Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Comparación del strain longitudinal global tomado con diferentes vendor en pacientes con trasplante cardíaco

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorManrique Espinel, Frida Tatiana
dc.contributor.advisorPerez-Fernandez, Oscar-Mauricio
dc.creatorBarrera López, Ana Madeleine
dc.creatorMartínez Caballero, Azucena
dc.creator.degreeEspecialista en Cardiologíaspa
dc.creator.degreetypeFull timespa
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T19:35:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T19:35:13Z
dc.date.created2019-08-12
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionAntecedentes: El strain longitudinal global (SLG) es una herramienta útil para la evaluación del rechazo en pacientes con trasplante cardíaco (P-TC). Sin embargo, existen controversias con respecto a su precisión y concordancia entre diferentes equipos y el impacto de los rechazos en el SLG. Métodos: P-TC estables fueron llevados a un análisis de SLG simultáneo con los equipos Philips® y General Electric® (GE). La concordancia del SLG fue evaluada utilizando diferencia de medias, gráficos de Bland-Altman y probabilidad de cobertura preespecificada de 2%. Luego, se dividieron en cuatro grupos según historia de rechazo trasplante cardiaco (TCr). Las diferencias entre grupos se realizaron con la prueba T de Student. Un valor de p <0,05 fue considerado significativo. Resultados: En 78 estudios comparativos, la diferencia de medias proporcional fue la más cercana a 0, lo que indica que ningún equipo ha subestimado o sobrestimado el SLG. Sin embargo, el porcentaje de observaciones que cayó dentro de un rango de 2% fue solamente de 47% y los límites en el gráfico de Bland-Altman fueron amplios. Aunque la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) fue en promedio normal (55,6 ± 7,6%), el promedio de SLG es bajo independientemente del equipo. El análisis de SLG mostró un valor menor con significación estadística en pacientes con historia de TCr (Grupo D), sin diferencias entre grupos con 1 o más rechazos. Conclusión: Los proveedores deben trabajar para mejorar el acuerdo en el análisis de GLS debido a la información significativa que proporciona en P-TC y otras cardiopatías.spa
dc.description.abstractBackground: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a useful tool for evaluation of rejection in Heart Transplant patients (HT-P). However, controversies exist regarding its accuracy and agreement among different vendors. Methods. Stable HT-P underwent simultaneous GLS analysis with vendors (Philips® and General Electric® -GE-). We evaluated GLS agreement between Philips and GE using mean signed difference, Bland-Altman plots and a pre-specified coverage probability of 2 % points. Then, patients were divided into four groups according to rejection history. Differences between groups were performed with T student test. p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results. In 78 studies were performed. Limits of agreement between vendors were broad, ranging from -6.52% to 6.35%. The mean signed difference between GLS measured by Phillips and GE, was closest to 0, indicating no substantial GLS over or under-estimation by either vendor. However, the percentage of observations that fell within a 2% range was 44 % between vendors. Remarkably, although the mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was normal (55.6  7.6%), the average GLS is low as measured by either vendor. Analysis of GLS showed a significant higher GLS in patients without HTr history (Group A), with statistical significance as compared with B, and D. No differences on GLS between groups of patients with any grade of rejection history (Group B vs C). No differences on LVEF were found in any group comparison. Conclusion: Vendors must work in improving agreement in GLS analysis due to the meaningful information it provides in HT-P and other cardio-myopathies.spa
dc.description.embargo2021-08-15 01:01:01: Script de automatizacion de embargos. info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2021-08-14
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_20108
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20108
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosariospa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.programEspecialización en Cardiologíaspa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, et al. Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDandel M, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging--clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;132(1):11–24.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShiino K, Yamada A, Ischenko M, Khandheria BK, Hudaverdi M, Speranza V, et al. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(6):706–16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNegishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH. What is the Primary Source of Discordance in Strain Measurement Between Vendors: Imaging or Analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):714–20.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMor-Avi V., Lang R.M., Badano L.P. et al. (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24277–313.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTseng AS, Gorsi US, Barros-Gomes S, Miller FA, Pellikka PA, Clavell AL, et al. Use of speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived strain and systolic strain rate measurements to predict rejection in transplant hearts with preserved ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):1–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlaya P, Osio LF. Strain and strain rate for dummies. 