğlu, A., & Weinberger, A. (2020). Credit and the labour share: Evidence from US states. The Economic Journal, 130 (630), 1782- 1816.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMeer, J., & West, J. (2016). Effects of the Minimum Wage on Employment Dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources, 51 (2), 500 - 522. http: //www.jstor.org/stable/24736030
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMeyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13 (2), 151- 161. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07350015.1995.10524589
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMogstad, M., Santos, A., & Torgovitsky, A. (2018). Using Instrumental Variables for Inference About Policy Relevant Treatment Parameters. Econometrica, 86 (5), 1589- 1619. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15463
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOreopoulos, P. (2006). Estimating Average and Local Average Treatment Effects of Education When Compulsory Schooling Laws Really Matter. American Economic Review, 96 (1), 152 - 175. https://doi.org/10.1257/ 000282806776157641
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPicchetti, P., & Campos de Xavier Pinto, C. (2022). Marginal Treatment Effects in Difference-in-Differences [Working paper]. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.4110160
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRambachan, A., & Roth, J. (2023). A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends. Review of Economic Studies, 90 (5), 2555 - 2591. https://doi. org/10.1093/restud/rdad018
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023). What’s Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235, 2218- 2244. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSant’Anna, P. H. C., & Zhao, J. (2020). Doubly Robust Difference in Diffe- rences Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 219 (1), 101 - 122. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.06.003
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSnow, J. (1849). On the Mode of Communication of Cholera [Public do- main edition. 31 pages. National Library of Medicine ID: 0050707]. J. Churchill. http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/0050707
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStrezhnev, A. (2018). Semiparametric weighting estimators for multi-period difference-in-differences designs [Paper presented at the Annual Mee- ting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA]. https: / / static1 . squarespace . com / static / 5931baca440243906ef65ca3 / t / 5b807c5d0ebbe8b9b8c75878/1535147102290/generalized_did.pdf
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225 (2), 175- 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom. 2020.09.006
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTsai, L. (2024). Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Events [Working paper]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.05184
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWolfers, J. (2006). Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results. American Economic Review, 96 (5), 1802-1820. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1802
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWooldridge, J. (2007). Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. Journal of Econometrics, 141 (2), 1281- 1301. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:141:y:2007:i:2:p: 1281-1301
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2.a ed.). MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262232586/ econometric-analysis-of-cross-section-and-panel-data/
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectDiferencia en Diferencias
dc.subjectTratamientos repetidos
dc.subjectEfectos dinámicos
dc.subjectRupturas de tendencia
dc.subjectIntensidad acumulativa
dc.subjectIdentificación causal
dc.subject.keywordDifference-in-Differences
dc.subject.keywordRepeated treatments
dc.subject.keywordDynamic effects
dc.subject.keywordTrend breaks
dc.subject.keywordCumulative intensity
dc.subject.keywordCausal identification
dc.titleUn marco metodológico extendido de Diferencia en Diferencias
dc.typedoctoralThesis
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTesis de doctorado
local.department.reportFacultad de Economía
local.regionesBogotá
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Un_marco_metodológico_extendido_Ruiz_Paredes_Carlos_Fabian.pdf
Tamaño:
6.94 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Doctorado en Economía