Ítem
Acceso Abierto

Doble materialidad y sostenibilidad corporativa: un estudio bibliométrico sobre la participación del sur global

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
dc.contributor.advisorGrueso Hinestroza, Merlin Patricia
dc.creatorValderrama Medrano, Mariana
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Dirección
dc.creator.degreeLevelMaestría
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-18T17:13:34Z
dc.date.available2026-03-18T17:13:34Z
dc.date.created2021-03-03
dc.descriptionEste estudio realiza un análisis bibliométrico de la literatura académica sobre doble materialidad, con el objetivo de mapear y analizar la producción científica sobre doble materialidad en sostenibilidad corporativa (Scopus, n = 941), cuantificando productividad, citación (incluido índice h), redes de coautoría, y clústeres temáticos, poniendo énfasis en la participación y de autores, instituciones y países del Sur Global. Los resultados ofrecen una evaluación crítica sobre la representación y relevancia de las perspectivas del Sur Global en la sostenibilidad corporativa, contribuyendo al enriquecimiento de la comprensión y la aplicación del concepto de doble materialidad en contextos diversos.
dc.description.abstractSustainability has evolved beyond its initial environmental focus, incorporating social and economic dimensions that seek equitable and lasting development. A key concept within corporate sustainability is “double materiality,” which recognizes both the impacts of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors on organizations and the effects of these factors on the environment and society. However, the lack of consensus and differences in its application between regions of the Global North and South have created challenges in the standardization and effectiveness of sustainability practices in organizations. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of the academic literature on double materiality, with the aim of mapping and analyzing scientific output on double materiality in corporate sustainability (Scopus, n = 941), quantifying productivity, citation (including h-index), co-authorship networks, and thematic clusters, with an emphasis on the participation of authors, institutions, and countries from the Global South. The results offer a critical assessment of the representation and relevance of Global South perspectives in corporate sustainability, contributing to a richer understanding and application of the concept of double materiality in diverse contexts.
dc.format.extent69 pp
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_47645
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/47645
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Dirección
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accesRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accesoAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.licenciaEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAbbas, Q. E., Ali, F. H., Munir, S., & Arshad, Z. (2023). Hotspots and Trends of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. IRASD Journal of Economics, 5(3), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2023.0503.0154
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAccountAbility. (2018). AA1000 AccountAbility Principles 2018. AccountAbility. https://www.accountability.org/standards-entries/aa1000-accountability-principles-2018-english
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2023). Global trends in international research collaboration, 1980-2021. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(2), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0015
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrennan, N, & Gray. S (2005). The Impact of Materiality: Accounting’s Best Kept Secret. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1, 1–31.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
dc.source.bibliographicCitationChewning, G., Pany, K., & Wheeler, S. (1989). Auditor Reporting Decisions Involving Accounting Principle Changes: Some Evidence on Materiality Thresholds. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491208
dc.source.bibliographicCitationConfraria, H., & Godinho, M. M. (2014). The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1241–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1463-8
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDonthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEccles, R., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17950
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEdwards, M. G. (2021). The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3079–3094. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2790
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEscobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEuropean Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2021). Draft European sustainability reporting standards. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202302772
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEuropean Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2022). Double materiality: A conceptual framework. https://www.efrag.org/News/Public-261/Double-materiality-conceptual-framework
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFinancial Accounting Standards Board. (2010). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8: Conceptual framework for financial reporting. https://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1176170049695&acceptedDisclaimer=true
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195–221.
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlobal Reporting Initiative. (2020). GRI standards. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGlobal Reporting Initiative. (2021). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards 2021. https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language-versions/
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHladika, M., Grbavac, J., & Poljašević, J. (2025). Sustainability Reporting: Challenges and Risks in the Assessment of Double Materiality in the Agricultural Sector. European Sustainability Reporting Standards in Action: Context, Implementation, Ramifications, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.15611/2025.77.1.04
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/issued/part-a/conceptual-framework-for-financial-reporting.pdf
dc.source.bibliographicCitationInternational Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 320: Materiality in planning and performing an audit (NIA 320). IFAC. https://www.icjce.es/images/pdfs/tecnica2/normativainternacional/isa320r.pdf
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKim, C.-K. (2020). Jeffrey D. Sachs (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development (Foreword by Ban Ki-moon). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Asian Communication Research, 17(3), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.20879/acr.2020.17.3.166
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKPMG. (2020). The time has come: The KPMG survey of sustainability reporting 2020. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKPMG. (2022). Sustainability reporting: Navigating materiality. https://kpmg.com/sa/en/insights/esg/navigating-materiality.html
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2018). Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781849775069
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLessambo, F. I. (2018). The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Auditing, Assurance Services, and Forensics, 35–39. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90521-1_3
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLozano, R. (2018). Sustainable business: Understanding and managing the paradox. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(5), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2010
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNobes, C. W. (2024). From No Materiality to Double Materiality: A long-run analysis and its implications for standard-setting and research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5001195
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOesch, D., & Reinhart, N. (2025). Mandating Transparency: The Effect of ESG Disclosure Mandates on Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Practices. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5279209
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOll, J., Spandel, T., Schiemann, F., & Akkermann, J. (2024). The concept of materiality in sustainability reporting: from essential contestation to research opportunities. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(2), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-03-2024-0296
dc.source.bibliographicCitationOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD
dc.source.bibliographicCitationScoones, I. (2016). The Politics of Sustainability and Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSingh, J. P. (2024). 15. The Global Political Economy of North–South Relations: A View from the South. Global Political Economy, 352–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192847553.003.0015
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStubbs, W., Higgins, C. Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting. J Bus Ethics 147, 489–508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2954-0
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTettamanzi, P., Venturini, G., & Murgolo, M. (2022). Sustainability and Financial Accounting: a Critical Review on the ESG Dynamics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(11), 16758–16761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18596-2
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTijssen, R., & Kraemer-Mbula, E. (2017). Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance. Science and Public Policy, 45(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx074
dc.source.bibliographicCitationVelasco-Herrejón, P., Bauwens, T., & Calisto Friant, M. (2022). Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies. World Development, 150, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105725
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZhou, Y. (2011). Materiality Approach in Sustainability Reporting: applications, Dilemmas, and Challenges. Proceedings of The 1st World Sustainability Forum, 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/wsf-00548
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
dc.source.instnameinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectSostenibilidad
dc.subjectDoble materialidad
dc.subjectSostenibilidad corporativa
dc.subjectSur Global
dc.subjectBibliometría
dc.subjectResponsabilidad social corporativa
dc.subjectESG
dc.subject.keywordSustainability
dc.subject.keywordDouble materiality
dc.subject.keywordCorporate sustainability
dc.subject.keywordGlobal South
dc.subject.keywordBibliometrics
dc.subject.keywordCorporate social responsibility
dc.subject.keywordESG
dc.titleDoble materialidad y sostenibilidad corporativa: un estudio bibliométrico sobre la participación del sur global
dc.title.TranslatedTitleDouble materiality and corporate sustainability: a bibliometric study on the participation of the global south
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.spaTrabajo de grado
local.department.reportEscuela de Administración
local.regionesBogotá
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Doble_materialidad_y_sostenibilidad_corporativa_ValderramaMedrano-Mariana-2026.pdf
Tamaño:
1.28 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Maestría en Dirección