2011;18(6):340–4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart. 2014spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollier P, Phelan D, Klein A. A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Vol. 69, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier USA; 2017. p. 1043–56.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: Validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popović ZB, Marwick TH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: A meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P, et al. Myocardial Strain Measurement With 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Definition of Normal Range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTakigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, Yuda S, Sakata K, Ohte N, et al. Normal Range of Left Ventricular 2-Dimensional Strain. Circ J. 2012spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKocabay G, Muraru D, Peluso D, Cucchini U, Mihaila S, Padayattil-Jose S, et al. Normal Left Ventricular Mechanics by Two-dimensional Speckle-tracking Echocardiography. Reference Values in Healthy Adults. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed. 2014).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZghal F, Bougteb H, Réant P, Lafitte S, Roudaut R. Assessing global and regional left ventricular myocardial function in elderly patients using the bidimensional strain method. Echocardiography. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaier TE, Morgan D, Grapsa J, Demir OM, Paschou SA, Sundar S, et al. Ventricular remodelling post-bariatric surgery: Is the type of surgery relevant? A prospective study with 3D speckle tracking. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHolland DJ, Marwick TH, Haluska BA, Leano R, Hordern MD, Hare JL, et al. Subclinical LV dysfunction and 10-year outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoogslag GE, Abou R, Joyce E, Boden H, Kamperidis V, Regeer M V., et al. Comparison of changes in global longitudinal peak systolic strain after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(12):1321–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKusunose K, Yamada H, Nishio S, Tomita N, Hotchi J, Bando M, et al. Index-beat assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation using myocardial strain and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):953–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFarsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastel AL, Szymanski C, Delelis F, Levy F, Menet A, Mailliet A, et al. Prospective comparison of speckle tracking longitudinal bidimensional strain between two vendors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(2):96–104.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPichler P, Binder T, Höfer P, Bergler-Klein J, Goliasch G, Lajic N, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant patients: Three-year follow-up of deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from transthoracic echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(2):181–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaleh HK, Villarraga HR, Kane GC, Pereira NL, Raichlin E, Yu Y, et al. Normal ventricular mechanical function and synchrony values by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the transplanted heart with normal ejection fraction. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2011;30(6):652–8.leftspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(7):490–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIngvarsson A, Werther Evaldsson A, Waktare J, Nilsson J, Smith GJ, Stagmo M, et al. Normal Reference Ranges for Transthoracic Echocardiography Following Heart Transplantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):349–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarciniak A, Eroglu E, Marciniak M, Sirbu C, Herbots L, Droogne W, et al. The potential clinical role of ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(3):213–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClemmensen TS, Løgstrup BB, Eiskjær H, Poulsen SH. Serial changes in longitudinal graft function and implications of acute cellular graft rejections during the first year after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(2):184–93.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLe C, Binda C, Guerbaai R, Levy F, Graux P, Tribouilloy C, et al. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade : Implications for intervendor consistency Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat c , Franc. 2016;22–30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoepe K. A Bayesian Approach to Investigating Age-at-Death of Subadults in a Forensic Context. Biochem Medica. 2014;25(May):141–51.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPatrianakos AP, Zacharaki AA, Kalogerakis A, Solidakis G, Parthenakis FI, Vardas PE. Two-dimensional global and segmental longitudinal strain: are the results from software in different high-end ultrasound systems comparable? Echo Res Pract. 2015;2(1):29–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recomendaciones para la Cuantificación de las Cavidades Cardíacas por Ecocardiografía en Adultos : Actualización de la Sociedad Americana de Ecocardiografía y de la Asociación Europea de Imagen Cardiovascular. Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation : Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report — 2017 ; Focus Theme : Allograft ischemic time. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1037–46.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmenar-bonet L, Crespo-leiro G, Alonso-pulpo L, Gonza F, Sobrino-ma M, Sousa-casasnovas I, et al. Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXIX Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2017). 