Ítem
Solo Metadatos

Eyewitness Memory Distortion Following Co-Witness Discussion: A Replication of Garry, French, Kinzett, and Mori (2008) in Ten Countries

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.creatorIto, Hiroshispa
dc.creatorBarzykowski, Krystianspa
dc.creatorGrzesik, Magdalenaspa
dc.creatorGülgöz, Samispa
dc.creatorGürdere, Cerenspa
dc.creatorJanssen, Steve M.J.spa
dc.creatorKhor, Jessiespa
dc.creatorRowthorn, Harrietspa
dc.creatorWade, Kimberley A.spa
dc.creatorLuna, Karlosspa
dc.creatorAlbuquerque, Pedro B.spa
dc.creatorKumar, Devvartaspa
dc.creatorSingh, Arman Deepspa
dc.creatorCecconello, William Weberspa
dc.creatorCadavid Espinha, Sara
dc.creatorLaird, Nicole C.spa
dc.creatorBaldassari, Mario J.spa
dc.creatorLindsay, D. Stephenspa
dc.creatorMori, Kazuospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T23:55:50Z
dc.date.available2020-05-25T23:55:50Z
dc.date.created2019spa
dc.description.abstractWe examined the replicability of the co-witness suggestibility effect originally reported by Garry et al. (2008) by testing participants from 10 countries (Brazil, Canada, Colombia, India, Japan, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; total N = 486). Pairs of participants sat beside each other, viewing different versions of the same movie while believing that they viewed the same version. Later, participant pairs answered questions collaboratively, which guided them to discuss conflicting details. Finally, participants took a recognition test individually. Each of the 10 samples replicated the Garry et al. finding: Participants often reported on the final test a non-witnessed answer that their co-witness had stated during the collaboration phase. Such co-witness suggestibility errors were especially likely when the witness had not disputed the co-witness's report during the collaboration phase. The results demonstrate the replicability and generalizability of the co-witness suggestibility effect. © 2018 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognitioneng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.004
dc.identifier.issn22113681
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22236
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage77
dc.relation.citationIssueNo. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage68
dc.relation.citationTitleJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
dc.relation.citationVolumeVol. 8
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, ISSN:22113681, Vol.8, No.1 (2019); pp. 68-77spa
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056576672&doi=10.1016%2fj.jarmac.2018.09.004&partnerID=40&md5=ec9e8e8725b28d3bb6e4d09aa1baff96spa
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosariospa
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspa
dc.subject.keywordCo-witness suggestibility effectspa
dc.subject.keywordEyewitness memoryspa
dc.subject.keywordMemory conformityspa
dc.subject.keywordMulti-lab replication projectspa
dc.subject.keywordPost-event conversationspa
dc.titleEyewitness Memory Distortion Following Co-Witness Discussion: A Replication of Garry, French, Kinzett, and Mori (2008) in Ten Countriesspa
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.spaArtículospa
Archivos
Colecciones
Artículos