2018;71(11):952–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, et al. Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDandel M, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging--clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;132(1):11–24.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShiino K, Yamada A, Ischenko M, Khandheria BK, Hudaverdi M, Speranza V, et al. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(6):706–16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNegishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH. What is the Primary Source of Discordance in Strain Measurement Between Vendors: Imaging or Analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):714–20.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMor-Avi V., Lang R.M., Badano L.P. et al. (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24277–313.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTseng AS, Gorsi US, Barros-Gomes S, Miller FA, Pellikka PA, Clavell AL, et al. Use of speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived strain and systolic strain rate measurements to predict rejection in transplant hearts with preserved ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):1–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlaya P, Osio LF. Strain and strain rate for dummies. 2011;18(6):340–4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart. 2014spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollier P, Phelan D, Klein A. A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Vol. 69, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier USA; 2017. p. 1043–56.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: Validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popović ZB, Marwick TH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: A meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P, et al. Myocardial Strain Measurement With 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Definition of Normal Range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTakigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, Yuda S, Sakata K, Ohte N, et al. Normal Range of Left Ventricular 2-Dimensional Strain. Circ J. 2012spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKocabay G, Muraru D, Peluso D, Cucchini U, Mihaila S, Padayattil-Jose S, et al. Normal Left Ventricular Mechanics by Two-dimensional Speckle-tracking Echocardiography. Reference Values in Healthy Adults. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed. 2014).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZghal F, Bougteb H, Réant P, Lafitte S, Roudaut R. Assessing global and regional left ventricular myocardial function in elderly patients using the bidimensional strain method. Echocardiography. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaier TE, Morgan D, Grapsa J, Demir OM, Paschou SA, Sundar S, et al. Ventricular remodelling post-bariatric surgery: Is the type of surgery relevant? A prospective study with 3D speckle tracking. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHolland DJ, Marwick TH, Haluska BA, Leano R, Hordern MD, Hare JL, et al. Subclinical LV dysfunction and 10-year outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoogslag GE, Abou R, Joyce E, Boden H, Kamperidis V, Regeer M V., et al. Comparison of changes in global longitudinal peak systolic strain after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(12):1321–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKusunose K, Yamada H, Nishio S, Tomita N, Hotchi J, Bando M, et al. Index-beat assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation using myocardial strain and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):953–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFarsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastel AL, Szymanski C, Delelis F, Levy F, Menet A, Mailliet A, et al. Prospective comparison of speckle tracking longitudinal bidimensional strain between two vendors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(2):96–104.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPichler P, Binder T, Höfer P, Bergler-Klein J, Goliasch G, Lajic N, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant patients: Three-year follow-up of deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from transthoracic echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(2):181–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaleh HK, Villarraga HR, Kane GC, Pereira NL, Raichlin E, Yu Y, et al. Normal ventricular mechanical function and synchrony values by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the transplanted heart with normal ejection fraction. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2011;30(6):652–8.leftspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(7):490–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIngvarsson A, Werther Evaldsson A, Waktare J, Nilsson J, Smith GJ, Stagmo M, et al. Normal Reference Ranges for Transthoracic Echocardiography Following Heart Transplantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):349–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarciniak A, Eroglu E, Marciniak M, Sirbu C, Herbots L, Droogne W, et al. The potential clinical role of ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(3):213–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClemmensen TS, Løgstrup BB, Eiskjær H, Poulsen SH. Serial changes in longitudinal graft function and implications of acute cellular graft rejections during the first year after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(2):184–93.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLe C, Binda C, Guerbaai R, Levy F, Graux P, Tribouilloy C, et al. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade : Implications for intervendor consistency Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat c , Franc. 2016;22–30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoepe K. A Bayesian Approach to Investigating Age-at-Death of Subadults in a Forensic Context. Biochem Medica. 2014;25(May):141–51.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPatrianakos AP, Zacharaki AA, Kalogerakis A, Solidakis G, Parthenakis FI, Vardas PE. Two-dimensional global and segmental longitudinal strain: are the results from software in different high-end ultrasound systems comparable? Echo Res Pract. 2015;2(1):29–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recomendaciones para la Cuantificación de las Cavidades Cardíacas por Ecocardiografía en Adultos : Actualización de la Sociedad Americana de Ecocardiografía y de la Asociación Europea de Imagen Cardiovascular. Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation : Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report — 2017 ; Focus Theme : Allograft ischemic time. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1037–46.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmenar-bonet L, Crespo-leiro G, Alonso-pulpo L, Gonza F, Sobrino-ma M, Sousa-casasnovas I, et al. Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXIX Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2017). 2018;71(11):952–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, et al. Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDandel M, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging--clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;132(1):11–24.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShiino K, Yamada A, Ischenko M, Khandheria BK, Hudaverdi M, Speranza V, et al. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(6):706–16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNegishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH. What is the Primary Source of Discordance in Strain Measurement Between Vendors: Imaging or Analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):714–20.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMor-Avi V., Lang R.M., Badano L.P. et al. (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24277–313.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTseng AS, Gorsi US, Barros-Gomes S, Miller FA, Pellikka PA, Clavell AL, et al. Use of speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived strain and systolic strain rate measurements to predict rejection in transplant hearts with preserved ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):1–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlaya P, Osio LF. Strain and strain rate for dummies. 2011;18(6):340–4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart. 2014spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollier P, Phelan D, Klein A. A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Vol. 69, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier USA; 2017. p. 1043–56.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: Validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popović ZB, Marwick TH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: A meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P, et al. Myocardial Strain Measurement With 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Definition of Normal Range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTakigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, Yuda S, Sakata K, Ohte N, et al. Normal Range of Left Ventricular 2-Dimensional Strain. Circ J. 2012spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKocabay G, Muraru D, Peluso D, Cucchini U, Mihaila S, Padayattil-Jose S, et al. Normal Left Ventricular Mechanics by Two-dimensional Speckle-tracking Echocardiography. Reference Values in Healthy Adults. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed. 2014).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZghal F, Bougteb H, Réant P, Lafitte S, Roudaut R. Assessing global and regional left ventricular myocardial function in elderly patients using the bidimensional strain method. Echocardiography. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaier TE, Morgan D, Grapsa J, Demir OM, Paschou SA, Sundar S, et al. Ventricular remodelling post-bariatric surgery: Is the type of surgery relevant? A prospective study with 3D speckle tracking. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHolland DJ, Marwick TH, Haluska BA, Leano R, Hordern MD, Hare JL, et al. Subclinical LV dysfunction and 10-year outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoogslag GE, Abou R, Joyce E, Boden H, Kamperidis V, Regeer M V., et al. Comparison of changes in global longitudinal peak systolic strain after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(12):1321–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKusunose K, Yamada H, Nishio S, Tomita N, Hotchi J, Bando M, et al. Index-beat assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation using myocardial strain and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):953–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFarsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastel AL, Szymanski C, Delelis F, Levy F, Menet A, Mailliet A, et al. Prospective comparison of speckle tracking longitudinal bidimensional strain between two vendors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(2):96–104.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPichler P, Binder T, Höfer P, Bergler-Klein J, Goliasch G, Lajic N, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant patients: Three-year follow-up of deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from transthoracic echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(2):181–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaleh HK, Villarraga HR, Kane GC, Pereira NL, Raichlin E, Yu Y, et al. Normal ventricular mechanical function and synchrony values by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the transplanted heart with normal ejection fraction. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2011;30(6):652–8.leftspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(7):490–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIngvarsson A, Werther Evaldsson A, Waktare J, Nilsson J, Smith GJ, Stagmo M, et al. Normal Reference Ranges for Transthoracic Echocardiography Following Heart Transplantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):349–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarciniak A, Eroglu E, Marciniak M, Sirbu C, Herbots L, Droogne W, et al. The potential clinical role of ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(3):213–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClemmensen TS, Løgstrup BB, Eiskjær H, Poulsen SH. Serial changes in longitudinal graft function and implications of acute cellular graft rejections during the first year after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(2):184–93.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLe C, Binda C, Guerbaai R, Levy F, Graux P, Tribouilloy C, et al. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade : Implications for intervendor consistency Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat c , Franc. 2016;22–30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoepe K. A Bayesian Approach to Investigating Age-at-Death of Subadults in a Forensic Context. Biochem Medica. 2014;25(May):141–51.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPatrianakos AP, Zacharaki AA, Kalogerakis A, Solidakis G, Parthenakis FI, Vardas PE. Two-dimensional global and segmental longitudinal strain: are the results from software in different high-end ultrasound systems comparable? Echo Res Pract. 2015;2(1):29–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recomendaciones para la Cuantificación de las Cavidades Cardíacas por Ecocardiografía en Adultos : Actualización de la Sociedad Americana de Ecocardiografía y de la Asociación Europea de Imagen Cardiovascular. Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation : Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report — 2017 ; Focus Theme : Allograft ischemic time. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1037–46.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmenar-bonet L, Crespo-leiro G, Alonso-pulpo L, Gonza F, Sobrino-ma M, Sousa-casasnovas I, et al. Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXIX Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2017). 2018;71(11):952–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationD’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, et al. Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDandel M, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging--clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;132(1):11–24.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationShiino K, Yamada A, Ischenko M, Khandheria BK, Hudaverdi M, Speranza V, et al. Intervendor consistency and reproducibility of left ventricular 2D global and regional strain with two different high-end ultrasound systems. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(6):706–16.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNegishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH. What is the Primary Source of Discordance in Strain Measurement Between Vendors: Imaging or Analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):714–20.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMor-Avi V., Lang R.M., Badano L.P. et al. (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24277–313.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTseng AS, Gorsi US, Barros-Gomes S, Miller FA, Pellikka PA, Clavell AL, et al. Use of speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived strain and systolic strain rate measurements to predict rejection in transplant hearts with preserved ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):1–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOlaya P, Osio LF. Strain and strain rate for dummies. 2011;18(6):340–4.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction. Heart. 2014spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCollier P, Phelan D, Klein A. A Test in Context: Myocardial Strain Measured by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Vol. 69, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier USA; 2017. p. 1043–56.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: Validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popović ZB, Marwick TH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: A meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P, et al. Myocardial Strain Measurement With 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography. Definition of Normal Range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTakigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, Yuda S, Sakata K, Ohte N, et al. Normal Range of Left Ventricular 2-Dimensional Strain. Circ J. 2012spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKocabay G, Muraru D, Peluso D, Cucchini U, Mihaila S, Padayattil-Jose S, et al. Normal Left Ventricular Mechanics by Two-dimensional Speckle-tracking Echocardiography. Reference Values in Healthy Adults. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed. 2014).spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZghal F, Bougteb H, Réant P, Lafitte S, Roudaut R. Assessing global and regional left ventricular myocardial function in elderly patients using the bidimensional strain method. Echocardiography. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKaier TE, Morgan D, Grapsa J, Demir OM, Paschou SA, Sundar S, et al. Ventricular remodelling post-bariatric surgery: Is the type of surgery relevant? A prospective study with 3D speckle tracking. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHolland DJ, Marwick TH, Haluska BA, Leano R, Hordern MD, Hare JL, et al. Subclinical LV dysfunction and 10-year outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoogslag GE, Abou R, Joyce E, Boden H, Kamperidis V, Regeer M V., et al. Comparison of changes in global longitudinal peak systolic strain after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(12):1321–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKusunose K, Yamada H, Nishio S, Tomita N, Hotchi J, Bando M, et al. Index-beat assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation using myocardial strain and strain rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):953–9.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFarsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCastel AL, Szymanski C, Delelis F, Levy F, Menet A, Mailliet A, et al. Prospective comparison of speckle tracking longitudinal bidimensional strain between two vendors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(2):96–104.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPichler P, Binder T, Höfer P, Bergler-Klein J, Goliasch G, Lajic N, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant patients: Three-year follow-up of deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from transthoracic echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(2):181–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSaleh HK, Villarraga HR, Kane GC, Pereira NL, Raichlin E, Yu Y, et al. Normal ventricular mechanical function and synchrony values by speckle-tracking echocardiography in the transplanted heart with normal ejection fraction. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2011;30(6):652–8.leftspa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSyeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: A study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(7):490–6.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationIngvarsson A, Werther Evaldsson A, Waktare J, Nilsson J, Smith GJ, Stagmo M, et al. Normal Reference Ranges for Transthoracic Echocardiography Following Heart Transplantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):349–60.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarciniak A, Eroglu E, Marciniak M, Sirbu C, Herbots L, Droogne W, et al. The potential clinical role of ultrasonic strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(3):213–21.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClemmensen TS, Løgstrup BB, Eiskjær H, Poulsen SH. Serial changes in longitudinal graft function and implications of acute cellular graft rejections during the first year after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(2):184–93.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLe C, Binda C, Guerbaai R, Levy F, Graux P, Tribouilloy C, et al. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade : Implications for intervendor consistency Pierre-Vladimir Ennezat c , Franc. 2016;22–30.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRoepe K. A Bayesian Approach to Investigating Age-at-Death of Subadults in a Forensic Context. Biochem Medica. 2014;25(May):141–51.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPatrianakos AP, Zacharaki AA, Kalogerakis A, Solidakis G, Parthenakis FI, Vardas PE. Two-dimensional global and segmental longitudinal strain: are the results from software in different high-end ultrasound systems comparable? Echo Res Pract. 2015;2(1):29–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recomendaciones para la Cuantificación de las Cavidades Cardíacas por Ecocardiografía en Adultos : Actualización de la Sociedad Americana de Ecocardiografía y de la Asociación Europea de Imagen Cardiovascular. Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation : Thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report — 2017 ; Focus Theme : Allograft ischemic time. J Hear Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1037–46.spa
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlmenar-bonet L, Crespo-leiro G, Alonso-pulpo L, Gonza F, Sobrino-ma M, Sousa-casasnovas I, et al. Registro Español de Trasplante Cardiaco. XXIX Informe Oficial de la Sección de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1984-2017). 2018;71(11):952–60.spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subjectTrasplante cardiacospa
dc.subjectEcocardiografíaspa
dc.subjectStrainspa
dc.subjectRechazo Trasplantespa
dc.subject.ddcVarias ramas de la medicina, Cirugíaspa
dc.subject.keywordHeart Transplantationspa
dc.subject.keywordEchocardiographyspa
dc.subject.keywordStrainspa
dc.subject.keywordTransplant Rejectionspa
dc.subject.lembTrasplantes de corazónspa
dc.subject.lembEnfermedades cardíacasspa
dc.subject.lembEcocardiografíaspa
dc.subject.lembCardiologíaspa
dc.titleComparación del strain longitudinal global tomado con diferentes vendor en pacientes con trasplante cardíacospa
dc.typemasterThesiseng
dc.type.documentTrabajo de gradospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de gradospa
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
BarreraLopez--AnaMadeleine-2019.pdf
Tamaño:
888.79 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento principal
Descargar
Colecciones
Especialización en Cardiología